Chapter
Mar 18, 2024

Methodology to Measure the Efficiency of Scientific Decision-Making Frameworks to Select Preferred Building Materials

Publication: Construction Research Congress 2024

ABSTRACT

Decision-making in the architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) industry is challenging due to stakeholders with divergent expertise. Oftentimes, the process of decision-making does not follow a systematic approach. Several scientific decision-making methods have been implemented to streamline the decision-making process in the AEC industry. However, previous studies have shown that not all frameworks are well structured, equally efficient, and applicable to all scenarios. This study attempts to develop a methodology to combine and assess the efficiency of the two common multi-criteria decision-making frameworks, Choosing by Advantages (CBA) and fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (FAHP). Furthermore, the study focuses on addressing the early material selection problem in the industry. Both CBA and AHP methods are used to compare concrete, steel, and mass timber building materials in the US from an early decision-making perspective. The findings of the study will have significant contributions to construction practices in terms of making rational and informed decisions regarding building material selection.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.

REFERENCES

Abed, J., S. Rayburg, J. Rodwell, and M. Neave. 2022. “A review of the performance and benefits of mass timber as an alternative to concrete and steel for improving the sustainability of structures.” Sustainability. 14(9), 5570. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095570.
Abraham, K., M. Lepech, and J. Haymaker. 2013. “Selection and application of choosing by advantages on a corporate campus project.” In Proc., 21th Annual Conf. of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC 21), C. T. Formoso and P. Tzortzopoulos, eds., Fortaleza, Brazil, 349–358. http://iglc.net/Papers/Details/861/pdf.
Ahmed, S., and I. Arocho. 2022. “Implementing a choosing-by-advantages decision-making method to evaluate the critical success factors of mass timber building materials in the US.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 148(10), 05022010, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002356.
Ahmed, S., and I. Arocho. 2021. “Analysis of cost comparison and effect of change orders during construction: Study of a mass timber and a concrete building project.” Journal of Building Engineering. 33, 101856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101856.
Ahmed, S., and I. Arocho. 2020. “Mass timber building materials in the US construction industry: Determining the existing awareness level, construction related challenges, and recommendations to increase its current acceptance level.” Cleaner Engineering and Technology. 1, 100007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clet.2020.100007.
Ahmed, S., and I. Arocho. 2019. “Emission of particulate matters (PM) during construction: A comparative study on a cross-laminated timber (CLT) and a steel building project.” Journal of Building Engineering. 22, 281–294, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2018.12.015.
Akadiri, P. O., E. A. Chinyio, and P. O. Olomolaiye. 2012. “Design of a sustainable building: A conceptual framework for implementing sustainability in the building sector.” Buildings. 2(2), 126–152, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings2020126.
Akay, A. O., M. Demir, and M. Akgul. 2018. “Assessment of risk factors in forest road design and construction activities with fuzzy analytic hierarchy process approach in Turkey.” Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 190(561), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-018-6948-0.
Al-Atesh, E. A., Y. Rahmawati, N. A. W. Zawawi, and C. Utomo. 2021.“A decision-making model for supporting selection of green building materials.” International Journal of Construction Management. 23(5), 922–933, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2021.1944548.
Alzahrani, J., and M. W. Emsley. 2013. “The impacts of contractors’ attributes on construction project success: A post construction evaluation.” International Journal of Project Management. 31(2), 313–322, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.06.006.
Arroyo, P., I. D. Tommelein, G. Ballard, and P. Rumsey. 2016. “Choosing by advantages: A case study for selecting a HVAC system for a net zero energy museum”. Energy and Building. 111, 26–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.10.023.
Arroyo, P., I. D. Tommelein, and G. Ballard. 2014. “Comparing AHP and CBA as decision methods to resolve the choosing problem in detailed design”. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 141(1), 04014063. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000915.
Berardi, U. 2017. “Life cycle assessment of natural building materials: The role of carbonation, mixture components and transport in the environmental impacts of hempcrete blocks.” Journal of Cleaner Production. 149, 1051–1061, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.161.
Chan, F. T. S., and N. Kumar. 2007. “Global supplier development considering risk factors using fuzzy extended AHP-based approach,” Omega. 35(4), 417–431, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2005.08.004.
Fischer, M., and H. Adams. 2011. “Engineering-based decision in construction”. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 137(10), 751–754. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000304.
Govindan, K., K. M. Shankar, and D. Kannan. 2016. “Sustainable material selection for construction industry: A hybrid multi criteria decision making approach.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 55, 1274–1288, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.100.
Gurgun, A. P., and K. Koc. 2022. “Administrative risk challenging the adoption of smart contracts in construction projects.” Engineering, Construction, and Architectural Management. 29(2), 989–1015, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-09-2020-0678.
Jin, Z., and J. Gambatese. 2020. “A Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Approach to Technology Selection for Concrete Formwork Monitoring.” In Proc.; Construction Research Congress Tempe, Arizona, Nov., pp. 76–85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784482865.009.
Karakhan, A., J. Gambatese, and S. Rajendran. 2016. “Application of choosing by advantages decision-making system to select fall protection measures.” In Proc. 24th Annual Conference of the International Group of Lean Construction, Boston, MA, USA, sect. 11, pp. 33–42, Avail- able at: https://www.academia.edu/download/78884278/iglc-acddf514-7a03-46e2-b16e-abd4f1a232a8.pdf.
Lacerda, R. T. O., L. Ensslin, and S. R. Ensslin. 2011. “A performance measurement framework in portfolio management: A constructivist case.” Management Decision. 49(4), 648–668, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741111126530.
Melchart, L. 2007. “The Dutch sustainable building policy: A model for developing countries?” Building and Environment. 42(2), 893–901, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.10.007.
Parrish, K., and I. D. Tommelein. 2009. “Making design decisions using choosing by advantages”, In Proc. 17th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, Taipei, Taiwan, July 15-17, pp. 535–544, 2009, available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/288594063_Making_design_decisions_using_choosing_by_advantages.
Pitchipoo, P., P. Venukumar, and S. Rajakarunakaran. 2012. “Fuzzy hybrid decision model for supplier evaluation and selection”. International Journal of Production Research. 51(13), 3903–3919, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2012.756592.
Saaty, T. 1980. The analytic hierarchy process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Sigurour, S. F. 2009. “Critical success factors in project management: An ethical perspective.” School of Engineering and Natural Sciences, University of Iceland, https://skemman.is/bit-stream/1946/3020/1/SFS_Meistaraverkefni_fixed.pdf. (Last Accessed: 05/06/2023).
Steinfort, P., and D. Walker. 2007. “Critical success factors in project management globally and how they may be applied to aid projects.” In Proc. Baccarini (ed.) Proceedings of the PMOZ Achieving Excellence-4th Annual Project Management Australia Conference, Brisbane, Australia, pp. 28–31.
Zadeh, L. A. 1965. “Fuzzy sets,” Information and Control. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Construction Research Congress 2024
Construction Research Congress 2024
Pages: 423 - 434

History

Published online: Mar 18, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Shafayet Ahmed, Ph.D. [email protected]
1Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil and Construction Engineering, Western Michigan Univ., Kalamazoo, MI. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8317-6460. Email: [email protected]
2Assistant Professor, Dept. of Construction Management, Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, CO. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7680-617X. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$148.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$148.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share