ABSTRACT

Transportation infrastructure systems such as pavements constructed near coastal areas suffer distress from sea level rise and hurricane storm surges due to the presence of weak subgrades of cohesionless geomaterials. Traditionally, ordinary Portland cement (OPC) is used to improve the subsoil properties and design a resilient foundation for coastal pavements. However, the production and use of OPCs are often associated with significant carbon dioxide emissions, which affects the long-term sustainability benefits of such applications. Recently, geopolymers (GPs) have gained major traction as an alternative sustainable construction material due to their ability to provide superior mechanical performance and lower carbon emissions than traditional stabilizers. Therefore, a research study was performed to evaluate the engineering properties of metakaolin-based GP as a stabilizer for cohesionless coastal soils. Laboratory studies, including unconfined compressive strength (UCS) test and repeated load triaxial (RLT) test on untreated, OPC-treated, and GP-treated soil specimens, were performed at different curing periods. Sustainability benefit assessments were performed using a unified framework considering the effects of embodied energy of production, environmental factors, and socioeconomic factors. UCS and RLT studies showed that 20% GP treatment was effective in significantly improving both strength and moduli values beyond three days of curing. Sustainability assessments indicated that the application of GP has comparable sustainability benefits as compared to OPC-treated soils. Overall, the application of GP was found to be an eco-friendly solution to enhance the properties of cohesionless geomaterials for the long-term serviceability of coastal pavement infrastructure.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.

REFERENCES

Biswas, N., Puppala, A. J., and Chakraborty, S. 2024. Experimental Studies and Sustainability Assessments of Quarry Dust for Chemical Treatment of Expansive Soils. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 47(1): 1–17. doi:https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ20220243.
Biswas, N., Puppala, A. J., and Chakraborty, S. 2023. Role of Nano- and Crystalline Silica to Accelerate Chemical Treatment of Problematic Soil. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 149(7). doi:https://doi.org/10.1061/JGGEFK.GTENG-10999.
Dai, A. 2011. Drought under global warming: A review. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 2(1): 45–65. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.81.
Das, J. T. 2018. Assessment of Sustainability and Resilience in Transportation Infrastructure Geotechnics. University of Texas at Arlington.
Das, J. T., Banerjee, A., Puppala, A. J., and Chakraborty, S. 2019. Sustainability and resilience in pavement infrastructure: a unified assessment framework. Environmental Geotechnics,: 1–13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1680/jenge.19.00035.
Duxson, P., Fernández-Jiménez, A., Provis, J. L., Lukey, G. C., Palomo, A., and Van Deventer, J. S. J. 2007. Geopolymer technology: The current state of the art. Journal of Materials Science, 42(9): 2917–2933. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-0637-z.
Da Fonseca, A. V., Cruz, R. C., and Consoli, N. C. 2009. Strength properties of sandy soil-cement admixtures. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 27(6): 681–686. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-009-9267-y.
Gartner, E. 2004. Industrially interesting approaches to “low-CO2” cements. Cement and Concrete Research, 34(9): 1489–1498. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.01.021.
Jang, J., Biswas, N., Puppala, A. J., Congress, S. S. C., Radovic, M., and Huang, O. 2022a. Evaluation of Geopolymer for Stabilization of Sulfate-Rich Expansive Soils for Supporting Pavement Infrastructure. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2676(9): 036119812210866. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981221086650.
Jang, J., Puppala, A. J., Biswas, N., Chakraborty, S., and Radovic, M. 2022b. Utilization of Metakaolin-Based Geopolymers for Stabilization of Sulfate-Rich Expansive Soils. In Geo-Congress 2022. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA. pp. 222–231.
Jang, J., Puppala, A. J., Chakraborty, S., Biswas, N., Huang, O., and Radovic, M. 2021. Eco-Friendly Stabilization of Sulfate-Rich Expansive Soils Using Geopolymers for Transportation Infrastructure. In Tran-SET 2021. Austin, TX. pp. 223–231.
Kaur, K., Singh, J., and Kaur, M. 2018. Compressive strength of rice husk ash based geopolymer: The effect of alkaline activator. Construction and Building Materials, 169: 188–192. Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.02.200.
Kennedy, T. W., Smith, R., Holmgreen, R. J., and Tahmoressi, M. 1987. Evaluation of Lime and Cement Stabilization. Transportation Research Record, (1119): 11–25.
Mehenni, A., Cuisinier, O., and Masrouri, F. 2016. Impact of Lime, Cement, and Clay Treatments on the Internal Erosion of Compacted Soils. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 28(9). doi:https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001573.
Mindess, S., Young, J. F., and Darwin, D. 2003. Concrete. In 2nd edition. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Obuzor, G. N., Kinuthia, J. M., and Robinson, R. B. 2012. Soil stabilisation with lime-activated-GGBS—A mitigation to flooding effects on road structural layers/embankments constructed on floodplains. Engineering Geology, 151: 112–119. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2012.09.010.
Provis, J. L., and Van Deventer, J. S. J. 2009. Geopolymers: Structures, processing, properties and industrial applications. In Woodhead Publishing. Woodhead, Cambridge, UK.
da Rocha, C. G., Passuello, A., Consoli, N. C., Quiñónez Samaniego, R. A., and Kanazawa, N. M. 2016. Life cycle assessment for soil stabilization dosages: A study for the Paraguayan Chaco. Journal of Cleaner Production, 139: 309–318. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.219.
Samuel, R., Puppala, A. J., and Radovic, M. 2020. Sustainability benefits assessment of metakaolin-based geopolymer treatment of high plasticity clay. Sustainability, 12(24): 10495. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410495.
Santoni, R. L., Tingle, J. S., and Webster, S. L. 2002. Stabilization of silty sand with nontraditional additives. Transportation Research Record, 1787(1): 61–72. doi:https://doi.org/10.3141/1787-07.
Shafii, I., Medina-Cetina, Z., Shidlovskaya, A., and Briaud, J.-L. 2023. Relationship between soil erodibility and soil properties. Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering2, 149(1): https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002915.
Shayan, A. 2016. Specification and use of geopolymer concrete in the manufacture of structural and non-structural components: review of literature.
Tao, M., and Mallick, R. B. 2020. Best Practice for Assessing Roadway Damages Caused by Flooding. Louisiana Transportation Research Center.
Turner, L. K., and Collins, F. G. 2013. Carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2-e) emissions: A comparison between geopolymer and OPC cement concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 43: 125–130. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.01.023.
Wang, M. Q. 1999. GREET 1.5 - transportation fuel-cycle model - Vol. 1 : methodology, development, use, and results. In Argonne National Laboratory. Argonne, Illinois.
Zhang, K., Douglas, B. C., and Leatherman, S. P. 2004. Global warming and coastal erosion. Climatic Change, 64(1–2): 41–58. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CLIM.0000024690.32682.48.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Geo-Congress 2024
Geo-Congress 2024
Pages: 515 - 525

History

Published online: Feb 22, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Jungyeon Jang, Ph.D., A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Nripojyoti Biswas, Ph.D., A.M.ASCE [email protected]
2Zachry Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX. Email: [email protected]
Anand J. Puppala, Ph.D., D.GE, P.E., F.ASCE [email protected]
3Zachry Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX. Email: [email protected]
Surya Sarat Chandra Congress, Ph.D., A.M.ASCE [email protected]
4Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Michigan State Univ., East Lansing, MI. Email: [email protected]
Miladin Radovic, Ph.D. [email protected]
5Dept. of Materials Science and Engineering, Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX. Email: [email protected]
Oscar Huang [email protected]
6Dept. of Materials Science and Engineering, Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$158.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$158.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share