Importance of Product-Specific Testing in Determining Durability Reduction Factor for Polyester Geogrids in High pH Conditions
Publication: Geo-Congress 2024
ABSTRACT
As alternative backfills become more commonplace in the construction of mechanically stabilized earth (MSE) walls, the selection of reduction factors in calculating the long-term design strength (LTDS) should be evaluated. Alternative backfill materials have the potential to approach the FHWA default reduction factors for durability. The FHWA default reduction factors for durability are based on the minimum molecular weight (Mw) and maximum carboxyl end group (CEG) concentration of the high tenacity polyester fibers used in geogrid production in conjunction with limiting the pH range of the soil backfill for polyester (PET) geogrids. However, these default reduction factors are conservative, and the default pH range is based on limited testing of a particular coated PET geogrid in environments with a pH over 9. This paper outlines the importance of product-specific testing in elevated pH backfill environments. A detailed multi-year investigation of the reduction in tensile strength of two different manufacturers’ coated PET geogrid exposed to pH values ranging between 10 and 11.4 was performed. The comparison between the two different coated PET geogrids shows the reduction in tensile strength due to submersion in elevated pH aqueous solutions can vary, even with similar Mw and CEG products. This paper illustrates the importance of product-specific testing and the conservatism built into the FHWA default durability reduction factors.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.
REFERENCES
AASHTO. (2020). Standard Practice for Determination of Long-Term Design Strength for Geosynthetic Reinforcement, AASHTO R 69-20. AASHTO, Washington D.C.
ASTM. ASTM D6637/D6637M-15. Standard Test Method for Determining Tensile Properties of Geogrids by the Single of Multi-Rib Tensile Method, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2015.
Burgoyne, C. J., and Merii, A. L. (2007). “On the hydrolytic stability of polyester yarns.” Journal of Material Science, 42, 2867–2878.
Elias, V., Salman, A., and Goulias, D. (1998). “The Effect of pH, Resin Properties, and Manufacturing Process on Laboratory Degradation of Polyester Geosynthetics.” Geosynthetics International, 5(5), 459–490.
FHWA (US DOT Federal Highway Administration). (2009a). Corrosion/Degradation of Soil Reinforcements for Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls and Reinforced Soil Slopes,. NHI, Washington, D.C.
FHWA (US DOT Federal Highway Administration). (2009b). Design and Construction of Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls and Reinforced Soil Slopes – Volume I,. NHI, Washington, D.C.
Greenwood, J. H., and Schroeder, H. F. (2012). “Hydrolysis: polyesters, polyamides, aramids.”, Stichting CURNET, The Netherlands.
Hsuan, Y. G., and Koerner, R. M. (2005). “Evaluation of the Behavior of Polyethylene Terephthalate Yarns” Proceedings Geo-Frontiers Congress 2005, ASCE, Reston, VA.
Hsuan, Y. G., Schroeder, H. F., Rowe, K., Muller, W., Greenwood, J., Cazzuffi, D., and Koerner, R. M. (2008). “Long-term Performance and Lifetime Prediction of Geosynthetics”.
ISO. (2020). Geosynthetics – Guidelines for the assessment of durability. (ISO/TS 13434).
ISO. (2007). Guidelines for the determination of the long-term strength of geosynthetics for soil reinforcement. (ISO/TR 20432).
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
History
Published online: Feb 22, 2024
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.