Performance of a Long-Span Suspension Bridge Subjected to Sudden Single Suspender Loss
Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 28, Issue 11
Abstract
Suspenders of long-span suspension bridges are thin structural components that are easily accessible to the public and in proximity to fast moving traffic. Their vulnerability and exposure to hazards make them especially prone to the risk of malicious or accidental damage. Albeit, the effect of suspender loss on the behavior and performance of long-span suspension bridges has not yet been thoroughly investigated. In this paper, therefore, using computational simulation, member removal analysis is undertaken to shed light on how a typical long-span suspension bridge responds to sudden loss of a single suspender. Two factors, the location of the lost suspender and live load cases, are addressed in the study. Simulation results show that only structural members in the immediate vicinity of the lost suspender are significantly affected by sudden suspender loss, while the rest of the bridge is hardly affected. The study suggests that single suspender loss scenarios in long-span suspension bridges like the prototype bridge investigated in this work do not trigger appreciable nonlinearity in the system or even cause the main cables to overcome friction at the saddles. As such, single suspender loss scenarios in bridges like the prototype system can generally be assessed using common analysis and design software.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data, models, or codes that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Acknowledgments
This material is based upon work supported by the Federal Highway Administration under Contract Number DTFH61-14-D-00010/693JJ318F000170. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Federal Highway Administration. The US Government does not endorse products, manufacturers, or outside entities. Such names are included here for informational purposes only and are not intended to reflect a preference, approval, or endorsement of any product or entity.
References
AASHTO. 1961. Standard specifications for highway bridges. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2018. Guide specifications for analysis and identification of fracture critical members and system redundant members. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
Adanur, S., E. K. Okur, A. C. Altunişik, M. Günaydin, and B. R. Rahwan. 2023. “Investigation of the structural behaviors of Bosphorus suspension bridge with vertical hangers replaced by inclined hangers.” Alexandria Eng. J. 65: 75–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2022.10.041.
Cao, R., A. K. Agrawal, and S. El-Tawil. 2021a. “Overheight impact on bridges: A computational case study of the Skagit River bridge collapse.” Eng. Struct. 237: 112215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112215.
Cao, R., A. K. Agrawal, S. El-Tawil, and W. Wong. 2020a. “Numerical studies on concrete barriers subject to MASH truck impact.” J. Bridge Eng. 25 (7): 04020035. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001570.
Cao, R., A. K. Agrawal, S. El-Tawil, and W. Wong. 2020b. “Performance-based framework for evaluating truck collision risk for bridge piers.” J. Bridge Eng. 25 (10): 04020082. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001618.
Cao, R., A. K. Agrawal, S. El-Tawil, and W. Wong. 2021b. “Performance-based design framework for concrete barriers subjected to truck collision.” J. Bridge Eng. 26 (8): 04021047. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001751.
Cao, R., A. K. Agrawal, S. El-Tawil, X. Xu, and W. Wong. 2019a. “Heavy truck collision with bridge piers: Computational simulation study.” J. Bridge Eng. 24 (6): 04019052. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001398.
Cao, R., A. K. Agrawal, S. El-Tawil, X. Xu, and W. Wong. 2019b. “Performance-based design framework for bridge piers subjected to truck collision.” J. Bridge Eng. 24 (7): 04019064. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001423.
Cao, R., S. El-Tawil, and A. K. Agrawal. 2020c. “Miami pedestrian bridge collapse: Computational forensic analysis.” J. Bridge Eng. 25 (1): 04019134. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001532.
Cao, R., S. El-Tawil, A. K. Agrawal, and W. Wong. 2021c. “Performance and capacity assessment of concrete barriers subject to lateral loading.” J. Bridge Eng. 26 (12): 04021090. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001789.
Cao, R., S. El-Tawil, A. K. Agrawal, X. Xu, and W. Wong. 2019c. “Behavior and design of bridge piers subjected to heavy truck collision.” J. Bridge Eng. 24 (7): 04019057. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001414.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). 2006. Design of steel structures, part 1-11: Design of structures with tension components. Eurocode 3. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
Chen, X., A. K. Agrawal, S. El-Tawil, X. Xu, R. Cao, and W. Wong. 2019. “Inelastic behavior of a bridge bent subjected to truck impact: Experimental and computational study.” Eng. Struct. 199: 109543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109543.
Chen, X., H. Li, A. K. Agrawal, M. Ettouney, and H. Wang. 2022. “Alternate load paths redundancy analysis of steel truss bridges.” J. Bridge Eng. 27 (11): 04022106. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001943.
Chen, X., H. Li, A. K. Agrawal, M. Ettouney, and H. Wang. 2023. “Performance-based retrofits of long-span truss bridges based on the alternate load path redundancy analysis.” J. Bridge Eng. 28 (2): 04022141. https://doi.org/10.1061/JBENF2.BEENG-5354.
DOD (United States Department of Defense). 2009. Unified facilities criteria: Design of buildings to resist progressive collapse. Rep. No. UFC 4-023-03. Washington, DC: DOD.
Frangopol, D. M., and K. Imai. 2004. “Reliability of long span bridges based on design experience with the Honshu–Shikoku bridges.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 60 (3–5): 373–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0143-974X(03)00117-2.
GSA (General Services Administration). 2003. Progressive collapse analysis and design guidelines for new federal office buildings and major modernization projects. Washington, DC: GSA.
Imai, K., and D. M. Frangopol. 2001. “Reliability-based assessment of suspension bridges: Application to the Innoshima Bridge.” J. Bridge Eng. 6 (6): 398–411. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2001)6:6(398).
Imai, K., and D. M. Frangopol. 2002. “System reliability of suspension bridges.” Struct. Saf. 24 (2–4): 219–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4730(02)00027-9.
Khandelwal, K., and S. El-Tawil. 2011. “Pushdown resistance as a measure of robustness in progressive collapse analysis.” Eng. Struct. 33 (9): 2653–2661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.05.013.
Kotsovinos, P., R. Judge, G. Walker, and P. Woodburn. 2020. “Fire performance of structural cables: Current understanding, knowledge gaps, and proposed research agenda.” J. Struct. Eng. 146 (8): 03120002. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002703.
Kunnath, S. K., Y. Bao, and S. El-Tawil. 2018. “Advances in computational simulation of gravity-induced disproportionate collapse of RC frame buildings.” J. Struct. Eng. 144 (2): 03117003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001938.
Li, H., A. K. Agrawal, X. Chen, M. Ettouney, and H. Wang. 2022. “A framework for identification of the critical members for truss bridges through nonlinear dynamic analysis.” J. Bridge Eng. 27 (8): 04022060. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001902.
LSTC (Livermore Software Technology Corporation). 2020. “LS-DYNA® keywords user manual volume II—Material models.” Accessed September 9, 2020. https://www.dynasupport.com/manuals/ls-dyna-manuals/ls-dyna_manual_volume_i_r12.pdf.
PTI (Post-Tensioning Institute). 2012. Recommendations for stay-cable design, testing and installation. Phoenix: Cable-Stayed Bridges Committee.
Qiu, W., M. Jiang, and Z. Zhang. 2014a. “Responses of self-anchored suspension bridge to sudden breakage of hangers.” Struct. Eng. Mech. 50 (2): 241–255. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2014.50.2.241.
Qiu, W., M. Jiang, and C. Huang. 2014b. “Parametric study on responses of a self-anchored suspension bridge to sudden breakage of a hanger.” Sci. World J. 2014: 512120. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/512120.
Sadek, F., J. A. Main, H. S. Lew, and S. El-Tawil. 2013. “Performance of steel moment connections under a column removal scenario. II: Analysis.” J. Struct. Eng. 139 (1): 108–119. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000617.
Sun, Z., S. Ning, and Y. Shen. 2017. “Failure investigation and replacement implementation of short suspenders in a suspension bridge.” J. Bridge Eng. 22 (8): 05017007. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001089.
Wang, H., Q. Chen, A. K. Agrawal, S. El-Tawil, B. Bhattacharya, and W. Wong. 2022. “Dynamic response and progressive collapse of a long-span suspension bridge induced by suspender loss.” J. Struct. Eng. 148 (6): 05022001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0003367.
Wolff, M., and U. Starossek. 2009. “Cable loss and progressive collapse in cable-stayed bridges.” Bridge Struct. 5 (1): 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732480902775615.
Wu, G., and W. Qiu. 2020. “Effect of load cases and hanger-loss scenarios on dynamic responses of the self-anchored suspension bridge to abrupt rupture of hangers.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 34 (5): 04020081. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001482.
Wu, G., W. Qiu, and T. Wu. 2019. “Nonlinear dynamic analysis of the self-anchored suspension bridge subjected to sudden breakage of a hanger.” Eng. Fail. Anal. 97: 701–717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.01.028.
Xu, X., R. Cao, S. El-Tawil, A. K. Agrawal, and W. Wong. 2019. “Loading definition and design of bridge piers impacted by medium-weight trucks.” J. Bridge Eng. 24 (6): 04019042. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001397.
Zhang, Z., T. Guo, S. Wang, J. Liu, and L. Wang. 2021. “Experimental study on post-fire properties of steel wires of bridge suspender.” Structures 33: 1252–1262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.04.099.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 28 • Issue 11 • November 2023
Copyright
© 2023 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Oct 7, 2022
Accepted: Jul 24, 2023
Published online: Sep 7, 2023
Published in print: Nov 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Feb 7, 2024
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.