Chapter
Feb 22, 2024

Sinkhole Evaluation Using Full Waveform Tomography: A Comparative Numerical Study of Objective Functions

Publication: Geo-Congress 2024

ABSTRACT

Full waveform tomography offers an effective method by which to evaluate near-surface conditions and reconstruct a subsurface model in the presence of strong heterogeneities. Because full waveform inversion (FWI) of seismic waves directly inverts both the phase and amplitude information of all recorded waveforms in a dataset, the resolution capabilities are improved relative to other seismic methods that rely on first-arrival times or dispersion-based analyses. FWI proceeds by generating a forward model that numerically simulates wave propagation within the domain. A single-objective inverse problem is subsequently formulated and solved using deterministic optimization algorithms to minimize the misfit between the observed field and simulated model waveforms. However, FWI is highly sensitive to the initial model. Poor misfit between the initial model and the true subsurface conditions can lead to inaccurate results from the inversion converging to local minima or failing to converge at all. One approach to mitigate this ill-posedness is to carefully select an appropriate objective function to characterize the misfit between field and synthetic waveforms. The misfit function often represents a tradeoff between inversion ill-posedness and resolution of the reconstructed subsurface model. The most common FWI objective function characterizes the misfit using a least-squares approach (i.e., L2 norm). However, the L2 norm misfit function tends to trap in local minima and may fail to converge for models with strong heterogeneous subsurface features, particularly when a poor initial model is selected. In this study, the recently proposed optimal transport misfit function was explored when applied to a near-surface domain. This misfit function relies on optimal transport theory, which develops a more effective measure of distance between probability distributions and exhibits reduced non-convexity relative to the least-squares misfit function. Both misfit functions were applied to invert waveform data acquired from a model with a subsurface sinkhole feature. Performance of the two misfit functions was evaluated by comparing their subsequent inversion results obtained from different starting models. The optimal transport misfit function was found to be more robust than the least-squares misfit and exhibited fewer convergence issues when a poor initial model was used for the FWI.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.

REFERENCES

Afanasiev, M., Boehm, C., Van Driel, M., Krischer, L., Rietmann, M., May, D. A., Knepley, M. G., and Fichtner, A. 2019. Modular and flexible spectral-element waveform modelling in two and three dimensions. Geophysical Journal International, 216 (3), 1675–1692.
Ali, H., and Choi, J. 2019. A review of underground pipeline leakage and sinkhole monitoring methods based on wireless sensor networking. Sustainability, 11 (15), 4007.
Alidoust, P., Coe, J., Yang, Y., Kordjazi, A., and Mahvelati, S. 2023a. Numerical Investigation of Full Waveform Tomography to Identify Anomalous Conditions and Untreated Zones in Jet Grout Columns. In: Geo-Congress. Springer, 214–222.
Alidoust, P., Mahvelati, S., Coe, J., Mutu, A., Mcinnes, S., Painter, M., and Kubiak, C. 2023b. HVSR Measurements to Investigate Sinkholes and Treatment Efforts along a Roadway. In: Geo-Congress. 94–103.
Belahi, T., Singh, S. C., and Fuji, N. 2016. Viscoelastic full waveform inversion of sea bottom long offset seismic data in presence of attenuation. In: 78th EAGE Conference, 1–5.
Bunks, C., Saleck, F. M., Zaleski, S., and Chavent, G. 1995. Multiscale seismic waveform inversion. Geophysics, 60 (5), 1457–1473.
Clayton, R., and Engquist, B. 1977. Absorbing Boundary Conditions for Acoustic and Elastic Wave Equations. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 67 (6), 1529–1540.
Engquist, B., and Froese, B. D. 2013. Application of the Wasserstein metric to seismic signals. Communications in Mathematical Sciences, 12 (5), 979–988.
Guerrero, J., Gutiérrez, F., Bonachea, J., and Lucha, P. 2008. A sinkhole susceptibility zonation based on paleokarst analysis along a stretch of the Madrid–Barcelona high-speed railway built over gypsum-and salt. Engineering Geology, 102 (1), 62–73.
Mahvelati, S., and Coe, J. T. 2019. Comparison of Dispersion-Based Analysis of Surface Waves and Full Waveform Inversion in Characterizing Unknown Foundations. Geo-Congress 2019: Engineering Geology, Site Characterization, and Geophysics, 158–166.
Malinowski, M., Operto, S., and Ribodetti, A. 2011. High-resolution seismic attenuation imaging from wide-aperture onshore data by visco-acoustic frequency-domain full-waveform inversion. Geophysical Journal, 186 (3), 1179–1204.
Métivier, L., Brossier, R., and Mérigot, Q. 2016. Measuring the misfit between seismograms using an optimal transport distance: Application to full waveform inversion. Geophysical Supplements to the Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 205 (1), 345–377.
Mirzanejad, M., and Tran, K. T. 2019. 3D viscoelastic full waveform inversion of seismic waves for geotechnical site investigation. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 122, 67–78.
Nguyen, T., Tran, T., and McVay, M. 2016. Evaluation of unknown foundations using surface-based full waveform tomography. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 21 (5), 04016013.
Nocedal, J., and Wright, S. 1999. Numerical optimization. New York: Springer New York.
Nouioua, I., Rouabhia, A., Fehdi, C., Boukelloul, M., Gadri, L., Chabou, D., and Mouici, R. 2013. The application of GPR and electrical resistivity tomography as useful tools in detection of sinkholes in the Cheria Basin (northeast of Algeria). Environmental earth sciences, 68, 1661–1672.
Pladys, A., Brossier, R. B., and Métivier, L. 2017. FWI alternative misfit functions - What properties should they satisfy? 79th EAGE Conference.
Poncet, R., Messud, J., Bader, M., Lambaré, G., Viguier, G., and Hidalgo, C. 2018. FWI with optimal transport: A 3D implementation and an application on a field dataset. 80th EAGE Conference, 1–5.
Prieux, V., Brossier, R., Operto, S., and Virieux, J. 2013. Multiparameter full waveform inversion of multicomponent ocean-bottom-cable data from the Valhall field. Part 1: Imaging compressional wave speed, density and. Geophysical Journal, 194 (3), 1640–1664.
Sirgue, L., and Pratt, R. G. 2004. Efficient waveform inversion and imaging: A strategy for selecting temporal frequencies. Geophysics, 69 (1), 231–248.
Villani, C. 2021. Topics in optimal transportation. American Mathematical Soc.
Virieux, J., and Operto, S. 2009. An overview of full-waveform inversion in exploration geophysics. Geophysics, 74 (6).
Wathelet, M., Chatelain, J., and Cornou, C. 2020. Geopsy: A user‐friendly open‐source tool set for ambient vibration processing. Seismological Research Letters, 91 (3), 1878–1889.
Yong, P., Liao, W., Huang, J., Li, Z., and Lin, Y. 2019. Misfit function for full waveform inversion based on the Wasserstein metric with dynamic formulation. Journal of Computational Physics, 399, 108911.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Geo-Congress 2024
Geo-Congress 2024
Pages: 567 - 576

History

Published online: Feb 22, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Pourya Alidoust [email protected]
1Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Temple Univ., Philadelphia, PA. Email: [email protected]
2Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Temple Univ., Philadelphia, PA. Email: [email protected]
3HNTB Corp., Parsippany, NJ. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$128.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$128.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share