Technical Papers
Sep 7, 2023

Adopting Lean Management Principles for Renovation Projects

Publication: Journal of Architectural Engineering
Volume 29, Issue 4

Abstract

The concept of lean originated with the Toyota Production System, but the idea of applying lean to renovation is relatively unknown. Previous studies have predominately focused on waste elimination or on achieving efficiency by applying particular lean practices in renovation projects; however, there is a lack of a framework that would address the lean implementation, and this is a clear gap in the research. This study aims to examine the applicability of the 14 lean management principles (LMPs) to renovation projects. To achieve this aim, we adopted a quantitative approach using a survey, which focuses on linking LMPs to the operation and management of renovation processes. This study sampled 67 renovation professionals in Singapore’s renovation sector. The research findings revealed that the renovation contractors perceived manpower challenges as more significant than iron-triangle metrics. The findings also revealed isolated practice of LMPs by survey respondents, although with minimal knowledge and awareness of lean. The findings showed that the renovation companies have adopted those LMPs related to people and problem-solving lean management principles and regard them as important principles. In contrast, respondents perceived several process-oriented LMPs, such as pull and level-out workload, as less important. This isolated implementation suggests the relevance of LMPs to the renovation sector because some principles were already practiced, which would imply that the potential benefits of lean seen in other industries could be fully realized through the broader implementation of the 14 LMPs. The study contributes to the research in renovation by emphasizing the importance of lean thinking in the delivery of renovation projects, and it also contributes to the existing body of knowledge on lean in renovation by introducing the LMP as a holistic framework, rather than focusing on the lean toolbox.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or codes that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

Alsmadi, M., A. Almani, and R. Jerisat. 2012. “A comparative analysis of Lean practices and performance in the UK manufacturing and service sector firms.” Total Qual. Manage. Bus. Excell. 23 (3–4): 381–396. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2012.669993.
Ballard, G., and G. Howell. 2003. “Lean project management.” Build. Res. Inf. 31 (2): 119–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613210301997.
Bryde, D. J., and R. Schulmeister. 2012. “Applying Lean principles to a building refurbishment project: Experiences of key stakeholders.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 30 (9): 777–794. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2012.700405.
Cocolicchio, B. 2008. “Creating your lean future state: How to move from seeing to doing.” Qual. Prog. 41 (1): 88.
De Souza, L. B. 2009. “Trends and approaches in lean healthcare.” Leadersh. Health Serv. 22 (2), 121–139.
Ebbert, T., and U. Knaack. 2007. “The service integrated envelope applied for sustainable office refurbishment.” In Portugal SB07: Sustainable construction, materials and practices: Challenge of the industry for the new millenium, edited by L. Bragança, M. Pinheiro, S. Jalali, R. Mateus, R. Amoêda, and M. Correia Guedes, 147. Amsterdam, Netherlands: IOS.
Egbu, C. O. 1997. “Refurbishment management: Challenges and opportunities.” Build. Res. Inf. 25 (6): 338–347. https://doi.org/10.1080/096132197370156.
Egbu, C. O., B. A. Young, and V. B. Torrance. 1996. “Refurbishment management practices in the shipping and construction industries—Lessons to be learned: Comparative study of refurbishment management practices conducted to extend the boundaries of knowledge and encourage transfer of information between the sectors.” Build. Res. Inf. 24 (6): 329–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613219608727553.
Finke, M. R. 1998. “A better way to estimate and mitigate disruption.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 124 (6): 490–497. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1998)124:6(490).
Galiotto, N., P. Heiselberg, and M.-A. Knudstrup. 2016. “Integrated renovation process: Overcoming barriers to sustainable renovation.” J. Archit. Eng. 22 (1): 04015007. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000180.
Gao, S., and S. P. Low. 2012. “The adoption of Toyota way principles in large Chinese construction firms.” J. Technol.Manage. China 7 (3): 291–316.
Gao, S., and S. P. Low. 2014. “The Toyota way model: An alternative framework for lean construction.” Total Qual. Manage. Bus. Excell. 25 (5–6): 664–682. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2013.820022.
Gao, S., S. P. Low, and W. Tay. 2020. “Lean facilities management: Preliminary findings from Singapore’s international schools.” Facilities 38 (7/8): 539–558. https://doi.org/10.1108/F-07-2019-0076.
Günhan, S., D. Arditi, and J. Doyle. 2007. “Avoiding change orders in public school construction.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract. 133 (1): 67–73. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2007)133:1(67).
Hicks, B. J. 2007. “Lean information management: Understanding and eliminating waste.” Int. J. Inf. Manage. 27 (4): 233–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2006.12.001.
Joblot, L., T. Paviot, D. Deneux, and S. Lamouri. 2019. “Building information maturity model specific to the renovation sector.” Autom. Constr. 101: 140–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.01.019.
Johansen, P., S. Christensen, H. H. Neve, and S. Wandahl. 2021. “Lean renovation—A case study of productivity, flow, and time improvements.” In Proc., 29th Annual Conf. Int. Group for Lean Construction, 839–848: San Diego: International Group for Lean Construction.
Kazaz, A., E. Manisali, and S. Ulubeyli. 2008. “Effect of basic motivational factors on construction workforce productivity in Turkey.” J. Civil Eng. Manage. 14 (2): 95–106. https://doi.org/10.3846/1392-3730.2008.14.4.
Kemmer, S., and L. Koskela. 2020. “Lean as an appropriate approach for managing production in refurbishment projects.” In Lean construction: Core concepts and new frontiers, edited by P. Tzortzopoulos, M. Kagioglou, and L. Koskela, 230–252. London: Routledge.
Kemmer, S., L. Koskela, and V. Nykänen. 2013. Towards a lean model for production management of refurbishment projects. Espoo, Finland: VTT Technology.
Kempton, J. 2006. “Can lean thinking apply to the repair and refurbishment of properties in the registered social landlord sector?” Struct. Surv. 24 (3): 201–211.
Keskiniva, K., A. Saari, and J.-M. Junnonen. 2021. “TAKT production monitoring and control in apartment renovation projects.” Buildings 11 (3): 92. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11030092.
Lander, E., and J. K. Liker. 2007. “The Toyota Production System and art: Making highly customized and creative products the Toyota way.” Int. J. Prod. Res. 45 (16): 3681–3698. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540701223519.
Leung, H.-w., N.-M. Chu, C.-P. Wai, K.-W. Cheng, C.-L. Wong, and C.-W. Law. 2017. “Innovation for renovation-quieter methods to minimize structural-borne noise.” In INTER-NOISE and NOISE-CON Congress and Conf. Proc., 5291–5298. Reston, VA: Institute of Noise Control Engineering.
Liker, J. K. 2004. The Toyota Way: 14 management principles from the world’s greatest manufacturer. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Mohammadpour, A., C. J. Anumba, and J. I. Messner. 2017. “Retrofitting of healthcare facilities: Case study approach.” J. Archit. Eng. 23 (3): 05017003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000248.
Neve, H., and S. Wandahl. 2018. “Towards identifying making-do as lead waste in refurbishment projects.” In Proc., 26th Annual Conf. Int. Group for Lean Construction, 1354–1364. San Diego: International Group for Lean Construction. https://www.iglc.net.
Oppenheim, A. N. 2000. Questionnaire design, interviewing and attitude measurement. London: Bloomsbury.
Pikas, E., J. Kurnitski, R. Liias, and M. Thalfeldt. 2015. “Quantification of economic benefits of renovation of apartment buildings as a basis for cost optimal 2030 energy efficiency strategies.” Energy Build. 86: 151–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.10.004.
Pikas, E., O. Seppänen, L. Koskela, and A. Peltokorpi. 2021. “Challenges in industrialized renovation of apartment buildings.” In Proc., 29th Annual Conf. Int. Group for Lean Construction, 14–17. San Diego: International Group for Lean Construction.
Roeder, T. 2013. Managing project stakeholders: Building a foundation to achieve project goals. Hoboken: Wiley.
Sacks, R., L. Koskela, B. A. Dave, and R. Owen. 2010. “Interaction of lean and building information modeling in construction.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 136 (9): 968–980. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000203.
Sahlberg, J., J. Lehtovaara, and O. Seppänen. 2021. “Implementing Takt production in renovation projects.” In Proc., 29th Annual Conf. Int. Group for Lean Construction, 677–686. San Diego: International Group for Lean Construction. https://www.iglc.net.
Salah, D., and L. Khodeir. 2017. Examining the role of lean management in leading architecture renovation projects. In ArchCairo7 Building Innovatively Interactive Cities. Egypt: Site International.
Sierra, F. 2022. “COVID-19: Main challenges during construction stage.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 29 (4): 1817–1834. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-09-2020-0719.
Vrijhoef, R., and M. van Dijkhuizen. 2020. “Lean toolbox approach for effective preparation of housing refurbishment projects using critical success factors.” In Proc., 28th Annual Conf. Int. Group for Lean Construction, 181–192. San Diego: International Group for Lean Construction.
Wade, F., M. Shipworth, and R. Hitchings. 2016. “Influencing the central heating technologies installed in homes: The role of social capital in supply chain networks.” Energy Policy 95: 52–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.04.033.
Weeks, D. J., and F. Leite. 2022. “Ranking critical factors for facility renovation and system upgrade decisions in dormitories: A Delphi study.” J. Archit. Eng. 28 (4): 04022026. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000561.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Architectural Engineering
Journal of Architectural Engineering
Volume 29Issue 4December 2023

History

Received: Nov 30, 2022
Accepted: Jul 28, 2023
Published online: Sep 7, 2023
Published in print: Dec 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Feb 7, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Senior Lecturer, Faculty of Architecture, Building, and Planning, Univ. of Melbourne, Melbourne 3010, Australia (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4161-5592. Email: [email protected]
Sui Pheng Low [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of the Built Environment, College of Design and Engineering, National Univ. of Singapore, Singapore 117566. Email: [email protected]
Chong Wee Ling [email protected]
Student Researcher, Dept. of the Built Environment, College of Design and Engineering, National Univ. of Singapore, Singapore 117566. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share