Understanding the Technology Adoption Challenges in the Construction Industry through Experiential Learning Models
Publication: Construction Research Congress 2024
ABSTRACT
Innovation and technologies play a vital role in meeting the evolving demands of the construction industry. However, the construction industry still needs to increase technology adoption. One of the main barriers that have been discussed is the industry’s readiness to adopt new technologies. To prepare the next generation of professionals, construction education needs to lead the trend by understanding current construction industry challenges and teaching how to develop technological development solutions to improve the constructability of projects. This study applies Kolb’s experiential learning model to engage construction management students in hands-on experience and reflections related to technology adoption theories with industry professionals. In addition, this study aims to engage students to gain insight into their skills, interests, and values in technology adoption. The results contribute to identifying the areas that need realignments to the construction management curriculum and provide a pedagogical framework for construction technology adoption for academia and practice.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.
REFERENCES
Becerik-Gerber, B., D. J. Gerber, and K. Ku. 2011. “The Pace of Technological Innovation in Architecture, Engineering, and Construction Education: Integrating Recent Trends Into the Curricula.”
Chen, X., A. Y. Chang-Richards, A. Pelosi, Y. Jia, X. Shen, M. K. Siddiqui, and N. Yang. 2021. “Implementation of technologies in the construction industry: a systematic review.” Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 29 (8): 3181–3209. Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-02-2021-0172.
Cowden, C. D., and M. F. Santiago. 2016. “Interdisciplinary Explorations: Promoting Critical Thinking via Problem-Based Learning in an Advanced Biochemistry Class.” J. Chem. Educ., 93 (3): 464–469. American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00378.
Fukami, C. V. 2009. “The SAGE Handbook of Management Learning, Education and Development.” The SAGE Handbook of Management Learning, Education and Development, 1–600. SAGE Publications Ltd.
Glick, S., D. Porter, and C. Smith. 2012. “Student Visualization: Using 3-D Models in Undergraduate Construction Management Education.” International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 8 (1): 26–46. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/15578771.2011.619247.
Hajshirmohammadi, A. 2017. “Incorporating Experiential Learning in Engineering Courses.” IEEE Communications Magazine, 55 (11): 166–169. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2017.1700373.
Hanif, S., A. F. C. Wijaya, and N. Winarno. 2019. “Enhancing Students’ Creativity through STEM Project-Based Learning.” Journal of Science Learning, 2 (2): 50–57. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
Kolb, D. A. 2014. Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. FT Press.
Kolb, D. A., R. E. Boyatzis, and C. Mainemelis. 2001. “Experiential Learning Theory: Previous Research and New Directions.” Perspectives on Thinking, Learning, and Cognitive Styles. Routledge.
Li, J., K. Afsari, N. Li, J. Peng, Z. Wu, and H. Cui. 2020. “A review for presenting building information modeling education and research in China.” Journal of Cleaner Production, 259: 120885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120885.
Loosemore, M. 2014. “Improving construction productivity: a subcontractor’s perspective.” Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 21 (3): 245–260. Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-05-2013-0043.
Loosemore, M. 2014. “Innovate or Perish? Exploring some of the Myths of Construction Innovation.” Australasian Journal of Construction Economics and Building - Conference Series, 2 (2): 44–55. https://doi.org/10.5130/ajceb-cs.v2i2.3888.
McCarthy, M. 2010. “Experiential Learning Theory: From Theory To Practice.” JBER, 8 (5). https://doi.org/10.19030/jber.v8i5.725.
Pan, Y., F. K. W. Wong, and E. C. M. Hui. 2011. “Application of Industrialized Housing System in China: A Chongqing Study.” Modeling Risk Management in Sustainable Construction, Computational Risk Management, D. D. Wu, ed., 161–168. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
Park, Y., H. Son, and C. Kim. 2012. “Investigating the determinants of construction professionals’ acceptance of web-based training: An extension of the technology acceptance model.” Automation in Construction, Planning Future Cities-Selected papers from the 2010 eCAADe Conference, 22: 377–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2011.09.016.
Poore, J. A., D. L. Cullen, and G. L. Schaar. 2014. “Simulation-Based Interprofessional Education Guided by Kolb’s Experiential Learning Theory.” Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 10 (5): e241–e247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2014.01.004.
Raffaghelli, J. E., M. E. Rodríguez, A.-E. Guerrero-Roldán, and D. Bañeres. 2022. “Applying the UTAUT model to explain the students’ acceptance of an early warning system in Higher Education.” Computers & Education, 182: 104468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104468.
Reshmad’sa, L., and S. N. Vijayakumari. 2017. “Effect of Kolb’s Experiential Learning Strategy on Enhancing Pedagogical Skills of Pre-Service Teachers of Secondary School Level.” Journal on School Educational Technology, 13 (2): 1–6. i-manager Publications.
Rhodes, T., and A. Finley. 2013. “Using the VALUE Rubrics for Improvement of Learning and Authentic Assessment.” Peer Review, 15 (2): 32–33. Association of American Colleges and Universities.
Rogers, E. M. 2010. Diffusion of Innovations, 4th Edition. Simon and Schuster.
Russell-Bowie, D. 2013. “Mission Impossible or Possible Mission? Changing Confidence and Attitudes of Primary Preservice Music Education Students Using Kolb’s Experiential Learning Theory.” Australian Journal of Music Education. Australian Society for Music Education.
Sepasgozar, S. M. E., and L. E. Bernold. 2013. Factors Influencing the Decision of Technology Adoption in Construction. 654–661. American Society of Civil Engineers. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784412688.078.
Sepasgozar, S. M. E., and S. Davis. 2018. “Construction Technology Adoption Cube: An Investigation on Process, Factors, Barriers, Drivers and Decision Makers Using NVivo and AHP Analysis.” Buildings, 8 (6): 74. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings8060074.
Skibniewski, M. J., and E. K. Zavadskas. 2013. “Technology development in construction: a continuum from distant past into the future.” Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 19 (1): 136–147. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2012.756060.
Tamilmani, K., N. P. Rana, S. F. Wamba, and R. Dwivedi. 2021. “The extended Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT2): A systematic literature review and theory evaluation.” International Journal of Information Management, 57: 102269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102269.
Tibaut, A., D. Rebolj, and M. Nekrep Perc. 2016. “Interoperability requirements for automated manufacturing systems in construction.” J Intell Manuf, 27 (1): 251–262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-013-0862-7.
Venkatesh, V., M. G. Morris, G. B. Davis, and F. D. Davis. 2003. “User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View.” MIS Quarterly, 27 (3): 425–478. Management Information Systems Research Center, University of Minnesota. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540.
Venkatesh, V., J. Y. L. Thong, and X. Xu. 2016. Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology: A Synthesis and the Road Ahead. SSRN Scholarly Paper. Rochester, NY.
Vergara, D., M. P. Rubio, and M. Lorenzo. 2017. “New Approach for the Teaching of Concrete Compression Tests in Large Groups of Engineering Students.” Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 143 (2): 05016009. American Society of Civil Engineers. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000311.
Walker, J. P., and L. M. Rocconi. 2021. “Experiential Learning Student Surveys: Indirect Measures of Student Growth.” Research & Practice in Assessment, 16 (1): 21–35. Virginia Assessment Group.
Wang, L., M. Huang, X. Zhang, R. Jin, and T. Yang. 2020. “Review of BIM Adoption in the Higher Education of AEC Disciplines.” Journal of Civil Engineering Education, 146 (3): 06020001. American Society of Civil Engineers. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.2643-9115.0000018.
Wang, P., P. Wu, J. Wang, H.-L. Chi, and X. Wang. 2018. “A Critical Review of the Use of Virtual Reality in Construction Engineering Education and Training.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15 (6): 1204. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15061204.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Construction Research Congress 2024
Pages: 325 - 334
History
Published online: Mar 18, 2024
ASCE Technical Topics:
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.