Coastal Wetland Surface Elevation Post-Construction: Application of Observational Method to Calibrate Consolidation Models
Publication: Geo-Congress 2024
ABSTRACT
The US Army Corps of Engineers seeks to beneficially use 70% of sediment dredged by 2030, which equates to approximately 30 million cubic yards annually. One option to achieve this is the beneficial use of dredged material (BUDM) to supplement marsh elevation, bolstering the long-term stability of the natural infrastructure. In the BUDM design process, target elevation throughout the design life must be determined, which requires a holistic understanding of external factors such as tidal ranges, local hydrology, subsidence, accretion, and projected sea-level rise rates. However, determining a target elevation is only half the problem as one must also determine the magnitude and rate of consolidation. Hydraulically dredged sediment is deposited in a fluid state and will undergo large deformations. Engineering uncertainty is highly prevalent in coastal projects due to the difficulty in quantifying the engineering properties of soft deltaic soils. In 2020, the USACE Philadelphia District (NAP) began a multi-phase BUDM project to use sediment from a waterway maintenance event to supplement a back-bay island. The observational method was utilized to calibrate consolidation models against data collected during the first two placements to better predict elevations following a future placement. The comparison against elevation data showed that base models underpredicted the magnitude of consolidation which would have compounded to a 17% difference between the base and calibrated models following the third placement.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.
REFERENCES
Cadigan, J. A., B. D. Harris, and N. H. Jafari. jcadig1/LSU_CPT_Processing: LSU_CPT_Processing-v1.0 (Version v1.0). Zenodo. 2020, March 31. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3734396.
Cadigan, J. A., N. H. Jafari, C. L. Stagg, C. Laurenzano, B. D. Harris, A. E. Meselhe, J. Dugas, and B. Couvillion. (2022). “Characterization of vegetated and ponded wetlands with implications towards coastal wetland marsh collapse.” Catena, 218, 106547.
Cadigan, J., N. Jafari, N. Wang, Q. Chen, L. Zhu, B. Harris, and Y. Ding. (2023). Near- Continuous Monitoring of a Coastal Salt Marsh Margin: Implications to Predicting Marsh Edge Erosion. Journal of Geophysical Research – Earth Surface.
Cargill, K. W. (1982). Consolidation of soft layers by finite strain analysis. Vicksburg, MS: US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station.
Croft, A. L., L. A. Leonard, T. Alphin, L. B. Cahoon, and M. Posey. (2006). The effects of thin layer sand renourishment on tidal marsh processes: Masonboro Island, North Carolina. Estuaries and Coasts 29:737–750.
Davis, R. A. (1997). “Regional Coastal Morphodynamics along the United States Gulf of Mexico.” Journal of Coastal Research 13(3): 595–604.
Day, J., L. Britsch, S. Hawes, G. Shaffer, D. Reed, and D. Cahoon. (2000). “Pattern and Process of Land Loss in the Mississippi Delta: A Spatial and Temporal Analysis of Wetland Habitat Change.” Estuaries 23: 425–438.
Day, J. W., G. P. Kemp, D. J. Reed, D. R. Cahoon, R. M. Boumans, J. M. Suhayda, and R. Gambrell. (2011). Vegetation death and rapid loss of surface elevation in two contrasting Mississippi delta salt marshes: The role of sedimentation, autocompaction and sea-level rise.” Ecological Engineering 37(2): 229–240.
Fattet, M., Y. Fu, M. Ghestem, W. Ma, M. Foulonneau, J. Nespoulous, Y. Le Bissonnais, and A. Stokes. (2011). “Effects of vegetation type on soil resistance to erosion: Relationship between aggregate stability and shear strength.” CATENA 87(1): 60–69.
Harris, B. D., C. Johnson, N. H. Jafari, Q. Chen, and C. E. Ozdemir. (2020a). “Effects of coupled consolidation and overwash processes on a low-lying headland system.” Coastal Engineering 160: 103746.
Harris, B., J. Cadigan, D. Day, and N. Jafari. (2020b). Geotechnical Characterization of an Eroding Wetland. Geo-Congress.
Harris, B., D. Day, N. Jafari, J. Cadigan, S. Bailey, and Z. Tyler. (2021). “Establishment of Soil Strength in a Nourished Wetland Using Thin Layer Placement of Dredged Material.” PLoS One.
Harris, B., L. Lamb-Wotton, O. Alawneh, N. Jafari, T. Troxler, D. Day, J. Cadigan, F. Sklar, and C. Coronado-Molina. (2023). Comparison of Coastal Marsh Below-Ground Root Biomass and Shear Strength in Louisiana and Everglades National Park. Coastal Sediments 2023.
Holling, C. S. (1978). Adaptive Environmental Assessment and Management. Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons.
Jafari, N. H., B. D. Harris, and T. D. Stark. (2018). “Geotechnical investigations at the caminada headlands beach and dune in coastal Louisiana.” Coastal Engineering 142: 82–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2018.04.014.
Jafari, N. H., et al. (2019a). “Wetland shear strength with emphasis on the impact of nutrients, sediments, and sea level rise.” Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 229: 106394.
Jafari, N. H., B. D. Harris, J. A. Cadigan, and Q. Chen. (2019b). “Piezocone penetrometer measurements in coastal Louisiana wetlands.” Ecological Engineering 127: 338–347.
Mesri, G., and M. Ajlouni. (2007). Engineering properties of fibrous peats. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 133 (7), 850–866.
Morris, J. T., K. Sundberg, and C. S. Hopkinson. (2013). “Salt Marsh Primary Production and Its Responses to Relative Sea Level and Nutrients in Estuaries at Plum Island, Massachusetts, and North Inlet, South Carolina, USA.” Oceanography 26(3): 78–84.
Peck, R. B. (1969). “Advantages and Limitations of the Observational Method in Applied Soil Mechanics.” Géotechnique 19(2): 171–187.
Peck, R. B. (2001). “The observational method can be simple.” Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Geotechnical Engineering 149(2): 71–74.
Powderham, A. “The Observational Method – Learning from Projects” (2004). International Conference on Case Histories in Geotechnical Engineering. 8.
Spross, J., and F. Johansson. (2017). “When is the observational method in geotechnical engineering favourable?” Structural Safety 66: 17–26.
Stark, T. D., H. Choi, and P. R. Schroeder. (2005). “Settlement of dredged and contaminated material placement areas. I: Theory and use of primary consolidation, secondary compression, and desiccation of dredged fill.” J. Waterway, Port, Coastal, Ocean Eng. 131 (2): 43–51. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-950X(2005)131:2(43).
Tedesco, L., L. Ferguson, M. Chasten, S. Collins, and C. Davis. (2019). Sturgeon Island Conceptual Placement Plan. The Wetlands Institute.
Terzaghi, K., R. B. Peck, and G. Mesri. (1996). Soil Mechanics in Engineering Practice. J. Wiley & Sons; Chapman & Hall, New York; London.
Thackston, E. L., M. R. Palermo, and P. R. Schroeder. (1988). Refinement and simplification of column settling tests for design of dredged material containment areas. Vicksburg, MS: US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station.
Weinstein, M., J. Balletto, J. Teal, and D. Ludwig. (1997). “Success criteria and adaptive management for a large-scale wetland restoration project.” Wetlands Ecology and Management 4: 111–127.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Geo-Congress 2024
Pages: 467 - 476
History
Published online: Feb 22, 2024
ASCE Technical Topics:
- Calibration
- Coastal engineering
- Coasts, oceans, ports, and waterways engineering
- Construction engineering
- Construction management
- Dredged materials
- Dredging
- Engineering fundamentals
- Geomechanics
- Geotechnical engineering
- Measurement (by type)
- Project management
- River engineering
- Sediment
- Shores
- Soil mechanics
- Soil properties
- Water and water resources
- Wetlands (coastal)
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.