Case Studies
Jun 30, 2021

Dependence Structures of Soil Parameters in Sandy Clay

Publication: ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
Volume 7, Issue 3

Abstract

The probability density distribution of soil parameters is of ultimate importance in reliability analysis of a geotechnical structure. Constructing the probability density function often needs a large number of experimental data, which is not easily obtained. The dependence structure between two different soil parameters may provide quantitative correlation between the parameters. This study investigated the probability density distribution and the dependence structure of several soil parameters (i.e., cohesion, friction angle, water content, compression modulus, and void ratio) using a large number of data obtained in a construction site in Shenzhen, China. The dependence structure of three random variables is investigated for the first time. An example on estimating bearing capacity and settlement of a shallow foundation is demonstrated using the constructed dependence structures for reliability analysis. The results show that the optimal probability distributions for cohesion and friction angle are normal distributions. The compression modulus and the void ratio follow lognormal distribution. The water content follows a gamma distribution. The Frank copula is the best dependence structure of cohesion and friction angle. The Clayton copula is the best dependence structure of compression modulus, void ratio, and water content. The results show that different dependence structures of soil parameters can significantly affect the probability of failure. The traditional Gaussian copula may overestimate the failure probability in terms of bearing capacity.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request (All data of sandy clay parameters, code for calculating AIC values, code for constructing dependence structures, etc.).

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by Shenzhen Peacock Technology Innovation Project (Grant No. KQJSCX20180328165808449) and Shenzhen Science and Technology Research & Development Fund (Grant No. JCYJ20180507183854827).

References

Akaike, H. 1974. “A new look at the statistical model identification.” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 19 (6): 716–723. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705.
Babaoglu, Y., and P. Simms. 2020. “Improving hydraulic conductivity estimation for soft clay soils, sediments, or tailings using predictors measured at high-void ratio.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 146 (10): 06020016. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002344.
Baecher, G. B., and J. T. Christian. 2003. Reliability and statistics in geotechnical engineering. New York: Wiley.
Chang, C. S., J. Y. Wang, and L. Ge. 2016. “Maximum and minimum void ratios for sand-silt mixtures.” Eng. Geol. 211 (Aug): 7–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2016.06.022.
Chinese Standard. 2011. Code for design of building foundation. Beijing: Chinese Standard.
Duncan, J. M. 2000. “Factors of safety and reliability in geotechnical engineering.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 126 (4): 307–316. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2000)126:4(307).
Engle, R. F., and G. R. Gloria. 1991. “Semiparametric ARCH models.” J. Bus. Econ. Stat. 4 (9): 345–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/07350015.1991.10509863.
Fenton, G. A., D. V. Griffiths, and X. Zhang. 2008. “Load and resistance factor design of shallow foundations against bearing failure.” Can. Geotech. J. 45 (11): 1556–1571. https://doi.org/10.1139/T08-061.
Genest, C., and A. C. Favre. 2007. “Everything you always want to know about copula modeling but were afraid to ask.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 4 (12): 347–368. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2007)12:4(347).
Hollander, M., D. A. Wolfe, and E. Chicken. 2013. Nonparametric statistical methods. New York: Wiley.
Hu, W., X. Y. Jia, and X. Y. Zhu. 2020. “Influence of moisture content on intelligent soil compaction.” Autom. Constr. 113 (May): 103141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103141.
Huang, H. W., L. Xiao, and D. M. Zhang. 2017. “Influence of spatial variability of soil Young’s modulus on tunnel convergence in soft soils.” Eng. Geol. 228 (Oct): 357–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2017.09.011.
Juang, C. H., J. Zhang, M. F. Shen, and J. Z. Hu. 2019. “Probabilistic methods for unified treatment of geotechnical and geological uncertainties in a geotechnical analysis.” Eng. Geol. 249 (Jan): 148–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.12.010.
Li, D. Q., X. S. Tang, and K. K. Phoon. 2013. “Bivariate simulation using copula and its application to probabilistic pile settlement analysis.” Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech. 37 (6): 597–617. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.1112.
Li, D. Q., L. Zhang, W. Zhou, and X. S. Tang. 2015. “Bivariate distribution of shear strength parameters using copulas and its impact on geotechnical system reliability.” Comput. Geotech. 68 (Jul): 184–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2015.04.002.
Lipinski, M. J., and M. K. Wdowska. 2019. “Evaluation of void ratio of sands with various amount of fines on the basis of shear wave velocity measurement.” IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 471 (4): 042026. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/471/4/042026.
Liu, W. L., L. X. Cai, Y. Y. Wang, and H. Wu. 2020. “Reliability analysis of operational metro tunnel based on a dynamic Bayesian copula model.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 34 (3): 05020002. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000886.
Low, B. K. 2007. “Reliability analysis of rock slopes involving correlated nonnormals.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 44 (6): 922–935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2007.02.008.
Malkawi, A. I. H., W. F. Hassan, and F. A. Abdulla. 2000. “Uncertainty and reliability analysis applied to slope stability.” Struct. Saf. 22 (2): 161–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4730(00)00006-0.
Mari, D. D., and S. Kotz. 2001. Correlation and dependence. London: Imperial College Press.
Murthy, V. N. S. 2002. Geotechnical engineering: Principles and practices of soil mechanics and foundation engineering. London: Taylor & Francis.
Nataf, A. 1962. “Détermination des distributions de probabilités dont les marges sont données.” [In French.] C. R. Acad. Sci. 255: 42–43.
Nelsen, R. B. 2006. An introduction to copulas. New York: Springer.
Orr, T. L. L., and E. R. Farrell. 2012. Geotechnical design to Eurocode 7. New York: Springer.
Parker, C., A. Simon, and C. R. Thorne. 2008. “The effects of variability in bank material properties on riverbank stability: Goodwin Greek, Mississippi.” Geomorphology 101 (4): 533–543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2008.02.007.
Saraiva, E., A. Suzuki, and L. A. Milan. 2018. “Bayesian computational methods for sampling from the posterior distribution of a bivariate survival model, based on AMH copula in the presence of right-censored data.” Entropy 20 (9): 642. https://doi.org/10.3390/e20090642.
Sawangsuriya, A., T. B. Edil, and P. J. Bosscher. 2008. “Modulus-suction-moisture relationship for compacted soils.” Can. Geotech. J. 45 (7): 973–983. https://doi.org/10.1139/T08-033.
Sklar, A. 1959. “Fonctions de répartition à n dimensions et leurs marges.” [In French.] Publ. Inst. Stat. Univ. Paris 8: 229–231.
Tamimi, S., B. Amadei, and D. M. Frangopol. 1989. “Monte Carlo simulation of rock slope reliability.” Comput. Struct. 33 (6): 1495–1505. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(89)90489-6.
Tang, X. S., D. Q. Li, C. B. Zhou, and L. M. Zhang. 2013. “Bivariate distribution models using copulas for reliability analysis.” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part O: J. Risk Reliab. 227 (5): 499–512. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748006X13481928.
Tobutt, D. C. 1982. “Monte Carlo simulation methods for slope stability.” Comput. Geosci. 8 (2): 199–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/0098-3004(82)90021-8.
Wang, M. X., X. S. Tang, D. Q. Li, and X. H. Qi. 2020. “Subset simulation for efficient slope reliability analysis involving copula-based cross-correlated random fields.” Comput. Geotech. 118 (Feb): 103326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2019.103326.
Wu, X. Z. 2015. “Modelling dependence structures of soil shear strength data with bivariate copulas and applications to geotechnical reliability analysis.” Soils Found. 55 (5): 1243–1258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2015.09.023.
Xing, X. F., C. L. Wu, J. H. Li, X. Y. Li, L. M. Zhang, and R. J. He. 2021. “Susceptibility assessment for rainfall-induced landslides using a revised logistic regression method.” Nat. Hazard. 106 (1): 97–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-04452-4.
Xu, Z. X., and X. P. Zhou. 2018. “Three-dimensional reliability analysis of seismic slopes using the copula-based sampling method.” Eng. Geol. 242 (Aug): 81–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.05.020.
Yang, H. Q., L. L. Zhang, J. F. Xue, J. Zhang, and X. Li. 2019. “Unsaturated soil slope characterization with Karhunen–Loève and polynomial chaos via Bayesian approach.” Eng. Comput. 35 (1): 337–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-018-0610-x.
Zhang, D. M., J. Z. Zhang, H. W. Huang, C. C. Qi, and C. Y. Chang. 2020. “Machine-learning-based prediction of soil compression modulus with application of 1D settlement.” J. Zhejiang Univ.-Sci. A 21 (6): 430–444. https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.A1900515.
Zhang, L., X. S. Tang, and D. Q. Li. 2013a. “Bivariate distribution model of soil shear strength parameter using copula.” [In Chinese.] J. Civ. Eng. Manage. 30 (2): 11–17.
Zhang, P. C., L. S. Tang, and L. Q. Jiang. 2013b. “Research of quantitative relations of matric suction with water content and dry density.” [In Chinese.] Supplement, Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 32 (S1): 2792–2797.
Zhang, Y., T. G. António, and B. Michael. 2019. “Reliability analysis with consideration of asymmetrically dependent variables: Discussion and application to geotechnical examples.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 185 (May): 261–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2018.12.025.
Zhou, X. L., G. Zhang, S. H. Hu, and J. Z. Li. 2019. “Optimal estimation of shear strength parameters based on copula theory coupling information diffusion technique.” Adv. Civ. Eng. 2019 (May): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8738969.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
Volume 7Issue 3September 2021

History

Received: Aug 19, 2020
Accepted: Apr 18, 2021
Published online: Jun 30, 2021
Published in print: Sep 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Nov 30, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

M.Phil. Student, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology (Shenzhen), Shenzhen University Town, Xili, Shenzhen 518055, China. Email: [email protected]
Chenglong Wu [email protected]
Post-doctoral Researcher, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology (Shenzhen), Shenzhen University Town, Xili, Shenzhen 518055, China. Email: [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology (Shenzhen), Shenzhen University Town, Xili, Shenzhen 518055, China. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology (Shenzhen), Shenzhen University Town, Xili, Shenzhen 518055, China (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • A comprehensive comparison of copula models and multivariate normal distribution for geo-material parametric data, Computers and Geotechnics, 10.1016/j.compgeo.2023.105777, 164, (105777), (2023).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share