Technical Papers
Jan 8, 2024

Sustainability Analysis of Hollow Concrete Blocks Manufactured Using Recycled Concrete Aggregate and Fly Ash as an Eco-Friendly Construction Component

Publication: Journal of Architectural Engineering
Volume 30, Issue 1

Abstract

The present study focuses on the innovative technique for making rectangular and circular hollow concrete blocks using fly ash (FA) and recycled concrete aggregates (RCA). The feasibility of employing RCA in conjunction with fly ash as a substitute for natural aggregates and cement in a proportion ranging from 30%–90% and 15%–45%, respectively, is tested in the laboratory. According to current standards, the tests comprise the slump test, compressive strength test, water absorption test, and structural efficiency evaluation. An empirical quantitative technique is used for the cost–benefit analysis of a 100-square-foot model built with recycled concrete hollow blocks. The study suggests that employing recycled concrete aggregate and fly ash as replacements for conventional materials would result in a minimum cost savings of 17%. The quantity of greenhouse gases produced in CO2 equivalents during concrete production is calculated using the Inventory of Carbon and Energy database. According to research findings, the utilization of recycled concrete aggregates and fly ash reduced carbon dioxide equivalent emissions by 30%–40%. It was also confirmed that cement has a major effect on greenhouse gas emission generation throughout the concrete manufacturing phase, regardless of the use of RCA over virgin aggregates. This study intends providing a significant understanding of how RCA and FA can not only contribute to environmental conservation but also offer economic benefits. Finally, the research intends to encourage the adoption of ecologically responsible and economically viable sustainable practices in the construction industry.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, and codes generated or used during the study appear in the published article. Some data, models, or codes that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The work was done using a seed grant fund offered by Presidency University, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India, to my supervisor Professor Jagdish Godihal and his colleagues Mr. Santhosh M B and Mr. Gopalkrishnan N, faculty members of the Civil Engineering Department. My sincere thanks to Dr. Ramesh C S, Dean R&D and Dr Nakul Ramanna, HOD Civil Department, Presidency University for their unconditional support throughout the study.

References

Akhtar, M. F., M. W. Naqvi, M. M. Alam, and M. Shariq. 2018. “Use of different types of aggregate vis-a-vis demolition waste as an alternative material for concrete.” In Urbanization challenges in emerging economies: Resilience and sustainability of infrastructure, edited by U. P. Singh and G. L. Sivakumar Babu, 679–690. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Al Fakhoury, J., E. Sassine, Y. Cherif, J. Dgheim, and E. Antczak. 2022. “Experimental feasibility for the incorporation of solid waste aggregates in masonry hollow blocks.” Eur. J. Environ. Civ. Eng. 26 (14): 7177–7191. https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2021.1982779.
Aslani, F., L. Hou, S. Nejadi, J. Sun, and S. Abbasi. 2019. “Experimental analysis of fiber-reinforced recycled aggregate self-compacting concrete using waste recycled concrete aggregates, polypropylene, and steel fibers.” Struct. Concr. 20 (5): 1670–1683. https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.201800336.
ASTM. 2016. Standard specification for load-bearing concrete masonry units. ASTM C90-14. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2017. Standard specification for non-loadbearing concrete masonry units. ASTM C129-17. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Blengini, G. A., and E. Garbarino. 2010. “Resources and waste management in Turin (Italy): The role of recycled aggregates in the sustainable supply mix.” J. Cleaner Prod. 18 (10–11): 1021–1030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.01.027.
BMPTC (Building Materials and Technology Promotion Council). 2018. “Ministry of Housing & Urban Affairs, Government of India.” Accessed September 22, 2022. www.bmtpc.org.
Choi, Y. W., Y. J. Kim, H. C. Shin, and H. Y. Moon. 2006. “An experimental research on the fluidity and mechanical properties of high-strength lightweight self-compacting concrete.” Cem. Concr. Res. 36 (9): 1595–1602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.11.003.
Collins, F. 2010. “Inclusion of carbonation during the life cycle of built and recycled concrete: Influence on their carbon footprint.” Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 15 (6): 549–556. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-010-0191-4.
Contreras, M., S. R. Teixeira, M. C. Lucas, L. C. N. Lima, D. S. L. Cardoso, G. A. C. da Silva, G. C. Gregório, A. E. de Souza, and A. dos Santos. 2016. “Recycling of construction and demolition waste for producing new construction material (Brazil case-study).” Constr. Build. Mater. 123: 594–600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.07.044.
CSE (Centre for Science and Environment). 2020. “India recycles only 1% of its construction and demolition waste.” DTE staff. Accessed September 22, 2022. https://www.downtoearth.org.in/news/waste/India-recycles-only-1-of-its-construction-and-demolition-waste-cse-73027.
de Brito, J., and N. Saikia. 2013. “Recycled aggregate in concrete.” In Green energy and technology, edited by J. de Brito, and N. Saikia, 1–22. London: Springer.
Di Maria, A., J. Eyckmans, and K. Van Acker. 2018. “Downcycling versus recycling of construction and demolition waste: Combining LCA and LCC to support sustainable policy making.” Waste Manage. (Oxford) 75: 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2018.01.028.
Flower, D. J. M., and J. G. Sanjayan. 2007. “Green house gas emissions due to concrete manufacture.” Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 12 (5): 282–288. https://doi.org/10.1065/lca2007.05.327.
Gao, Q., X.-G. Li, S.-Q. Jiang, X.-J. Lyu, X. Gao, X.-N. Zhu, and Y.-Q. Zhang. 2023. “Review on zero waste strategy for urban construction and demolition waste: Full component resource utilization approach for sustainable and low-carbon.” Constr. Build. Mater. 395: 132354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.132354.
Geng, W., C. Li, D. Zeng, J. Chen, H. Wang, Z. Liu, and L. Liu. 2023. “Effect of epoxy resin surface-modified techniques on recycled coarse aggregate and recycled aggregate concrete.” J. Build. Eng. 76: 107081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.107081.
Godihal, J. 2023. “An improved methodology for making recycled concrete aggregate (RCA)—Sustainable construction material.” In Proc., Advances in Construction Materials and Management, edited by A. Vilventhan, S. B. Singh, and V. S. K. Delhi, 359–370. Singapore: Springer. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering.
Gursel, A. P., H. Maryman, and C. Ostertag. 2016. “A life-cycle approach to environmental, mechanical, and durability properties of ‘green’ concrete mixes with rice husk ash.” J. Cleaner Prod. 112: 823–836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.029.
ICE (The Inventory of Carbon and Energy). 2011. Geoffrey Hammond and Craig Jones, edited by F. Lowrie and P. Tse. London, UK: University of Bath.
IS (Bureau of Indian Standards). 1970. (Reaffirmed 2002), Indian Standard specification for coarse and fine aggregates from natural sources for concrete. 2nd Revision. IS 383-70. New Delhi: India: IS.
IS (Bureau of Indian Standards). 2005. Part 1 Indian Standard concrete masonry units—Specification part 1 hollow and solid concrete blocks. 3rd Revision. IS 2185-05. New Delhi: India: IS.
IS (Bureau of Indian Standards). 2018. (Part 2) Indian Standard fresh concrete—Methods of sampling and analysis of concrete. IS 1199-18. New Delhi: India: IS.
IS (Bureau of Indian Standards). 2019. Concrete mix proportioning—Guidelines. 2nd Revision. IS 10262-19. New Delhi: India: IS.
Ittyeipe, A. V., A. V. Thomas, and K. P. Ramaswamy. 2020. “Comparison of the energy consumption in the production of natural and recycled concrete aggregate: A case study in Kerala, India.” IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 989 (1): 012011. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/989/1/012011.
Jiménez, C., M. Barra, A. Josa, and S. Valls. 2015. “LCA of recycled and conventional concretes designed using the Equivalent Mortar Volume and classic methods.” Constr. Build. Mater. 84: 245–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.03.051.
Jiménez, L. F., J. A. Domínguez, and R. E. Vega-Azamar. 2018. “Carbon footprint of recycled aggregate concrete.” Adv. Civ. Eng. 2018: 7949741. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7949741.
Josa, I., N. Tošić, S. Marinković, A. de la Fuente, and A. Aguado. 2021. “Sustainability-oriented multi-criteria analysis of different continuous flight auger piles.” Sustainability 13 (14): 7552. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13147552.
Kameswara Rao, B., M. Achyutha Kumar Reddy, and A. Venkateswara Rao. 2022. “Effect of flyash as cement replacement material and pore filling material in concrete.” Mater. Today:. Proc. 52: 1775–1780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.11.444.
Knoeri, C., E. Sanyé-Mengual, and H.-J. Althaus. 2013. “Comparative LCA of recycled and conventional concrete for structural applications.” Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 18 (5): 909–918. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-012-0544-2.
Murugesan, P., P. Partheeban, S. Manimuthu, V. Jegadeesan, and C. G. Christopher. 2023. “Multi-criteria decision analysis for optimum selection of different construction bricks.” J. Build. Eng. 71: 106440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.106440.
Nayaka, R. R., U. J. Alengaram, M. Z. Jumaat, S. B. Yusoff, and R. Ganasan. 2019. “Performance evaluation of masonry grout containing high volume of palm oil industry by-products.” J. Cleaner Prod. 220: 1202–1214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.134.
Ohemeng, E. A., and S. O. Ekolu. 2020. “Comparative analysis on costs and benefits of producing natural and recycled concrete aggregates: A South African case study.” Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 13: e00450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2020.e00450.
Pradhan, S., B. R. Tiwari, S. Kumar, and S. V. Barai. 2019. “Comparative LCA of recycled and natural aggregate concrete using Particle Packing Method and conventional method of design mix.” J. Cleaner Prod. 228: 679–691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.328.
Prathima, G., B. Ganesh, and K. P. Nagaraja. 2018. “Optimum utilization of alternate material for aggregates—An approach for waste management in urban areas for sustainability.” In Urbanization challenges in emerging economies: Energy and water infrastructure; transportation infrastructure; and planning and financing, edited by U. P. Singh and G. L. Sivakumar Babu, 221–231. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Rakesh, S., and M. Keshava. 2019. “A study on embodied energy of recycled aggregates obtained from processed demolition waste.” In Proc., National Conf. on Recent Trends in Architecture & Civil Engineering towards Energy Efficient and Sustainable Development. New Delhi, India: Krishi Sanskriti Publications.
Ram, V. G., K. C. Kishore, and S. N. Kalidindi. 2020. “Environmental benefits of construction and demolition debris recycling: Evidence from an Indian case study using life cycle assessment.” J. Cleaner Prod. 255: 120258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120258.
Sabău, M., D. V. Bompa, and L. F. O. Silva. 2021. “Comparative carbon emission assessments of recycled and natural aggregate concrete: Environmental influence of cement content.” Geosci. Front. 12 (6): 101235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2021.101235.
Sabău, M., and J. Remolina Duran. 2022. “Prediction of compressive strength of general-use concrete mixes with recycled concrete aggregate.” Int. J. Pavement Res. Technol. 15 (1): 73–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42947-021-00012-6.
Shekhar, D., and J. Godihal. 2023. “Recycled aggregate concrete hollow block as a sustainable walling material.” In Proc., Advances in Construction Materials and Management, edited by A. Vilventhan, S. B. Singh, and V. S. K. Delhi, 385–394. Singapore: Springer. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering.
TIFAC (Technology Information Forecasting and Assessment Council). n.d. Accessed September 12, 2022. https://tifac.org.in/index.php/8-publication/184-utilisation-of-waste-from-construction-industry.
Turk, J., Z. Cotič, A. Mladenovič, and A. Šajna. 2015. “Environmental evaluation of green concretes versus conventional concrete by means of LCA.” Waste Manage. (Oxford) 45: 194–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2015.06.035.
Vinod, B. R., H. J. Surendra, and R. Shobha. 2022. “Lightweight concrete blocks produced using expanded polystyrene and foaming agent.” Mater. Today:. Proc. 52: 1666–1670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.10.503.
Wijayasundara, M., P. Mendis, and R. H. Crawford. 2018. “Integrated assessment of the use of recycled concrete aggregate replacing natural aggregate in structural concrete.” J. Cleaner Prod. 174: 591–604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.301.
Xu, B., D. V. Bompa, and A. Y. Elghazouli. 2020. “Cyclic stress–strain rate-dependent response of rubberised concrete.” Constr. Build. Mater. 254: 119253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119253.
Yang, L., and S. Li. 2019. “Analysis of the effect of substitution rate on the mechanical properties of recycled concrete hollow block.” Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2019: 7546376.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Architectural Engineering
Journal of Architectural Engineering
Volume 30Issue 1March 2024

History

Received: May 16, 2023
Accepted: Oct 11, 2023
Published online: Jan 8, 2024
Published in print: Mar 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Jun 8, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Research Scholar, Presidency Univ., Bengaluru 560064, Karnataka, India (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5431-9717. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Presidency Univ., Bengaluru 560064, Karnataka, India. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9719-9850. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share