Random-Field Characterization of Fissuring in Clay
Publication: Geo-Congress 2024
ABSTRACT
Secondary geologic features, such as fissures, greatly influence soil physical properties and mechanical behavior. Because laboratory element-scale experiments often fail to capture these features due to the small specimen size, in situ tests such as the cone penetration test (CPT) often are used to characterize potentially fissured soil under in situ conditions. However, current CPT-based soil characterization charts lack information on the secondary fabric of soil. To address this, this study applies the zero-mean weakly stationary random-field model to assess inherent soil variability with respect to CPT parameters, including corrected cone resistance (qt), sleeve friction (fs), and penetration-induced pore pressure (u2). Results show that intact clays exhibit a scale of fluctuation (δ) value (an indicator of the range of correlated domains) about three times larger than fissured clays for all three CPT parameters, with a value of 0.45 m separating the two categories. The study concludes that qt is the optimal parameter for evaluating fissures, and the procedures outlined can be used to differentiate fissured and intact clays at other sites.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.
REFERENCES
Bong, T., and Stuedlein, A. W. (2018). “Effect of cone penetration conditioning on random field model parameters and impact of spatial variability on liquefaction-induced differential settlements.” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 144(5), 04018018.
Duncan, J. M., and Dunlop, P. (1969). “Slopes in stiff-fissured clays and shales.” Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, 95(2), 467–492.
Harr, M. E. (1987). Reliability-Based Design in Civil Engineering. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
Jaksa, M. B. (1995). The Influence of Spatial Variability on the Geotechnical Design Properties of a Stiff, Overconsolidated Clay. Doctoral dissertation, The University of Adelaide.
Jaksa, M. B., Kaggwa, W. S., and Brooker, P. I. (1999). “Experimental evaluation of the scale of fluctuation of a stiff clay.” Proc., 8th Int. Conf. on Application of Statistics and Probability, A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, Netherlands, 415–422.
Khosravi, A., Martinez, A., and DeJong, J. T. (2020). “Discrete element model (DEM) simulations of cone penetration test (CPT) measurements and soil classification.” Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 57(9), 1369–1387.
Leroueil, S. (1992). “A framework for the mechanical behaviour of structured soils, from soft clays to weak rocks”. Proc., US–Brasil NSF Geotechnical Workshop on Applicability of Classical Coil Mechanics Principles to Structured Soils, Printec Press, Belo Horizonte, Brazil, 107–128.
Marsland, A. (1974). “Comparisons of the results from static penetration tests and large in-situ plate tests in London clay.” Proc., European Symp. on Penetration Testing, ESOPT, Stockholm, Sweden, 245–252.
Mayne, P. W. (2017). “Stress history of soils from cone penetration tests.” Soils Rocks, 40, 203–218.
Oluwatuyi, O. E., Holt, R., Rajapakshage, R., Wulff, S. S., and Ng, K. (2022). “Inherent variability assessment from sparse property data of overburden soils and intermediate geomaterials using random field approaches.” Georisk: Assessment and Management of Risk for Engineered Systems and Geohazards, 16(4), 766–781.
Oluwatuyi, O. E., Ng, K. W., Wulff, S. S., and Rajapakshage, R. (2023). “Optimal site investigation through combined geological and property uncertainties analysis.” Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 41(4), 2377–2393.
Phoon, K. K., Quek, S. T., and An, P. (2003). “Identification of statistically homogeneous soil layers using modified Bartlett statistics.” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 129(7), 649–659.
Phoon, K. K., Ching, J., and Shuku, T. (2022). “Challenges in data-driven site characterization.” Georisk: Assessment and Management of Risk for Engineered Systems and Geohazards, 16(1), 114–126.
Robertson, P. K., Richard, G. C., Donald, G., and James, G. (1986). “Use of piezometer cone data.” Use of In Situ Tests in Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, 1263–1280.
Robertson, P. K. (1990). “Soil classification using the cone penetration test.” Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 27(1), 151–158.
Robertson, P. K. (2016). “Cone penetration test (CPT)-based soil behaviour type (SBT) classification system—an update.” Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 53(12), 1910–1927.
Terzaghi, K., Peck, R. B., and Mesri, G. (1996). Soil Mechanics in Engineering Practice. Third edition. John wiley & sons, New York, NY.
Uzielli, M., Vannucchi, G., and Phoon, K. K. (2005). “Random field characterisation of stress-nomalised cone penetration testing parameters.” Geotechnique, 55(1), 3–20.
Vessia, G., and Russo, S. (2018). “Random field theory to interpret the spatial variability of lacustrine soils.” Biosystems Engineering, 168, 4–13.
Wickremesinghe, D. S. (1989). Statistical Characterization of Soil Profiles Using In Situ Tests. Doctoral dissertation, University of British Columbia.
Wilcoxon, F. (1992). Individual comparisons by ranking methods. Springer, New York, NY.
Reza, S. K., Kumar, N., Ramachandran, S., Mukhopadhyay, S., Singh, S. K., Dwivedi, B. S., and Ray, S. K. (2021). “Geo-spatial analysis for horizontal and vertical variability of bulk density, particle-size distribution and soil moisture content in Tripura, Northeastern India.” Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 14(24), 2734.
Saye, S. R., Santos, J., Olson, S. M., and Leigh, R. D. (2017). “Linear trendlines to assess soil classification from cone penetration test data”. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001729.
Schneider, J. A., Randolph, M. F., Mayne, P. W., and Ramsey, N. R. (2008). “Analysis of factors influencing soil classification using normalized piezocone tip resistance and pore pressure parameters.” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 134(11), 1569–1586.
Yoshida, I., and Shuku, T. (2021). “Soil stratification and spatial variability estimated using sparse modeling and Gaussian random field theory.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering, ASCE-ASME, 7(3), 04021023.
Zhu, H., and Zhang, L. M. (2013). “Characterizing geotechnical anisotropic spatial variations using random field theory.” Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 50(7), 723–734.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Geo-Congress 2024
Pages: 44 - 53
History
Published online: Feb 22, 2024
ASCE Technical Topics:
- Clays
- Continuum mechanics
- Cracking
- Engineering fundamentals
- Engineering mechanics
- Field tests
- Fracture mechanics
- Geology
- Geomechanics
- Geotechnical engineering
- Geotechnical investigation
- Material mechanics
- Material properties
- Materials engineering
- Mathematics
- Mechanical properties
- Parameters (statistics)
- Penetration tests
- Soil mechanics
- Soil properties
- Soils (by type)
- Solid mechanics
- Statistics
- Tests (by type)
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.