Chapter
Mar 18, 2024

A Small-Scale Simulation Approach to Educate the Next Generation of Engineers about Sustainability Challenges in Building Demolition

Publication: Construction Research Congress 2024

ABSTRACT

About 90% of demolition waste is recyclable and reusable based on its inert nature; however, recycling and reuse of those materials are limited. One major barrier is the lack of demolition engineers’ knowledge about sustainable demolition practices. Material separation for recovery at demolition sites is much easier and more effective but more time-consuming than separation for recovery at material recovery facilities. As such, careful demolition planning by construction/demolition engineers is critical; however, most of the US construction engineering curricula do not cover demolition operations, thus lacking learning opportunities about sustainable demolition practices. In an effort to develop the next generation of demolition engineers with the sustainability mindset, we designed small-scale demolition simulation activities using 1:14 scale demolition vehicles where students will be exposed to sustainability challenges (e.g., on-site separation vs. off-site separation) and learned their critical role as construction/demolition engineers. To mimic real-world demolition sites, different structural waste was used, and students would be tasked with operating excavators and trucks in separating and moving different types of materials for recovery within set time constraints. Through the hands-on experience, students could find potential challenges with sustainable operations and develop critical thinking skills to devise solutions and strategies to tackle them.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.

REFERENCES

Adams, K. T., M. Osmani, T. Thorpe, and J. Thornback. 2017. “Circular economy in construction: current awareness, challenges and enablers.” Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Waste and Resource Management, 170 (1): 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1680/jwarm.16.00011.
Anumba, C., A. Abdullah, and T. Fesseha. 2003. “Selection of demolition techniques: a case study of the Warren Farm Bridge.” Structural Survey, 21 (1): 36–48. https://doi.org/10.1108/02630800310470853.
Asante, R., D. Faibil, M. Agyemang, and S. A. Khan. 2022. “Life cycle stage practices and strategies for circular economy: assessment in construction and demolition industry of an emerging economy.” Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29 (54): 82110–82121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21470-w.
Azhar, S., J. Kim, and A. Salman. 2018. Implementing Virtual Reality And Mixed Reality Technologies In Construction Education: Students’ Perceptions And Lessons Learned. 3720–3730.
Bråten, I., and L. E. Ferguson. 2015. “Beliefs about sources of knowledge predict motivation for learning in teacher education.” Teach Teach Educ, 50: 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.04.003.
Chen, J., M. Wang, and S. Fan. 2013. “Experimental investigation of small-scaled model for powerhouse dam section on shaking table.” Struct Control Health Monit, 20 (5): 740–752. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.1489.
Collins, W., and L. Redden. 2021. “Improving Student’s Estimating Abilities through Experiential Learning.” Int J Constr Educ Res, 17 (2): 117–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/15578771.2020.1739178.
Effendy, K., T. Octavia, and G. B. Wijaya. 2020. “Usage of Miniature Houses Built using Construction Materials in Engineering Educational Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Programs.” International Journal of Industrial Research and Applied Engineering, 5 (2). https://doi.org/10.9744/jirae.5.2.41-48.
Kolb, D. A. 2014. Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. FT press.
Liu, A., G. Hodgson, and W. Lord. 2010. “Innovation in Construction Education: The Role of Culture in E-learning.” Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 6 (2): 91–102. https://doi.org/10.3763/aedm.2009.0109.
Luciano, A., L. Cutaia, F. Cioffi, and C. Sinibaldi. 2021. “Demolition and construction recycling unified management: the DECORUM platform for improvement of resource efficiency in the construction sector.” Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28 (19): 24558–24569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09513-6.
Kumaraswamy, M. M., F. Y. Y. Ling, and C. J. Miller. 2007. “Innovative initiatives in construction education and training.” Emirates Journal for Engineering Research, 12 (1): 43–56.
Ngan, S. L., B. S. How, S. Y. Teng, M. A. B. Promentilla, P. Yatim, A. C. Er, and H. L. Lam. 2019. “Prioritization of sustainability indicators for promoting the circular economy: The case of developing countries.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 111: 314–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.05.001.
Pittau, F., D. Giacomel, G. Iannaccone, and L. Malighetti. 2020. “Environmental Consequences Of Refurbishment Versus Demolition And Reconstruction: A Comparative Life Cycle Assessment Of An Italian Case Study.” Journal of Green Building, 15 (4): 155–172. https://doi.org/10.3992/jgb.15.4.155.
Reyes, E., and J. C. Gálvez. 2011. “Introduction of Innovations into the Traditional Teaching of Construction and Building Materials.” Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 137 (1): 28–37. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000033.
del Río Merino, M., P. Izquierdo Gracia, and I. S. Weis Azevedo. 2010. “Sustainable construction: construction and demolition waste reconsidered.” Waste Management & Research: The Journal for a Sustainable Circular Economy, 28 (2): 118–129. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X09103841.
Satterthwait, D. 2010. “Why are’hands-on’science activities so effective for student learning?” Teaching Science, 56 (2): 7–10.
Setareh, M. 2001. “Development of Teaching Tool for Building Construction.” Journal of Architectural Engineering, 7 (1): 6–12. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0431(2001)7:1(6).
Shafii, F., Z. A. Ali, and M. Z. Othman. 2006. “Achieving sustainable construction in the developing countries of Southeast Asia.” Proceedings of the 6th Asia-Pacific Structural Engineering and Construction Conference (APSEC 2006), 5–6. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Whisker, V., S. Yerrapathruni, J. Messner, and A. Baratta. 2003. “Using Virtual Reality To Improve Construction Engineering Education.” Paper presented at 2003 Annual Conference, 8.1266.1–8.1266.9. Nashville, Tennessee: ASEE Conferences.
Wu, S. P. W., and M. A. Rau. 2018. “Effectiveness and efficiency of adding drawing prompts to an interactive educational technology when learning with visual representations.” Learn Instr, 55: 93–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.09.010.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Construction Research Congress 2024
Construction Research Congress 2024
Pages: 366 - 375

History

Published online: Mar 18, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Moustafa Elsayed [email protected]
1Ph.D. Student, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, FAMU-FSU College of Engineering, Tallahassee, FL. Email: [email protected]
Juyeong Choi [email protected]
2Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, FAMU-FSU College of Engineering, Tallahassee, FL. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$190.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$190.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share