Chapter
Feb 22, 2024

Integration of Physical and Statistical Knowledge in Landslide Susceptibility Characterization

Publication: Geo-Congress 2024

ABSTRACT

Landslide susceptibility mapping (LSM) can provide valuable information for landslide characterization and mitigation. However, there are long-standing problems with LSM that have remained unaddressed or inadequately resolved, such as a lack of an effective framework to integrate the physical and statistical knowledge about landslide occurrence. To address the knowledge gap, this paper proposed to combine the physical model and machine learning techniques to produce a robust landslide hazard assessment. The hypothesis is that the physical modeling result itself can be a valuable model input to be incorporated in the training model of a machine learning framework. In this research, the tree augmented naïve (TAN) Bayes classifier has been selected as the machine learning model. In addition, we used PISA-m, a probabilistic landslide slope stability program, to estimate the probability of landslide occurrence in Magoffin County, Kentucky, United States. Results of physically assessed landslide susceptibility were used to be combined with other geomorphological variables in the TAN model to predict the landslide probability in the study area. We performed cross-validation to evaluate the model performance and reliability of the proposed methodology.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.

REFERENCES

Alvioli, M., and Baum, R. L. (2016). Parallelization of the TRIGRS model for rainfall-induced landslides using the message passing interface. Environmental Modelling & Software, Volume 81, 122–135. https://doi.org/10.5066/F73J3B27.
Anagnostopoulos, G. G., Fatichi, S., and Burlando, P. (2015). An advanced process-based distributed model for the investigation of rainfall-induced landslides: The effect of process representation and boundary conditions. Water Resources Research, 51(9), 7501–7523. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR016909.
Baum, R. L., Savage, W. Z., and Godt, J. W. (2008). TRIGRS: a Fortran program for transient rainfall infiltration and grid-based regional slope-stability analysis, version 2.0.
Cooper, G. F., & Herskovits, E. (1992). A Bayesian method for the induction of probabilistic networks from data. Machine Learning, 9(4), 309–347. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00994110
Crawford, M. M., & Bryson, L. S. (2017). Assessment of active landslides using field electrical measurements. Engineering Geology, 233, 146–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENGGEO.2017.11.012.
Crawford, M. M., Dortch, J. M., Koch, H. J., Killen, A. A., Zhu, J., Zhu, Y., Bryson, L. S., & Haneberg, W. C. (2021). Using landslide-inventory mapping for a combined bagged-trees and logistic-regression approach to determining landslide susceptibility in eastern Kentucky, USA. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology, 54(4). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1144/qjegh2020-177.
Friedman, N., Geiger, D., and Goldszmidt, M. (1997). Bayesian Network Classifiers. Machine Learning, 29(2–3), 131–163. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007465528199/METRICS.
Guzzetti, F., Reichenbach, P., Cardinali, M., Galli, M., and Ardizzone, F. (2005). Probabilistic landslide hazard assessment at the basin scale. Geomorphology, 72(1–4), 272–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GEOMORPH.2005.06.002.
Haneberg, W. C. (2000). Deterministic and probabilistic approaches to geologic hazard assessment. Environmental & Engineering Geoscience, 6(3), 209–226. https://doi.org/10.2113/GSEEGEOSCI.6.3.209.
Haneberg, W. C. (2004). A Rational Probabilistic Method for Spatially Distributed Landslide Hazard Assessment. Environmental & Engineering Geoscience, 10(1), 27–43. https://doi.org/10.2113/10.1.27.
Jones, E., Slaughter, S., and Mirus, B. (2022). Landslide Inventories across the United States version 2. https://www.usgs.gov/maps/national-landslides-map-and-data.
Koller, D., and Friedman, N. (2009). Probabilistic Graphical Models: Principles and Techniques. MIT press.
Montgomery, D. R., and Dietrich, W. E. (1994). A physically based model for the topographic control on shallow landsliding. Water Resources Research, 30(4), 1153–1171. https://doi.org/10.1029/93WR02979.
Pei, T., and Qiu, T (2023). Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Using Machine Learning Methods: A Case Study in Colorado Front Range, USA. Geo-Congress 2023, 521–530. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784484654.052.
Tien Bui, D., Tuan, T. A., Klempe, H., Pradhan, B., and Revhaug, I. (2016). Spatial prediction models for shallow landslide hazards: a comparative assessment of the efficacy of support vector machines, artificial neural networks, kernel logistic regression, and logistic model tree. Landslides, 13(2), 361–378. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10346-015-0557-6/FIGURES/7.
Varela González, P., and Medina-Cetina, Z. (2017). Risk Assessment for Landslides Using Bayesian Networks and Remote Sensing Data. Geo-Risk 2017, 113–123. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784480724.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Geo-Congress 2024
Geo-Congress 2024
Pages: 590 - 600

History

Published online: Feb 22, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Sahand Khabiri [email protected]
1Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Temple Univ., Philadelphia, PA. Email: [email protected]
Yichuan Zhu, Ph.D., M.ASCE [email protected]
2Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Temple Univ., Philadelphia, PA. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$152.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$152.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share