Influence of Surface Roughness Uncertainties on Design of Structures with Open and Suburban Exposures
Publication: ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
Volume 8, Issue 1
Abstract
Following an investigation into the causes of a 40% difference between estimates of structural response to wind by two reputable wind engineering laboratories, the National Institute of Standards and Technology recommended the development of nationally accepted performance standards based on sound technical methods. The development of such standards requires the use of an uncertainty quantification procedure applicable to the response of structures subjected to wind loads. As part of this development, this paper considers the effect of uncertainty in the subjective determinations of the surface roughness lengths at sites with open and suburban exposures. Extensive data developed jointly by the University of Florida, Applied Research Associates, and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)/National Hurricane Center were used in conjunction with analytic and probabilistic tools to quantify the effect of this uncertainty on the estimation of structural response to wind. It was found that neglecting this uncertainty can result in underestimation of the response by as much as 45%. It is recommended that techniques for the objective measurement of surface roughness lengths be used for structural design purposes and that, in the absence of such measurements, the effect of uncertainty in the determination of surface roughness be accounted for in structural design.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data, models, or code generated or used during the study are available in a repository online (www.nist.gov/wind) in accordance with funder data retention policies.
References
ASCE. 2005. Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. Reston, VA: ASCE.
ASCE. 2010. Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. Reston, VA: ASCE.
ASCE. 2016. Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. Reston, VA: ASCE.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). 2005 Comite Europeen de Normalisation. EN 1991-1-4. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
Coffman, B. J., J. A. Main, D. Duthinh, and E. Simiu. 2010. “Wind effects on low-rise metal buildings: Database-assisted design versus ASCE 7-05 standard estimates.” J. Struct. Eng. 136 (6): 744–748.
Duthinh, D., A. L. Pintar, and E. Simiu. 2017. “Estimating peaks of stationary random processes: A peaks-over-threshold approach.” ASCE-ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Eng. Syst. Part A: Civ. Eng. 3 (4): 04017028. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJRUA6.0000933.
Efron, B., and R. J. Tibshirani. 1994. An introduction to the bootstrap. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Ellingwood, B., T. V. Galambos, J. G. MacGregor, and C. A. Cornell. 1980. Development of a probability-based load criterion for American national standard A58: NBS special publication 577. Washington, DC: National Bureau of Standards.
Fritz, W., B. Benkiewicz, B. Cui, O. Flamand, T. Ho, H. Kikitsu, C. Letchford, and E. Simiu. 2008. “International comparison of wind tunnel estimates of wind effects on low-rise buildings: Test related uncertainties.” J. Struct. Eng. 134 (12): 1887–1890. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2008)134:12(1887).
Habte, E., A. Chowdhury Gan, D. Yeo, and E. Simiu. 2015. “Wind directionality factors for nonhurricane and hurricane-prone regions.” J. Struct. Eng. 141 (8): 04014208. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001180.
Lieblein, J. 1974. Efficient methods of extreme-value methodology. NBSIR-602. Washington, DC: National Bureau of Standards.
Masters, F. J., P. J. Vickery, P. Bacon, and E. N. Rappaport. 2010. “Toward objective, standardized intensity estimates from surface wind speed observations.” Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 91 (12): 1665. https://doi.org/10.1175/2010BAMS2942.1.
McAllister, T., N. Wang, and B. R. Ellingwood. 2018. “Risk-informed mean recurrence intervals for update wind maps in ASCE 7-16.” J. Struct. Eng. 144 (5). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002011.
NIST. 2005. “WTC disaster study recommendations.” https://www.nist.gov/topics/disaster-failure-studies/world-trade-center-disaster-study/recommendations.
Simiu, E., M. J. Changery, and J. J. Filliben. 1979. Extreme wind speeds at 129 stations in the contiguous United States: Building science series 118. Washington, DC: National Bureau of Standards.
Simiu, E., P. Vickery, and A. Kareem. 2007. “Relation between Saffir–Simpson hurricane scale wind speeds and peak 3-s gust speeds over open Terrain.” J. Struct. Eng. 34 (5): 1043–1045. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:7(1043).
Simiu, E., and D. Yeo. 2019. Wind effects on structures: Modern structural design for wind. 4th ed. Hoboken: Wiley/Blackwell.
SOM (Skidmore Owings and Merrill). 2004. “World trade center response to wind, NCSTAR1–2, Appendix D.” http://wtc.nist.gov/NCSTAR1/NCSTAR1-2index.htm.
Vickery, P. J., D. Wadhera, J. Galsworthy, J. A. Peterka, P. A. Irwin, and L. A. Griffis. 2010. “Ultimate wind load design gust wind speeds in the United States for use in ASCE-7.” J. Struct. Eng. 136 (5): 613–625. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000145.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
Volume 8 • Issue 1 • March 2022
Copyright
© 2021 Published by American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Mar 15, 2021
Accepted: Aug 13, 2021
Published online: Oct 18, 2021
Published in print: Mar 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Mar 18, 2022
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.