ABSTRACT

A finite difference method (FDM) to material point method (MPM) transitioning model is applied to the well-known case study of the Lower San Fernando Dam (LSFD) failure during the 1971 San Fernando earthquake. This model uses an effective stress analysis in FDM during shaking, then a post-shaking total stress analysis in MPM to simulate undrained large-deformation response. Two advances in the Berkeley Geomechanics MPM code used for this case study are a nonconforming traction boundary for hydrostatic pressure and an adhesion boundary for modeling the interaction between the sliding mass and the reservoir bottom. The MPM runout model captures large deformation failure characteristics. Important quantitative metrics include remaining freeboard, crest loss, and upstream runout into the reservoir. Important qualitative aspects include shear banding, blocky features, and toe mass separation and bulging.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.

REFERENCES

Alsardi, A., and A. Yerro. 2022. “Coseismic site response and slope instability using periodic boundary conditions in the material point method.” J. Rock Mech. Geotech. Eng.
Cetin, K. O., R. B. Seed, R. E. Kayen, R. E. S. Moss, H. T. Bilge, M. Ilgac, and K. Chowdhury. 2018. “Examination of differences between three SPT-based seismic soil liquefaction triggering relationships.” Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 113: 75–86. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.03.013.
Chowdhury, K. H. 2019. Evaluation of the State of Practice Regarding Nonlinear Seismic Deformation Analyses of Embankment Dams Subject to Soil Liquefaction Based on Case Histories. University of California, Berkeley.
Feng, K., G. Wang, D. Huang, and F. Jin. 2021. “Material point method for large-deformation modeling of coseismic landslide and liquefaction-induced dam failure.” Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 150: 106907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.106907.
Hughes, T. J. R. 1980. “Generalization of selective integration procedures to anisotropic and nonlinear media.” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 15 (9): 1413–1418.
Ishihara, K. 1993. “Liquefaction and flow failure during earthquakes.” Geotechnique, 43 (3): 351–451. Thomas Telford Ltd.
Kumar, K., J. Salmond, S. Kularathna, C. Wilkes, E. Tjung, G. Biscontin, and K. Soga. 2019. “Scalable and modular material point method for large-scale simulations.”.
Ladd, C. C., and R. Foott. 1974. “A new design procedure for stability of soft clays.” J. Geotech. Eng. Div., 100 (GT7): 763–786. ASCE.
Liang, Y., J. Given, and K. Soga. 2023. “The imposition of nonconforming Neumann boundary condition in the material point method without boundary representation.” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 404: 115785. Elsevier.
Mitchell, J. K., et al. 2005. Fundamentals of soil behavior. John Wiley & Sons New York.
Seed, H. B., K. L. Lee, I. M. Idriss, and F. I. Makdisi. 1973. Analysis of the slides in the San Fernando dams during the earthquake of Feb. 9, 1971. University of California, Berkeley.
Seed, R. B., K. Chowdhury, E. Dawson, J. Weber, V. Perlea, K. Soga, and E. Y. S. Tjung. 2021. The Upper and Lower San Fernando Dams: 50 Years of Advances in Seismic Analysis of Dams Potentially Susceptible to Seismic Soil Liquefaction [Unpublished manuscript]. ASCE Seattle Section Geotechnical Group & Geo-Institute – Seattle Chapter.
Soga, K., E. Alonso, A. Yerro, K. Kumar, and S. Bandara. 2016. “Trends in large-deformation analysis of landslide mass movements with particular emphasis on the material point method.” Géotechnique, 66 (3): 248–273. Thomas Telford Ltd.
Steinbrugge Collection. 1971. NICEE Library, U.C. Berkeley.
Sulsky, D., Z. Chenb, and H. L. Schreyer. 1994. “A particle method for history-dependent materials.” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 118: 179–196.
Talbot, L. E. D., J. Given, E. Y. S. Tjung, Y. Liang, K. Chowdhury, R. B. Seed, and K. Soga. 2023. Modeling Large-Deformation Features of the Lower San Fernando Dam Failure with the Material Point Method [Unpublished manuscript].
Weber, J. P., R. B. Seed, J. M. Pestana, R. E. S. Moss, C. Nweke, T. T. Deger, and K. Chowdhury. 2015. Engineering Evaluation of Post-Liquefaction Strength. University of California, Berkeley.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Geo-Congress 2024
Geo-Congress 2024
Pages: 52 - 63

History

Published online: Feb 22, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Lauren E. D. Talbot, S.M.ASCE [email protected]
1Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Berkeley. Email: [email protected]
Joel Given, S.M.ASCE [email protected]
2Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Berkeley. Email: [email protected]
Yong Liang, Ph.D. [email protected]
3State Key Laboratory for Strength and Vibration of Mechanical Structures, School of Aerospace Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong Univ. Email: [email protected]
Ezra Y. S. Tjung, Ph.D., M.ASCE [email protected]
4Exponent, Inc., Oakland, CA; Calvin Institute of Technology, Jakarta, Indonesia. Email: [email protected]
Khaled Chowdhury, Ph.D., G.E., P.E. [email protected]
5South Pacific Division Dam Safety Production Center, United States Army Corps of Engineers, Sacramento District, Sacramento, CA. Email: [email protected]
Raymond Seed, Ph.D., M.ASCE [email protected]
6Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Berkeley. Email: [email protected]
Kenichi Soga, Ph.D., F.ASCE [email protected]
7Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Berkeley. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$82.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$82.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share