Chapter
Feb 22, 2024

Co-Seismic Landslide Mobility Assessment Using Machine Learning Models

Publication: Geo-Congress 2024

ABSTRACT

Landslide mobility is essential for landslide risk assessment because impact scales with the distance traveled by the landslide mass in many cases. This paper aims to quantify the mobility of landslides triggered by the Mw 6.5 Lefkada earthquake on November 17, 2015, and develop regression models for landslide travel distance. The study leverages a high-quality landslide inventory that includes the location, area, and volume of 716 landslides, with the source and entire area for each landslide mapped separately. Multivariate linear and machine learning models are used to predict landslide travel distance. The dependent variable, the 3D landslide travel distance, is calculated from the inventory with the digital elevation model. Independent variables include terrain characteristics, material strength, and permanent seismic displacements estimated from seismic displacement models. The results show that terrain characteristics correlate most strongly with landslide travel distances. Furthermore, the multivariate linear regression, random forest regression, and stochastic gradient descent regression have better prediction capacity than k-nearest neighbors’ and XGBoost regression.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.

REFERENCES

Altmann, A., Toloşi, L., Sander, O., and Lengauer, T. (2010). Permutation importance: a corrected feature importance measure. Bioinformatics, 26(10), 1340–1347.
Bray, J. D., and Macedo, J. (2019). Procedure for estimating shear-induced seismic slope displacement for shallow crustal earthquakes. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental engineering, 145(12), 04019106.
Bray, J. D., and Travasarou, T. (2007). Simplified procedure for estimating earthquake-induced deviatoric slope displacements. Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering, 133(4), 381–392.
Breiman, L. (2001). Random forests. Machine learning, 45, 5–32.
Chicco, D., Warrens, M. J., and Jurman, G. (2021). The coefficient of determination R-squared is more informative than SMAPE, MAE, MAPE, MSE and RMSE in regression analysis evaluation. PeerJ Computer Science, 7, e623.
Fenton, G. A., McLean, A., Nadim, F., and Griffiths, D. V. (2013). Landslide hazard assessment using digital elevation models. Canadian geotechnical journal, 50(6), 620–631.
Finlay, P. J., Mostyn, G. R., and Fell, R. (1999). Landslide risk assessment: prediction of travel distance. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 36(3), 556–562.
Gardner, W. A. (1984). Learning characteristics of stochastic-gradient-descent algorithms: A general study, analysis, and critique. Signal processing, 6(2), 113–133.
Gong, W., Zekkos, D., and Clark, M. (2022). Influence of Seismic Displacement Models on Landslide Prediction at the Egkremnoi Coastline During the 2015 Lefkada Earthquake. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Performance Based Design in Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering (Beijing 2022) (pp. 739–746). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Gong, W., Zekkos, D., and Clark, M. (2023). A pseudo-3D methodology for regional-scale back-analysis of earthquake-induced landslides, Engineering Geology https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2023.107277.
Guo, D., Hamada, M., He, C., Wang, Y., and Zou, Y. (2014). An empirical model for landslide travel distance prediction in Wenchuan earthquake area. Landslides, 11, 281–291.
Huang, J. R., and Zekkos, D. (2023). Effect of Machine Learning Algorithms on Detection of Landslides Caused by the 2015 Lefkada Earthquake. In Geo-Congress 2023 (pp. 347–356).
Jibson, R. W. (2007). Regression models for estimating coseismic landslide displacement. Engineering geology, 91(2-4), 209–218.
Kramer, O. (2013). K-nearest neighbors. Dimensionality reduction with unsupervised nearest neighbors, 13–23.
Legros, F. (2002). The mobility of long-runout landslides. Engineering geology, 63(3-4), 301–331.
Li, W., Yin, Y., Quan, X., and Zhang, H. (2019). Gene expression value prediction based on XGBoost algorithm. Frontiers in genetics, 10, 1077.
Macedo, J., Bray, J., Abrahamson, N., and Travasarou, T. (2018). Performance-based probabilistic seismic slope displacement procedure. Earthquake Spectra, 34(2), 673–695.
Maulud, D., and Abdulazeez, A. M. (2020). A review on linear regression comprehensive in machine learning. Journal of Applied Science and Technology Trends, 1(4), 140–147.
Miao, F., Wu, Y., Xie, Y., and Li, Y. (2018). Prediction of landslide displacement with step-like behavior based on multialgorithm optimization and a support vector regression model. Landslides, 15, 475–488.
Mohan, A., Singh, A. K., Kumar, B., and Dwivedi, R. (2021). Review on remote sensing methods for landslide detection using machine and deep learning. Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies, 32(7), e3998.
Nadim, F., Kjekstad, O., Peduzzi, P., Herold, C., and Jaedicke, C. (2006). Global landslide and avalanche hotspots. Landslides, 3, 159–173.
Newmark, N. M. (1965). Effects of earthquakes on dams and embankments. Geotechnique, 15(2), 139–160.
Rathje, E. M., and Antonakos, G. (2011). A unified model for predicting earthquake-induced sliding displacements of rigid and flexible slopes. Engineering Geology, 122(1-2), 51–60.
Rathje, E. M., and Saygili, G. (2009). Probabilistic assessment of earthquake-induced sliding displacements of natural slopes. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 42(1), 18–27.
Rathje, E. M., and Antonakos, G. (2011). A unified model for predicting earthquake-induced sliding displacements of rigid and flexible slopes. Engineering Geology, 122(1-2), 51–60.
Roback, K., Clark, M. K., West, A. J., Zekkos, D., Li, G., Gallen, S. F., and Godt, J. W. (2018). The size, distribution, and mobility of landslides caused by the 2015 Mw7. 8 Gorkha earthquake, Nepal. Geomorphology, 301, 121–138.
Saygili, G., and Rathje, E. M. (2008). Empirical predictive models for earthquake-induced sliding displacements of slopes. Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering, 134(6), 790–803.
Xu, Q., Li, H., He, Y., Liu, F., and Peng, D. (2019). Comparison of data-driven models of loess landslide runout distance estimation. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 78, 1281–1294.
Zekkos, D., Clark, M., Gong, W., Manousakis, J., and Greenwood, W. (2019). Landslides Driven by Extreme Events: Can We Learn More from More of Them?. GeoStrata Magazine Archive, 23(3), 44–51.
Zekkos, D., and Clark, M. (2020). Characterization of landslides and rock mass strength leveraging the 2015 Mw 6.5 Lefkada Earthquake in Greece (No. G17AP00088). US Geology Survey. National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program, Award.
Zhang, Y., Tang, J., Cheng, Y., Huang, L., Guo, F., Yin, X., and Li, N. (2022). Prediction of landslide displacement with dynamic features using intelligent approaches. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 32(3), 539–549.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Geo-Congress 2024
Geo-Congress 2024
Pages: 475 - 484

History

Published online: Feb 22, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Jhih-Rou Huang, S.M.ASCE [email protected]
1Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA. Email: [email protected]
Dimitrios Zekkos, Ph.D., P.E., M.ASCE
2Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA
Marin Clark, Ph.D.
3Dept. of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$106.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$106.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share