Technical Papers
Jun 27, 2024

One-Dimensional Compression Behavior of River Silty Sand: Emphasizing the Equivalent Void Ratio Concept

Publication: International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 24, Issue 9

Abstract

Previously, studies have recognized that the characterization of the compression behavior of sand–silt mixtures that use different void ratio concepts is controversial and incomplete, because most of the earlier studies considered the global or intergranular void ratio as reliable parameters to explain the differences between the mechanical responses of sand–silt mixtures. However, the equivalent void ratio concept could be used as a well-founded alternative to express the compression behavior in mixed soils. To achieve this goal, compression behavior tests on Chlef silty sand were carried out. The specimens were subjected to one-dimensional (1D) oedometer loading conditions that emphasized the application of the global, intergranular and equivalent void ratios concepts. The Chlef sand specimens that were mixed with 0% to 40% silt contents were prepared using two fabric techniques [dry funnel pluviation (DFP) and moist tamping (MT)] at three initial relative densities (Dr = 18%, 52%, and 88%). A detailed analysis was carried out to compare the normal compression characteristics with those that were derived from the intrinsic compression (the normalized compression curves). Based on experimental evidence, this paper introduces a new dependable parameter, the equivalent compression index (Cc), which could be obtained from the [ e(logσv)] curve. The test results reveal that the equivalent void ratio concept plays a reliable role in the prediction of the compression behavior of the Chlef sand–silt mixtures, where the compressibility parameters of the tested specimens are well normalized using the equivalent compressibility curves for different fines contents that consider both fabric techniques and all selected initial relative densities. Based on the test results, the intrinsic compression characteristics (Ccint,Ccgint,andCcint) exhibit very similar tendencies compared to those of the normal compression (Cc,Ccg,andCc) and a correlation has been suggested between the two different compression characteristics. In addition, a new relationship has been developed that expresses the undrained mechanical characteristics (taken from a previous study) as a function of the obtained compression indexes that consider the effects of all selected parameters under the same experimental conditions.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, and codes generated or used during the study appear in the published article.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful for the financial support that was received from the Directorate General for Scientific Research and Technological Development, Algeria.

References

Altuhafi, F., B. A. Baudet, and P. Sammonds. 2010. “The mechanics of subglacial sediment: An example of new ‘transitional’ behaviour.” Can. Geotech. J. 47 (7): 775–790. https://doi.org/10.1139/T09-136.
ASTM. 2002a. Standard test method for maximum index density and unit weight of soils using a vibratory table. ASTM D4253-02. Annual Book of ASTM Standards. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2002b. Standard test method for minimum index density and unit weight of soils and calculation of relative density. ASTM D4254-02. Annual Book of ASTM Standards. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2011. Standard practice for one-dimensional consolidation properties of soils using incremental loading. ASTM D2435-11. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Bouri, D. E., A. Brahimi, A. Krim, A. Arab, J. Najser, and D. Mašín. 2022. “Compression behaviour of chlef sand and transition of fines content using pressure-dependent maximum void ratios of sand.” Geotech. Geol. Eng. 40: 1675–1692. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-021-01985-8.
Burland, J. B. 1990. “On the compressibility and shear strength of natural clays.” Géotechnique 40 (3): 329–378. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1990.40.3.329.
Cabalar, A. F. 2010. “Applications of the oedometer, triaxial and resonant column tests to the study of micaceous sands.” Eng. Geol. 112: 21–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2010.01.004.
Cabalar, A. F., and R. A. Hasan. 2013. “Compressional behaviour of various size/shape sand–clay mixtures with different pore fluids.” Eng. Geol. 164 (17): 36–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2013.06.011.
Carrera, A., M. Coop, and R. Lancellotta. 2011. “Influence of grading on the mechanical behaviour of Stava tailings.” Géotechnique 61 (11): 935–946. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.9.P.009.
Cherif Taiba, A., Y. Mahmoudi, M. Belkhatir, A. Kadri, and T. Schanz. 2016. “Insight into the effect of granulometric characteristics on static liquefation sucseptibility of silty sand soils.” Geotech. Geol. Eng. 34: 367–382. https://doi.org/DOI 10.1007/s10706-015-9951-z.
Cherif Taiba, A., Y. Mahmoudi, L. Hazout, M. Belkhatir, and W. Baille. 2019. “Effects of gradation on the mobilized friction angle for the instability and steady states of sand-silt mixtures: Experimental evidence.” Acta Geotech. Slov. 16 (1): 79–95. https://doi.org/10.18690/actageotechslov.16.1.79-95.
Deng, Y., Y. Yilmaz, A. Gokce, and C. S. Chang. 2021. “Influence of particle size on the drained shear behavior of a dense fluvial sand.” Acta Geotech. 16: 2071–2088. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-021-01143-7.
Fan, J., R. K. Rowe, and R. W. I. Brachman. 2022. “Compressibility and permeability of sand–silt tailings mixtures.” Can. Geotech. J. 59 (8): 1348–1357. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2021-0356.
Georgiannou, V. N., M. R. Coop, F. N. Altuhafi, and D. I. Lefas. 2018. “Compression and strength characteristics of two silts of low and high plasticity.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 144 (7): 04018041. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001891.
Goudarzy, M., D. Sarkar, W. Lieske, and T. Wichtmann. 2022. “Influence of plastic fines content on the liquefaction susceptibility of sands: Monotonic loading.” Acta Geotech. 17: 1719. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-021-01283-w.
Hong, Z.-S., J. Yin, and Y.-J. Cui. 2010. “Compression behaviour of reconstituted soils at high initial water contents.” Géotechnique 60 (9): 691–700. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.09.P.059.
Jia, R., H. Lei, and K. Li. 2020. “Compressibility and microstructure evolution of different reconstituted clays during 1D compression.” Int. J. Geomech. 20 (10): 04020181. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001830.
Kaothon, P., S.-H. Lee, Y.-T. Choi, and C.-Y. Yune. 2022. “The effect of fines content on compressional behavior when using sand–kaolinite mixtures as embankment materials.” Appl. Sci. 12: 6050. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12126050.
Li, W., and M. R. Coop. 2019. “Mechanical behaviour of Panzhihua iron tailings.” Can. Geotech. J. 56 (3): 420–435. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2018-0032.
Lupini, J. F., A. E. Skinner, and P. R. Vaughan. 1981. “The drained residual strength of cohesive soils.” Géotechnique 31 (2): 181–213. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1981.31.2.181.
Ma, L., A. C. F. Chiu, Y. P. Cheng, and Y. Z. Ren. 2021. “Effects of particle breakage on the compression behaviour of gap graded carbonate sand–silt mixtures.” Géotechnique Lett. 11: 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgele.20.00033.
Mahmoudi, Y., A. C. Taiba, and M. Belkhatir. 2024. “Comparative study of stress history effects on shear deformation relations of sands from the Mediterranean region integrating specimen preparation techniques.” Int. J. Geomech. 24 (2): 04023285. https://doi.org/10.1061/IJGNAI.GMENG-8710.
Mahmoudi, Y., A. C. Taiba, L. Hazout, and M. Belkhatir. 2022a. “Comprehensive laboratory study on stress–strain of granular soils at constant global void ratio: Combined effects of fabrics and silt content.” Acta Geotech. 17: 3269–3292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-022-01480-1.
Mahmoudi, Y., A. Cherif Taiba, M. Belkhatir, and T. Schanz. 2016. “Experimental investigation on undrained shear behavior of overconsolidated sand-silt mixtures: Effect of sample reconstitution.” Geotech. Test. J. 39 (3): 515–523. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ20140183.
Mahmoudi, Y., A. Cherif Taiba, L. Hazout, M. Belkhatir, and W. Baille. 2020. “Packing density and overconsolidation ratio effects on the mechanical response of granular soils.” Geotech. Geol. Eng. J. 38: 723–742. https://doi.org/DOI 10.1007/s10706-019-01061-2.
Mahmoudi, Y., A. Cherif Taiba, L. Hazout, M. Belkhatir, W. Baille, and T. Wichtmann. 2022b. “Characterization of mechanical behavior of binary granular assemblies through the equivalent void ratio and equivalent state parameter.” Eur. J. Environ. Civ. Eng. 26 (7): 2869–2897. https://doi.org/Doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2020.1775708.
Martins, F. B., L. A. Bressani, M. R. Coop, and A. V. D. Bica. 2001. “Some aspects of the compressibility behaviour of a clayey sand.” Can. Geotech. J. 38 (6): 1177–1186. https://doi.org/10.1139/t01-048.
McGeary, R. K. 1961. “Mechanical packing of spherical particles.” J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 44 (10): 513–522. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1151-2916.1961.tb13716.x.
Monkul, M. M., S. B. Kendir, and Y. E. Tütüncü. 2021. “Combined effect of fines content and uniformity coefficient on cyclic liquefaction resistance of silty sands.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 151: 106999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.106999.
Monkul, M. M., and G. Ozden. 2007. “Compressional behavior of clayey sand and transition fines content.” Eng. Geol. 89: 195–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2006.10.001.
Monkul, M. M., and J. A. Yamamuro. 2011. “Influence of silt size and content on liquefaction behavior of sands.” Can. Geotech. J. 48: 931–942. https://doi.org/10.1139/t11-001.
Mitchell, J. K. 1993. Fundamentals of soil behavior. New York: Wiley.
Ng, C. W. W., D. B. Akinniyi, and C. Zhou. 2020. “Influence of structure on the compression and shear behaviour of a saturated lateritic clay.” Acta Geotech. 15: 3433–3441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-020-00981-1.
Ni, Q., T. S. Tan, G. R. Dasari, and D. W. Hight. 2004. “Contribution of fines to the compressive strength of mixed soils.” Géotechnique 54 (9): 561–569. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2004.54.9.561.
Rahman, M. M., S. R. Lo, and C. T. Gnanendran. 2008. “On equivalent granular void ratio and steady state behaviour of loose sand with fines.” Can. Geotech. J. 45 (10): 1439–1456. https://doi.org/10.1139/T08-064.
Rawat, P., and S. Mohanty. 2023. “One-dimensional compressibility study on fiber-reinforced municipal solid waste (MSW fines).” Indian Geotech. J. 53: 465–472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-022-00679-z.
Shi, X. S., and J. Zhao. 2020. “Practical estimation of compression behavior of clayey/silty sands using equivalent void-ratio concept.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 146 (6): 04020046. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002267.
Taylor, D. 1948. Fundamentals of soil mechanics. New York: Chapman and Hall.
Tiwari, B., G. Ye, M. Li, U. Khalid, and S. K. Yadav. 2020. “Strength and dilatancy behaviors of deep sands in Shanghai with a focus on grain size and shape effect.” J. Rock Mech. Geotech. Eng. 12 (6): 1214–1225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2020.01.010.
Theron, M. 2004. “The effect of particle shape on the behaviour of gold tailings.” Ph.D. thesis, School of Civil Engineering and the Environment, Univ. of Southampton.
Thevanayagam, S. 1998. “Effect of fines and confining stress on undrained shear strength of silty sands.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 124 (6): 479–491. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1998)124:6(479).
Thevanayagam, S. 2001. Role of intergranular contacts on the mechanisms causing liquefaction and slope failures in silty sands. Annual Project Summary Report, USGS Award Number: 01HQGR0032. Reston, VA: USGS, Dept. of Interior.
Tong, C. X., Z. L. Dong, Q. Sun, S. Zhang, J. X. Zheng, and D. Sheng. 2022. “On compression behavior and particle breakage of carbonate silty sands.” Eng. Geol. 297: 106492. https://doi.org/DOI.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2021.106492.
Vaid, Y. P., S. Sivathayalan, and D. Stedman. 1999. “Influence of specimen-reconstituting method on the undrained response of sand.” Geotech. Test. J. 22 (3): 187–195. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ11110J.
Xiao, Y., L. Long, T. M. Matthew Evans, H. Zhou, H. Liu, and A. W. Stuedlein. 2019. “Effect of particle shape on stress-dilatancy responses of medium-dense sands.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 145 (2): 04018105. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001994.
Wang, H., Y.-J. Cui, F. Zhang, and J. Liu. 2022. “Effect of grain breakage on the compressibility of soils.” Acta Geotech. 17: 769–778. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-021-01256-z.
Xu, D.-S., M. Huang, and Y. Zhou. 2020. “One-dimensional compression behavior of calcareous sand and marine clay mixtures.” Int. J. Geomech. 20 (9): 04020137. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001763.
Yang, J., L. M. Wei, and B. B. Dai. 2015. “State variables for silty sands: Global void ratio or skeleton void ratio?.” Soils Found. 55 (1): 99–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2014.12.008.
Yang, S. L., R. Sandven, and L. Grande. 2006. “Instability of sand-silt mixtures.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 26: 183–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2004.11.027.
Yang, Y., C. Zhang, R. Wang, M. Jiang, and Y. Tian. 2021. “Engineering properties of the compressibility and crushing characteristics of transitional soils mixed with silicate and carbonate sands.” Eng. Geol. 292: 106246. https://doi.org/DOI.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2021.106246.
Yin, J., M. Coop, and Y. Miao. 2013. “Intrinsic compression behavior of remolded and reconstituted clays-reappraisal.” Open J. Civ. Eng. 3: 8–12. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojce.2013.33B002.
Zeng, K., and H. Liu. 2023. “Experimental study on the time-dependent oedometric compression behavior of calcareous sand.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 149 (5). https://doi.org/10.1061/JGGEFK.GTENG-10739.
Zeng, L.-L., Z.-S. Hong, and Y.-F. Gao. 2017. “Practical estimation of compression behaviour of dredged clays with three physical parameters.” Eng. Geol. 217: 102–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2016.12.013.
Zeng, Y., X. Shi, W. Chen, and W. Feng. 2023. “Equivalent compression curve for clay–sand mixtures using equivalent void-ratio concept.” Int. J. Geomech. 23 (2): 06022039. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0002643.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to International Journal of Geomechanics
International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 24Issue 9September 2024

History

Received: Oct 10, 2023
Accepted: Feb 27, 2024
Published online: Jun 27, 2024
Published in print: Sep 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Nov 27, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Youcef Mahmoudi [email protected]
Associate Professor, Laboratory of Material Sciences and Environment, Hassiba Ben Bouali Univ., Chlef 02000, Algeria (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Abdellah Cherif Taiba [email protected]
Associate Professor, Laboratory of Material Sciences and Environment, Hassiba Ben Bouali Univ., Chlef 02000, Algeria; Laboratory of Architecture, Cities and Environment, Hassiba Ben Bouali Univ., Chlef 02000, Algeria. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Laboratory of Material Sciences and Environment, Hassiba Ben Bouali Univ., Chlef 02000, Algeria; Alexander von Humboldt Foundation Researcher, Berlin 10117, Germany. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0701-2605. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share