Effects of Fixed Edge Conditions on the Load Resistance of Single Glass Lites
Publication: Journal of Architectural Engineering
Volume 29, Issue 1
Abstract
The load resistance (LR) of glass lites is determined in the United States by use of standards based on a probabilistic model of glass breakage. These standards generally restrict design to rectangular glass lites continuously supported along one, two, three, or four sides. In addition, these standards treat single glass lites as simply supported flat rectangular plates. Historically, rigid window frames supported single glass lites holding them in place with neoprene or similar gasket material. This attachment method approximated simply supported edges that rotate about an axis parallel to the simply supported edges, deform in the plane of the glass lite, and do not deflect out-of-plane. Advances in structural silicone make it possible to produce rectangular single flat glass lites with edge fixity somewhere between that of simply supported edges and fully fixed edges. The authors applied the glass failure prediction model (GFPM) to a nonlinear finite-element model developed previously by the authors to determine the probability of breakage for selected single glass lite geometries with fully fixed edges under uniform lateral loads. The paper presents comparisons between results of analyses of lites with fixed edges with analyses of lites with simply supported edges. The comparisons indicate that not all single glass lite geometries benefit from fully fixing edges, but the benefits of doing so appear to increase as lite aspect ratio (AR) increases. The comparisons bracket benefits that can accrue from the partial fixity provided by structural silicone supports. The actual degree of fixity provided by structural silicone can only be determined experimentally, which lies outside the scope of this paper.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
ASTM. 2016. Standard practice for determining load resistance of glass in buildings. ASTM E1300-16. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Beason, W. L., and J. R. Morgan. 1984. “Glass failure prediction model.” J. Struct. Eng. 110 (2): 197–212. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1984)110:2(197).
Morse, S. M. 2018. “New provisions in ASTM E1300-16: A comparison of the basic and new analytical procedures for determining the load resistance of window glass.” In Proc., Façade Tectonics 2018 World Congress, Vol. 2, edited by D. Noble, K. Kensek, and M. Elder, 529–541. Los Angeles: Tectonic Press.
Morse, S. M., and H. S. Norville. 2011. “An analytical method for determining window glass strength.” In Proc., Glass Performance Days 2011. London: Cvent.
Soules, J. G., S. M. Morse, and H. S. Norville. 2020. “Application of the glass failure prediction model to flat Odd-shaped glass using finite-element modeling.” J. Archit. Eng. 26 (4): 04020037. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000437.
Soules, J. G., S. M. Morse, and H. S. Norville. 2021. “Application of glass failure prediction model to bent glass using finite-element modeling.” J. Archit. Eng. 27 (2): 04021001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000454.
Vallabhan, C. V. G. 1983. “Iterative analysis of nonlinear glass plates.” J. Struct. Eng. 109 (2): 489–502. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1983)109:2(489).
Young, W. C., R. G. Budynas, and A. M. Sadegh. 2012. Roark’s formulas for stress and strain. 8th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2023 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Sep 3, 2021
Accepted: Nov 14, 2022
Published online: Jan 9, 2023
Published in print: Mar 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Jun 9, 2023
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.