Technical Papers
May 16, 2023

Comparison of Markovian-Based Bridge Deterioration Model Approaches

Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 28, Issue 8

Abstract

Bridge management systems are a critical component in the toolbox of those who are responsible for maintaining a population of bridges. Deterioration models are generally incorporated in bridge management systems, but minimal consideration is paid to how those models work and how the assumptions inherent to the model might influence the prediction. This paper identifies, synthesizes, and assesses typical bridge deterioration model approaches from the stochastic family of models. Each model considered is applied to two data sets for bridges in Texas and compared. A novel modeling approach that considers all models together is described. The novel approach demonstrates the value of considering multiple models when attempting to predict a future condition or behavior. It was found that a simple multiple model approach inherently and transparently reduces the uncertainty of a single model approach.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Agrawal, A. K., A. Kawaguchi, and Z. Chen. 2010. “Deterioration rates of typical bridge elements in New York.” J. Bridge Eng. 15 (4): 419–429. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000123.
Asghari, V., and S.-C. Hsu. 2022. “Upscaling complex project-level infrastructure intervention planning to network assets.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 148 (1): 04021188. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002221.
Assaad, R., and I. El-Adaway. 2020. “Forecasting and modeling bridge deterioration using data mining analytics.” In Proc., Construction Research Congress 2020: Computer Applications, 125–134. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Baik, H.-S., H. S. Jeong, and D. M. Abraham. 2006. “Estimating transition probabilities in Markov chain-based deterioration models for management of wastewater systems.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 132 (1): 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2006)132:1(15).
Barone, G., and D. M. Frangopol. 2014. “Reliability, risk and lifetime distributions as performance indicators for life-cycle maintenance of deteriorating structures.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 123: 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2013.09.013.
Bu, G., J. Lee, H. Guan, Y. Loo, and M. Blumenstein. 2015. “Prediction of long-term bridge performance: Integrated deterioration approach with case studies.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 29 (3): 04014089. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000591.
Butt, A. A., M. Y. Shahin, K. J. Feighan, and S. H. Carpenter. 1987. “Pavement performance prediction model using the Markov process.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1 (1123): 12–19.
Camahan, J., W. Davis, M. Shahin, P. Keane, and M. Wu. 1987. “Optimal maintenance decisions for pavement management.” J. Transp. Eng. 113 (5): 554–572. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1987)113:5(554).
Cavalline, T. L., M. J. Whelan, B. Q. Tempest, R. Goyal, and J. D. Ramsey. 2015. Determination of bridge deterioration models and bridge user costs for the NCDOT bridge management system. Rep. No. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina Dept. of Transportation.
Chang, M., M. Maguire, and Y. Sun. 2017. “Framework for mitigating human bias in selection of explanatory variables for bridge deterioration modeling.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 23 (3): 04017002. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000352.
DeLisle, R. R., P. Sullo, and D. A. Grivas. 2003. “Network-level pavement performance prediction model incorporating censored data.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1853 (1): 72–79. https://doi.org/10.3141/1853-09.
Frangopol, D. M., M.-J. Kallen, and J. M. V. Noortwijk. 2004. “Probabilistic models for life-cycle performance of deteriorating structures: Review and future directions.” Prog. Struct. Eng. Mater. 6 (4): 197–212. https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1528-2716.
Golabi, K., R. B. Kulkarni, and G. B. Way. 1982. “A statewide pavement management system.” Interfaces 12 (6): 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1287/inte.12.6.5.
Goyal, R., M. J. Whelan, and T. L. Cavalline. 2020. “Multivariable proportional hazards-based probabilistic model for bridge deterioration forecasting.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 26 (2): 04020007. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000534.
Hatami, A., and G. Morcous. 2016. “Deterministic and probabilistic lifecycle cost assessment: Applications to Nebraska bridges.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 30 (2): 04015025. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000772.
Huang, Y.-H. 2010. “Artificial neural network model of bridge deterioration.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 24 (6): 597–602. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000124.
Jiang, Y., M. Saito, and K. C. Sinha. 1988. “Bridge performance prediction model using the Markov chain.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1 (1180): 25–32.
Kale, A., B. Ricks, and R. Gandhi. 2021. “New measure to understand and compare bridge conditions based on inspections time-series data.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 27 (4): 04021037. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000633.
Leckrone, T., P. D. Thompson, K. Malarich, C. Domingo, and G. Fleming, et al. 2021. Integration of AASHTO element inspections data into NYSDOT structures management system and processes. Rep. No. Albany, NY: New York State Dept. of Transportation.
Lee, J., H. Guan, Y.-C. Loo, and M. Blumenstein. 2014. “Development of a long-term bridge element performance model using Elman neural networks.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 20 (3): 04014013. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000197.
Lee, J., K. Sanmugarasa, M. Blumenstein, and Y.-C. Loo. 2008. “Improving the reliability of a bridge management system (BMS) using an ANN-based backward prediction model (BPM).” Autom. Constr. 17 (6): 758–772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2008.02.008.
Li, Z., and R. Burgue no. 2010. “Using soft computing to analyze inspection results for bridge evaluation and management.” J. Bridge Eng. 15 (4): 430–438. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000072.
Lu, M., J. Hydock, A. Radlińska, and S. I. Guler. 2022. “Reliability analysis of a bridge deck utilizing generalized gamma distribution.” J. Bridge Eng. 27 (4): 04022006. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001842.
Madanat, S., and W. H. W. Ibrahim. 1995. “Poisson regression models of infrastructure transition probabilities.” J. Transp. Eng. 121 (3): 267–272. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1995)121:3(267).
Madanat, S., R. Mishalani, and W. H. W. Ibrahim. 1995. “Estimation of infrastructure transition probabilities from condition rating data.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 1 (2): 120–125. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(1995)1:2(120).
Manafpour, A., I. Guler, A. Radlińska, F. Rajabipour, and G. Warn. 2018. “Stochastic analysis and time-based modeling of concrete bridge deck deterioration.” J. Bridge Eng. 23 (9): 04018066. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001285.
Micevski, T., G. Kuczera, and P. Coombes. 2002. “Markov model for storm water pipe deterioration.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 8 (2): 49–56. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2002)8:2(49).
Mishalani, R. G., and S. M. Madanat. 2002. “Computation of infrastructure transition probabilities using stochastic duration models.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 8 (4): 139–148. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2002)8:4(139).
Morcous, G., and Z. Lounis. 2007. “Probabilistic and mechanistic deterioration models for bridge management.” In Proc., Computing in Civil Engineering 2007, 364–373. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Nickless, K., and R. A. Atadero. 2018. “Mechanistic deterioration modeling for bridge design and management.” J. Bridge Eng. 23 (5): 04018018. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001223.
Pandey, P., and S. Barai. 1995. “Multilayer perceptron in damage detection of bridge structures.” Comput. Struct. 54 (4): 597–608. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(94)00377-F.
Ranjith, S., S. Setunge, R. Gravina, and S. Venkatesan. 2013. “Deterioration prediction of timber bridge elements using the Markov chain.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 27 (3): 319–325. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000311.
Sobanjo, J. O. 2011. “State transition probabilities in bridge deterioration based on Weibull sojourn times.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 7 (10): 747–764. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732470902917028.
Srikanth, I., and M. Arockiasamy. 2021. “Remaining service life prediction of aging concrete bridges based on multiple relevant explanatory variables.” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr. 26 (4): 04021036. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000604.
Thompson, P. D., and K. M. Ford. 2012. Vol. 1 of Estimating life expectancies of highway assets: Guidebook. Report 713, 1(Project 08-71). Washington, DC: National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP).
Tran, D., B. C. Perera, and A. Ng. 2009. “Comparison of structural deterioration models for stormwater drainage pipes.” Comput.-Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 24 (2): 145–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.2008.24.issue-2.
Tran, H. D. 2007. “Investigation of deterioration models for stormwater pipe systems.” Ph.D. thesis, School of Architectural, Civil and Mechanical Engineering, Victoria Univ.
Wellalage, N. K. W., T. Zhang, and R. Dwight. 2015. “Calibrating Markov chain–based deterioration models for predicting future conditions of railway bridge elements.” J. Bridge Eng. 20 (2): 04014060. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000640.
Xu, G., and F. Azhari. 2021. “Predicting the remaining useful life of corroding bridge girders using Bayesian updating.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 35 (5): 04021055. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001626.
Yanev, B., and X. Chen. 1993. “Life-cycle performance of New York city bridges.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1389: 17.
Yuan, Y., W. Han, T. Guo, X. Chen, and Q. Xie. 2020. “Establishment and updating of nonstationary resistance deterioration model of existing concrete bridge component.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 34 (6): 04020104. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001517.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Bridge Engineering
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 28Issue 8August 2023

History

Received: Jun 24, 2022
Accepted: Mar 2, 2023
Published online: May 16, 2023
Published in print: Aug 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Oct 16, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Jin Collins, M.ASCE [email protected]
Univ. of Texas at El Paso, 500 W. University Ave, El Paso, TX 79968. Email: [email protected]
Univ. of Texas at El Paso, 500 W. University Ave, El Paso, TX 79968 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0424-665X. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Predicting Concrete Bridge Deck Deterioration: A Hyperparameter Optimization Approach, Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 10.1061/JPCFEV.CFENG-4714, 38, 3, (2024).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share