Chapter
Feb 22, 2024

MPM Coseismic Slope Runout Prediction Using the Intergranular Strain Anisotropy Hypoplastic Model

Publication: Geo-Congress 2024

ABSTRACT

The material point method (MPM) is an advanced particle-based numerical tool capable of modeling large deformations. However, its abilities to predict seismic site response, ground failure initiation, and post-failure consequences, including undrained conditions, have not been fully realized. This research aims to use recent MPM developments to simulate earthquake-triggered slope failures. As a novelty, an advanced constitutive model such as the intergranular strain anisotropy hypoplastic model is implemented in an effective-stress undrained MPM framework to simulate the hydromechanical response of dense and loose sand. First, an MPM simulation of a level-ground sand column is used to understand the system-level undrained response under simple sinusoidal excitation. Loose sand tends to liquefy under an increase in pore pressure, while dense sand exhibits a decrease in pore pressure. Second, a small-scale slope geometry is adopted whereby the runout investigation is conducted using void ratios ranging from 0.45 to 0.95. The framework shows promising system-level results, needing further validation using centrifuge experiments.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.

REFERENCES

Al-Kafaji, I. K. J. 2013. Formulation of a Dynamic Material Point Method (MPM) for Geomechanical Problems. PhD thesis, Universitat Stuttgart.
Alsardi, A., and Yerro, A. 2021. Runout modeling of earthquake-triggered landslides with the material point method. In IFCEE 2021 (pp. 21–31).
Alsardi, A., and Yerro, A. 2023. Coseismic site response and slope instability using periodic boundary conditions in the material point method. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 15(3), pp.641–658.
Alsardi, A., Copana, J., and Yerro, A. 2021. Modelling earthquake-triggered landslide runout with the material point method. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Geotechnical Engineering, 174(5), pp.563–576.
Bozorgnia, Y., Abrahamson, N. A., and Atik, L. A. 2014. NGA-West2 research project. Earthquake Spectra, 30(3): 973–987.
Bray, J. D., Macedo, J., and Travasarou, T. 2018. Simplified procedure for estimating seismic slope displacements for subduction zone earthquakes. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 144(3), p.04017124.
Dafalias, Y. F., and Manzari, M. T. 2004. Simple plasticity sand model accounting for fabric change effects. Journal of Engineering mechanics, 130(6), pp.622–634.
Duque, J., Yang, M., Fuentes, W., Mašín, D., and Taiebat, M. 2021. Characteristic limitations of advanced plasticity and hypoplasticity models for cyclic loading of sands. Acta Geotechnica, pp.1–23.
Feng, K., Wang, G., Huang, D., and Jin, F. 2021. Material point method for large-deformation modeling of coseismic landslide and liquefaction-induced dam failure. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 150, p.106907.
Fuentes, W., and Triantafyllidis, T. 2015. ISA model: a constitutive model for soils with yield surface in the intergranular strain space. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 39(11), pp.1235–1254.
Fuentes, W., Mercado, V., and Lascarro, C. 2018. Evaluation of the ISA-hypoplasticity constitutive model for the LEAP-2017 project. In Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics V: Numerical Modeling and Soil Structure Interaction (pp. 165–173). Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers.
Fuentes, W., Wichtmann, T., Gil, M., and Lascarro, C. 2020. ISA-Hypoplasticity accounting for cyclic mobility effects for liquefaction analysis. Acta Geotechnica, 15, pp.1513–1531.
Giridharan, S., Gowda, S., Stolle, D. F., and Moormann, C. 2020. Comparison of ubcsand and hypoplastic soil model predictions using the material point method. Soils and Foundations, 60(4), pp.989–1000.
Kohler, M., Stoecklin, A., and Puzrin, A. M. 2022. A MPM framework for large-deformation seismic response analysis. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 59(6), pp.1046–1060.
Kularathna, S., Liang, W., Zhao, T., Chandra, B., Zhao, J., and Soga, K. 2021. A semi‐implicit material point method based on fractional‐step method for saturated soil. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 45(10), pp.1405–1436.
Niemunis, A. 2008. Incremental Driver User’s manual. Available from https://soilmodels.com/idriver/.
Poblete, M., Fuentes, W., and Triantafyllidis, T. 2016. On the simulation of multidimensional cyclic loading with intergranular strain. Acta Geotechnica, 11(6), pp.1263–1285.
Sulsky, D., Chen, Z., and Schreyer, H. L. 1994. A particle method for history-dependent materials. Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering, 118(1-2), pp.179–196.
Von Wolffersdorff, P. A. 1996. A hypoplastic relation for granular materials with a predefined limit state surface. Mechanics of Cohesive‐frictional Materials: An International Journal on Experiments, Modelling and Computation of Materials and Structures, 1(3), pp.251–271.
Wichtmann, T., Fuentes, W., and Triantafyllidis, T. 2019. Inspection of three sophisticated constitutive models based on monotonic and cyclic tests on fine sand: Hypoplasticity vs. Sanisand vs. ISA. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 124, pp.172–183.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Geo-Congress 2024
Geo-Congress 2024
Pages: 203 - 212

History

Published online: Feb 22, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Abdelrahman Alsardi, S.M.ASCE [email protected]
1Graduate Student, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg. Email: [email protected]
Alba Yerro, Ph.D., M.ASCE [email protected]
2Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$106.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$106.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share