Moment-Based Analysis of Onshore Wind Turbine Generator Foundation–Soil Response
Publication: International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 24, Issue 3
Abstract
In this study, we instrument the foundations and towers for two onshore shallow wind turbine generators (WTGs) to evaluate foundation response, quantify in-service loads, and assess the assumptions behind WTG foundation design calculations. Measurements of pressure at the soil–foundation interface, soil strain just below foundation level, and tower moments over long periods provide insights into the operational moments experienced by the tower and the load transfer mechanisms to the foundation system. The results of this study have implications for design practices in three distinct ways: (1) the assessment of rotational stiffness calculation assumptions, (2) the evaluation of pressure distribution used in the bearing capacity formulation, and (3) the estimation of tower loads used in the tower and anchor bolt design. Our observations show that the induced overturning moments correlate well with incipient wind speeds and directions and the associated soil pressure and strain responses. The overturning moments and the response parameters relate linearly within the spectrum of measured magnitudes. However, the pressure distribution across the foundation footprint does not monotonically increase or decrease with distance from the neutral axis of the foundation base (e.g., the pressure sensed at the foundation's center close to the foundation is between 1.5 and 2 times greater than the pressures sensed at the edges). In addition, the measured soil strain as a function of cyclic moments shows that the in-service cyclic shear strains are less than 1.4 × 10−5 (i.e., two orders of magnitude smaller than the assumed design strain level). Finally, the spectrum of cyclic moments follows a semilog trend, thus indicating that operational and nonoperational loads dominate the fatigue load spectrum. Our study suggests that adequately designed WTG foundations on competent fine-grained soil result in very low operational soil shear stresses and strains, which might indicate that the current design practices are too conservative in nature. Field measurements establish load spectrums for cyclic fatigue loads for the long-term operational conditions of WTGs.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data, models, or codes supporting this study's findings are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Acknowledgments
The National Science Foundation under Grant No. 1238963 and the US Department of Energy under award number DE-EE0000534 supported the material presented in this study. However, any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this study are those of the authors. They might not reflect the views of the National Science Foundation or the US Department of Energy.
Notation
The following symbols are used in this paper:
- A
- foundation surface area;
- c
- distance to the neutral axis;
- dM
- change in moment across the two TSG levels;
- dz
- vertical distance between two sets of strain gauges;
- E
- Young's modulus;
- e
- eccentricity;
- G
- shear modulus;
- I
- moment of inertia;
- rotational stiffness;
- M
- moment;
- MDL
- distributed wind load moment;
- MFB
- force on blades moment;
- V
- shear force;
- v
- Poisson's ratio;
- γ
- shear strain;
- α
- Weibull distribution parameter;
- β
- Weibull distribution parameter;
- WT
- total vertical generator and tower weight;
- σW
- stress caused by the turbine and tower weight;
- axial strain; and
- θ
- angle of rotation in radians.
References
ACP (American Clean Power). 2022 Land-based Wind Power Facts. Accessed July 25, 2022. https://cleanpower.org/facts/wind-power/.
Adekunte, A. O., K. Gavin, and B. Casey. 2005. “Comparison of monitored wind turbine behaviour with design prediction.” In Proc., Presented at the Int’l Conf., on Soil-Structure Interaction: Calculation Methods and Engineering Practice. St. Petersburg, Russia: St. Petersburg-Moscow.
ASTM. 2007. Standard test method for particle-size analysis of soils. ASTM D422. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2012a. Standard test methods for laboratory compaction characteristics of soil using standard effort. ASTM D698. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2012b. Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil Using Modified Effort (56,000 ft-lbf/ft3 (2,700 kN-m/m3)). D1557-12. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2015. Standard practice for thin-walled tube sampling of fine-grained soils for geotechnical purposes. ASTM D1587. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2017a. Standard practice for classification of soils for engineering purposes (unified soil classification system). ASTM D2487. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2017b. Standard test methods for liquid limit, plastic limit, and plasticity index of soils. ASTM D4318. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2018. Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Determination of Density (Unit Weight) of Soil Specimens. D7263-09. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
AWEA (American Wind Energy Association). 2011. Recommended practice for compliance of large land-based wind turbine support structures. Reston, VA: AWEA.
Cho, G., J. Dodds, and J. C. Santamarina. 2006. “Particle shape effects on packing density, stiffness, and strength: Natural and crushed sands.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 132 (5): 591–602. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2006)132:5(591).
Czerniak, E. 1969. “Foundation design guide for stacks and towers.” Hydrocarbon Process. 1969: 95–114.
Diaz-Rodriguez, J. A., and J. A. Lopez-Molina. 2008. “Strain thresholds in soil dynamics.” In Proc., Paper Presented at 14th World Conf., on Earthquake Engineering. Beijing, China: International Association for Earthquake Engineering/Chinese Association of Earthquake Engineering.
DNV (Det Norske Veritas). 2002. Guidelines for design of wind turbines. Copenhagen: Risø National Laboratory.
DOE. 2021. Land-based wind market report: 2021 edition. DOE. Accessed October 10, 2021. https://emp.lbl.gov/sites/default/files/land-based_wind_market_report_2021_edition_final.pdf.
Dunnicliff, J. 1988. Geotechnical instrumentation for monitoring field performance, 577. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
EIA (Energy Information Administration). 2022. “US Energy Information Administration EIA.” Accessed July 25, 2022. https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/wind/electricity-generation-from-wind.php.
Elsabee, F., and J. P. Murray. 1977. Dynamic behavior of embedded foundations. Research Rep. R77–33. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Geokon Instruction Manual. 2023a. Model 3500, 3510, 3515, 3600 earth pressure cells. Lebanon, NH: Geokon Inc. Accessed April 12, 2023. https://www.geokon.com/content/manuals/3500_Earth_Pressure_Cells.pdf.
Geokon Instruction Manual. 2023b. Model 4430 VW deformation meter. Lebanon, NH: Geokon Inc. Accessed April 12, 2023. https://www.geokon.com/content/manuals/4430_Deformation_Meter.pdf.
Harte, M., B. Basu, and S. R. K. Nielsen. 2012. “Dynamic analysis of wind turbines including soil–structue interaction.” Eng. Struct. 45: 509–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.06.041.
Lockwood, J., M. Chase, and T. McRory. 2016. “Higher wind towers on the rise.” Concr. Int. 2016: 29–32.
Madaschi, A., A. Gajo, M. Molinari, and D. Zonta. 2016. “Characterization of the dynamic behavior of shallow foundations with full-scale dynamic tests.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 14 (7): 04016026. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001446.
Mawer, B. W., and D. Kalumba. 2016. “Stiffness consideration of local wind turbine gravity foundations.” In Proc., 1st Southern African Geotechnical Conf. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Morgan, K., and E. Ntambakwa. 2008. “Wind turbine foundation behavior and design considerations.” In Presented at AWEA Annual Conf. Exhibition, 1–14. American Wind Houston, Texas: American Wind Energy Association.
Ntambakwa, E. 2009. “Seismic forces for wind turbine foundations.” In Presentation Given at Windpower 2009. Chicago, IL: WindPower.
Ntambakwa, E., H. Yu, C. Guzman, and M. Rogers. 2016. “Geotechnical design considerations for onshore wind turbine shallow foundations.” In Geotechnical and Structural Engineering Congress. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Omega. 2023. “KFH series pre-wired strain gauges manual.” Accessed April 12, 2023. https://assets.omega.com/pdf/test-and-measurement-equipment/strain-gauges/KFH.pdf.
Rajaei, M., and J. M. Tinjum. 2013. “Life cycle assessment of energy balance and emission of a wind energy plant.” Geotech. Geol. Eng. 31 (6): 1663–1670. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-013-9637-3.
Richart, F. E., J. R. Hall, and R. D. Woods. 1970. Vibrations of soils and foundations. Englewood Cliff, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Santamarina, C. J. 2001. “Soil behavior at the microscale: Particle forces.” In Proc. Symp. Soil Behavior and Soft Ground Construction, in honor of Charles C. Ladd, 25–56. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Santamarina, C. J., A. Klein, and M. A. Fam. 2001. Soils and waves: Particulate materials behavior, characterization and process monitoring, 488. Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons.
Tinjum, J. M., and R. W. Christensen. 2010. “Site investigation, characterization and assessment for wind turbine design and construction.” In Wind energy systems, edited by J. D. Sorensen and J. N. Sorensen, 26–45. Sawston, UK: Woodhead.
Tinjum, J. M., and P. Lang. 2012. “Wind energy geotechnics.” Geo-Strata 16: 18–26.
USGS NWIS. 2023. The United States Geological Survey National Water Information System. Accessed May 4, 2023. https://nwis.waterdata.usgs.gov/il/nwis/gwlevels.
USWTDB (United States Wind Turbine Database). 2022. The United States Wind Energy Database. Accessed July 25, 2022. https://eerscmap.usgs.gov/uswtdb/viewer/#3/37.25/-96.25.
Vucetic, M., and R. Dobry. 1991. “Effect of soil plasticity on cyclic response.” J. Geotech. Eng. 117 (1): 89–107. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1991)117:1(89).
Yilmaz, M., J. Eun, J. M. Tinjum, and D. Fratta. 2021. “In-service response of shallow onshore wind turbine generator foundation.” Geotech. Geol. Eng. 40 (2), 977–994. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-021-01938-1.
Yilmaz, M., S. Schubert, J. M. Tinjum, and D. Fratta. 2014. Foundation soil response to wind turbine generator loading, 234. Geo-Congress 2014 Congress. Atlanta, GA: Geotechnical Special Publication. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784413272.146.
Zhang, J., R. D. Andrus, and C. H. Juang. 2005. “Normalized shear modulus and material damping ratio relationships.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 131 (4): 453–464. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:4(453).
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 24 • Issue 3 • March 2024
Copyright
© 2024 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Nov 8, 2022
Accepted: Sep 10, 2023
Published online: Jan 11, 2024
Published in print: Mar 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Jun 11, 2024
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.