Technical Papers
May 22, 2024

Blockchain-Enabled City Information Modeling Framework for Urban Asset Management

Publication: Journal of Architectural Engineering
Volume 30, Issue 3

Abstract

Object-based modeling has become an integral and more preferred design approach as against two-dimensional (2D) design representation. This is evident in the increased use of building information modeling (BIM) for building design and city information modeling (CIM) for city planning and development. However, the development and management of object-based city models are often siloed and do not coexist in a virtual environment. Urban infrastructure is often designed in isolation, yet it forms part of an integrated network of assets in real life. Blockchain is one of several technologies that has been integrated with BIM because of its transparent and tamper-proof features. This research proposes a framework for the lifecycle management of buildings and other urban assets by integrating blockchain technology (BCT) into a heterogenous CIM of multiowned assets using a nested, multilevel data environment. First, the BIM is synchronized into a GIS scene for geospecificity, then the BIM metadata is written onto a blockchain protocol distributing the model information across a network of project collaborators using a common data environment (CDE). The resultant CIM is then shared through an outer layered city level CDE. Use case scenarios are presented to validate the functionality of the proposed approach, and research limitations are discussed. The framework enables the critical interproject or interasset communication which is otherwise impossible in traditional approaches where individual assets are designed as stand-alone models.

Practical Applications

Nowadays, nearly every physical product pre-exists in digital form for purposes of design, testing, and optimizing the product before its creation. This research argues that the city can also exist in digital form beyond a mere representation of its geometry, but encompassing the intangible information flow that exists between physical assets in real cities. This study proposes using City Information Modeling (CIM) that is enabled through blockchain technology (BCT) to record all activities concerning physical assets throughout their lifecycle. This is achieved by harnessing the various digital models that predate the physical components of the city from their design stages. These records of activities are retrievable and easily visualized interactively. Such CIM models are useful to trace the origins of building parts for accurate asset valuation or to review the maintenance services carried out on an asset and its impact on the constituent parts. It also provides a real template to commence new design projects whereby existing surrounding features, which are only possible through a site visit, can now be considered. The study takes into consideration the multiple ownership structure of city assets by integrating various digital models.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

Adekunle, S. A., C. Aigbavboa, O. A. Ejohwomu, W. Thwala, and E. R. Nosakhare. 2021. “Key constraints to optimal BIM penetration among Nigerian Quantity surveyors.” In Proc., CM50 Conf. Free State, South Africa: Central University of Technology.
Aggarwal, S., R. Chaudhary, G. S. Aujla, N. Kumar, K.-K. R. Choo, and A. Y. Zomaya. 2019. “Blockchain for smart communities: Applications, challenges and opportunities.” J. Network Comput. Appl. 144: 13–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2019.06.018.
Akintola, A., D. Root, and S. Venkatachalam. 2017. “Key constraints to optimal and widespread implementation of BIM in the South African construction industry.” Management 25: 34.
Al Furjani, A., Z. Younsi, A. Abdulalli, M. Elsaeh, A. Almahdi, K. Jouil, and S. B. Lashihar. 2020. “Enabling the city information modeling CIM for urban planning with OpenStreetMap OSM.” In Proc., 4th Int. Conf. for Geospatial Technologies–Libya GeoTec 4. Tripoli, Libya: The Libyan Society for Remote Sensing and Geographic Information Systems.
Aram, S., and C. Eastman. 2013. “Integration of PLM solutions and BIM systems for the AEC industry.” In Proc., Int. Symp. on Automation and Robotics in Construction. Montreal: IAARC Publications.
Ashton, K. 2009. “That “internet of things” thing.” RFID J. 22 (7): 97–114.
Barricelli, B. R., E. Casiraghi, and D. Fogli. 2019. “A survey on digital twin: Definitions, characteristics, applications, and design implications.” IEEE Access 7: 167653–167671. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2953499.
Biljecki, F., J. Stoter, H. Ledoux, S. Zlatanova, and A. Coltekin. 2015. “Applications of 3D city models: State of the art review.” ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 4: 2842–2889. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi4042842.
Boyer, M. C. 1996. Cybercities: Visual perception in the age of electronic communication. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
Darabseh, M., and J. Martins. 2020. “Risks and opportunities for reforming construction with blockchain: A biblio.” Civ. Eng. J. 6 (6): 1204–1217.
De Laat, R., and L. van Berlo. 2011. “Integration of BIM and GIS: The development of the CityGML GeoBIM extension.” In Advances in 3D geo-information sciences, edited by T. H. Kolbe, G. König, and C. Nagel, 211–225. Berlin: Springer.
Deng, Y., J. C. O. Cheng, and C. Anumba. 2016. “Mapping between BIM and 3D GIS in different levels of detail using schema mediation and instance comparison.” Autom. Constr. 67: 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2016.03.006.
Dorri, A., S. S. Kanhere, R. Jurdak, and P. Guaravaram. 2017. “Blockchain for IoT security and privacy: The case study of a smart home.” In Proc., IEEE Int. Conf. on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PerCom Workshops), 618–623. London, UK: IEEE.
Dounas, T., D. Lombardi, and W. Jabi. 2021. “Framework for decentralised architectural design BIM and Blockchain integration.” Int. J. Archit. Comput. 19 (2): 157–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478077120963376.
El-Mekawy, M., A. Ostman, and I. Hijazi. 2012. “A unified building model for 3D urban GIS.” ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 1 (2): 120–145. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi1020120.
Elshani, D., T. Wortmann, and S. Staab. 2022. “Towards better co-design with disciplinary ontologies: Review and evaluation of data interoperability in the AEC industry.” In Proc., 10th Linked Data in Architecture and Construction Workshop co-Located with 19th European Semantic Web Conf. Hersonissos, Greece: CEUR Workshop Proceedings.
Faniran, S., and K. Olaniyan. 2013. “From slums to smart cities: Addressing slum-dwelling in Nigeria through e-land administration.” In Proc., 7th Int. Conf. on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, 189–189. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
Floros, G., I. Pispidikis, and E. Dimopoulou. 2017. “Investigating integration capabilities between IFC and CityGML LOD3 for 3D city modelling.” Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci. 42: 1–6.
Gröger, G., and L. Plümer. 2012. “CityGML – interoperable semantic 3D city models.” ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 71: 12–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2012.04.004.
Hirt, S., and K. Stanilov. 2009. “Twenty years of transition.” In Human Settlements Global Dialogue Series 5.
Huang, S., G. Wang, Y. Yan, and X. Fang. 2020. “Blockchain-based data management for digital twin of product.” J. Manuf. Syst. 54: 361–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2020.01.009.
Isikdag, U., and S. Zlatanova. 2009. “Towards defining a framework for automatic generation of buildings in CityGML using building information models.” In 3D geo-information sciences, edited by J. Lee, and S. Zlatanova, 79–96. Berlin: Springer.
Jil, G., J. Almeida, and J. P. Duarte. 2011. “The backbone of a City Information Model (CIM): Implementing a spatial data model for urban design.” In Respecting fragile places: Education in computer aided architectural design in Europe, edited by Z.-S. Tadeja, J. Matevz, V. Spela, and J. Anja Jutraz, 143–151. Brussels, Ljubljana: ECAADe, Education and Research in Computer Aided Architectural Design in Europe.
Kang, T. W., and C. H. Hong. 2015. “A study on software architecture for effective BIM/GIS-based facility management data integration.” Autom. Constr. 54: 25–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2015.03.019.
Konashevych, O. 2021. “‘Goland registry” case study: Blockchain/DLT adoption in land administration in Afghanistan.” In Proc., 22nd Annual Int. Conf. on Digital Government Research, 489–494. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
Kuperberg, M., and M. Geipel. 2021. “Blockchain and BIM (building information modeling): progress in academia and industry.” Preprint, submitted March 11, 2021. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2104.00547.
Lee, D., S. H. Lee, N. Masoud, M. S. Krishnan, and V. C. Li. 2021. “Integrated digital twin and blockchain framework to support accountable information sharing in construction projects.” Autom. Constr. 127: 103688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103688.
Liu, X., X. Wang, G. Wright, J. Cheng, X. Li, and R. Liu. 2017. “A state-of-the-art review on the integration of Building Information Modeling (BIM) and Geographic Information System (GIS).” ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 6 (2): 53. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi6020053.
Lu, Q., L. Chen, S. Li, and M. Pitt. 2020a. “Semi-automatic geometric digital twinning for existing buildings based on images and CAD drawings.” Autom. Constr. 115: 103183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103183.
Lu, Q., X. Xie, A. K. Parlikad, and J. M. Schooling. 2020b. “Digital twin-enabled anomaly detection for built asset monitoring in operation and maintenance.” Autom. Constr. 118: 103277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103277.
Lv, Z., L. Qiao, Y. Li, Y. Yuan, and F.-Y. Wang. 2022. “Blocknet: Beyond reliable spatial digital twins to parallel metaverse.” Patterns 3 (5): 100468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2022.100468.
Mendi, A. F., and A. Cabuk. 2020. “Blockchain applications in geographical information systems.” Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 86 (1): 5–10. https://doi.org/10.14358/PERS.86.1.5.
NAD83(NSRS2007)/Florida North. 2007. North American datum of 1983, national spatial reference system 2007 national readjustment, national readjustment coordinates, Florida north. Washington, DC: National Geodetic Survey, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, US Dept. of Commerce.
Nagajayanthi, B. 2022. “Decades of internet of things towards twenty-first century: A research-based introspective.” Wireless Pers. Commun. 123 (4): 3661–3697. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-021-09308-z.
Nawari, N. O., and S. Ravindran. 2019. “Blockchain and the built environment: Potentials and limitations.” J. Build. Eng. 25: 100832. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2019.100832.
Nofer, M., P. Gomber, O. Hinz, and D. Schiereck. 2017. “Blockchain.” Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 59: 183–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-017-0467-3.
Pishdad-Bozorgi, P., J. H. Yoon, and N. Dass. 2020. “Blockchain-based information sharing: A new opportunity for construction supply chains.” EPiC Ser. Built Environ. 1: 274–282. https://doi.org/10.29007/8hng.
Qasse, I. A., M. Abu Talib, and Q. Nasir. 2019. “Inter blockchain communication: A survey.” In Proc., ArabWIC 6th Annual Int. Conf. Research Track, 1–6. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
Radanovic, I., and R. Likic. 2018. “Opportunities for use of blockchain technology in medicine.” Appl. Health Econ. Health Policy 16: 583–590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40258-018-0412-8.
Sabri, S., A. Rajabifard, S. Ho, M.-R. Namazi-Rad, and C. Pettit. 2015. “Alternative planning and land administration for future smart cities [leading edge].” IEEE Technol. Soc. Mag. 34 (4): 33–73. https://doi.org/10.1109/MTS.2015.2494298.
Sahal, R., S. H. Alsamhi, K. N. Brown, D. O'Shea, and B. Alouffi. 2022. “Blockchain-based digital twins collaboration for smart pandemic alerting: Decentralized COVID-19 pandemic alerting use case.” Comput. Intell. Neurosci. 2022: 7786441. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7786441.
Salheb, N., K. Arroyo Ohori, and J. Stoter. 2020. “Automatic conversion of CityGML to IFC.” In Proc., Int. Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 3rd BIM/GIS Integration Workshop and 15th 3D GeoInfo Conf. Gottingen, Germany: Copernicus Publications GmbH.
Salim, M. M., A. K. Comivi, T. Nurbek, H. Park, and J. H. Park. 2022. “A blockchain-enabled secure digital twin framework for early botnet detection in IIoT environment.” Sensors 22 (16): 6133. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22166133.
Sani, M. J., I. A. Musliman, and A. Abdul Rahman. 2022. “IFC to CityGML conversion algorithm based on geometry and semantic mapping.” Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci. 46: 287–293. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVI-4-W3-2021-287-2022.
Schmitt, G. 2012. “A planning environment for the design of future cities.” In Digital urban modeling and simulation, edited by S. M. Arisona, G. Aschwanden, J. Halatsch, and P. Wonka, 3–16. Berlin: Springer.
Shirowzhan, S., W. Tan, and S. M. E. Sepasgozar. 2020. “Digital twin and CyberGIS for improving connectivity and measuring the impact of infrastructure construction planning in smart cities.” ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 9 (4): 240. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi9040240.
Song, Y., X. Wang, Y. Tan, P. Wu, M. Sutrisna, J. Cheng, and K. Hampson. 2017. “Trends and opportunities of BIM-GIS integration in the architecture, engineering and construction industry: A review from a spatio-temporal statistical perspective.” ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 6 (12): 397. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi6120397.
Srećković, M., G. Šibenik, K. Sigalov, X. Ye, M. König, and K. Reitmayer. 2021. “Upkeeping digital assets during construction using blockchain technology.” In Vol. 2021 of Proc., Conf. CIB W78, 11–15.
Stojanovski, T. 2013. “City information modeling (CIM) and urbanism: Blocks, connections, territories, people and situations.” In Proc., of the Symp. on Simulation for Architecture & Urban Design, 1–8. San Diego, CA: Society for Computer Simulation International.
Succar, B., W. Sher, G. Aranda-Mena, and T. Williams. 2007. “A proposed framework to investigate building information modelling through knowledge elicitation and visual models.” In Proc., of the Australasian Universities Building Education Association. Queensland Australia: Australasian Universities Building Education Association (AUBEA).
Sundararajan, A. 2016. The sharing economy: The end of employment and the rise of crowd-based capitalism. Cambridge, London: The MIT Press.
Tam, V. W. Y., Y. Zhou, L. Shen, and K. N. Le. 2023. “Optimal BIM and LCA integration approach for embodied environmental impact assessment.” J. Cleaner Prod. 385: 135605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135605.
Underwood, S. 2016. “Blockchain beyond Bitcoin.” In Communications of the ACM, edited by Y. M. Moshe, 15–17. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
Wang, H., Y. Pan, and X. Luo. 2019. “Integration of BIM and GIS in sustainable built environment: A review and bibliometric analysis.” Autom. Constr. 103: 41–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.03.005.
Wang, W., and D.-S. Dai. 2010. “Research on the concessionaire selection for build-operate-transfer projects.” In Proc., Int. Conf. on Management and Service Science. London, UK: IEEE.
Xu, X., L. Ding, H. Luo, and L. Ma. 2014. “From building information modelling to city information modelling.” J. Inf. Technol. Constr. 19: 292–307.
Xue, F., L. Wu, and W. Lu. 2021. “Semantic enrichment of building and city information models: A ten-year review.” Adv. Eng. Inform. 47: 101245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2020.101245.
Yu, H., and Y. Liu. 2016. “Integrating geographic information system and building information model for real estate valuation.” In Proc., of the FIG Working Week. Christchurch, New Zealand: International Federation of Surveyors/ New Zealand Institute of Surveyors.
Zeadally, S., and J. B. Abdo. 2019. “Blockchain: Trends and future opportunities.” Internet Technol. Lett. 2 (6): e130. https://doi.org/10.1002/itl2.130.
Zhang, S., and T. Zhang. 2021. “Dynamic reputation incentive mechanism for BIM application in construction project.” J. Appl. Sci. Eng. Innovation 8 (1): 36–40.
Zheng, R., J. Jiang, X. Hao, W. Ren, F. Xiong, and Y. Ren. 2019. “bcBIM: A blockchain-based big data model for BIM modification audit and provenance in mobile cloud.” Math. Probl. Eng. 2019: 1–13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/5349538.
Zhu, J., X. Wang, P. Wang, Z. Wu, and M. J. Kim. 2019. “Integration of BIM and GIS: Geometry from IFC to shapefile using open-source technology.” Autom. Constr. 102: 105–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.02.014.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Architectural Engineering
Journal of Architectural Engineering
Volume 30Issue 3September 2024

History

Received: Mar 23, 2023
Accepted: Feb 22, 2024
Published online: May 22, 2024
Published in print: Sep 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Oct 22, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Univ. of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32601 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7325-9126. Email: [email protected]
Nawari O. Nawari, Ph.D., P.E., F.ASCE [email protected]
Univ. of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32601. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share