Chapter
Mar 18, 2024

Systematic Review of Material Selection for Building Envelopes Based on Multi-Criterion Decision-Making

Publication: Construction Research Congress 2024

ABSTRACT

This study conducts a systematic literature review to evaluate existent studies on the use of multi-criterion decision-making (MCDM) methods for selecting building envelope materials and identifies the various criteria and weight distribution techniques employed in this process. The results and discussion section focuses on the environmental impact, cost, technical performance, and social impact criteria, as they were identified as the predominant criteria among the reviewed studies. The results demonstrate that environmental impact and cost criteria consistently carry higher weights in MCDM studies in comparison to the social impact criteria. It is also found that, while numerous MCDM methods have been employed in the building envelope material selection process, the use of a hybrid MCDM approach is found to be the most recommended course. Overall, the findings of this study assist construction specialists in understanding the current practices and limitations in material selection processes for building envelopes and provide insights for future research in this area.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.

REFERENCES

Aditya, L., Mahlia, T. M. I., Rismanchi, B., Ng, H. M., Hasan, M. H., Metselaar, H. S. C., Muraza, O., and Aditiya, H. B. (2017). A review on insulation materials for energy conservation in buildings. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 73, 1352–1365.
Akadiri, P. O., Olomolaiye, P. O., and Chinyio, E. A. (2013). Multi-criteria evaluation model for the selection of sustainable materials for building projects. Automation in Construction, 30, 113–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2012.10.004.
Aksakal, B., Ulutaş, A., Balo, F., and Karabasevic, D. (2022). A New Hybrid MCDM Model for Insulation Material Evaluation for Healthier Environment. Buildings, 12(5), 655.
Bostancioglu, E. (2021). Double skin façade assessment by fuzzy AHP and comparison with AHP. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 17(1–2), 110–130.
Bostancioglu, E., and Onder, N. P. (2019). Applying analytic hierarchy process to the evaluation of double skin façades. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 15(1), 66–82.
Chen, Z.-S., Martínez, L., Chang, J.-P., Wang, X.-J., Xionge, S.-H., and Chin, K.-S. (2019). Sustainable building material selection: A QFD- and ELECTRE III-embedded hybrid MCGDM approach with consensus building. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 85, 783–807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2019.08.006.
Civic, A., and Vucijak, B. (2014). Multi-criteria Optimization of Insulation Options for Warmth of Buildings to Increase Energy Efficiency. Procedia Engineering, 69, 911–920.
Gilani, G., Blanco, A., and de la Fuente, A. (2017). A New Sustainability Assessment Approach Based on Stakeholder’s Satisfaction for Building Façades. Energy Procedia, 115, 50–58.
Govindan, K., Madan Shankar, K., and Kannan, D. (2016). Sustainable material selection for construction industry – A hybrid multi criteria decision making approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 55, 1274–1288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.100.
Gusenbauer, M., and Haddaway, N. R. (2020). Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta-analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources. Research Synthesis Methods, 11(2), 181–217.
Hammad, A. W., Akbarnezhad, A., and Oldfield, P. (2018). Optimising embodied carbon and U-value in load bearing walls: A mathematical bi-objective mixed integer programming approach. Energy and Buildings, 174, 657–671.
Hatefi, S. M., Asadi, H., Shams, G., Tamošaitienė, J., and Turskis, Z. (2021). Model for the Sustainable Material Selection by Applying Integrated Dempster-Shafer Evidence Theory and Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS) Method. Sustainability, 13(18), 10438.
Lee, J.-S. (2021). Life Cycle Costing for Exterior Materials on Building Façade. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 147(7).
Mahmoudkelaye, S., Taghizade Azari, K., Pourvaziri, M., and Asadian, E. (2018). Sustainable material selection for building enclosure through ANP method. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 9, e00200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2018.e00200.
Martabid, J. E., and Mourgues, C. (2015). Criteria Used for Selecting Envelope Wall Systems in Chilean Residential Projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 141(12). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001025.
Martín-Martín, A., Thelwall, M., Orduna-Malea, E., and Delgado López-Cózar, E. (2021). Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations. Scientometrics, 126(1), 871–906. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03690-4.
Mathiyazhagan, K., Gnanavelbabu, A., and Lokesh Prabhuraj, B. (2019). A sustainable assessment model for material selection in construction industries perspective using hybrid MCDM approaches. Journal of Advances in Management Research, 16(2), 234–259.
Mayhoub, M. M. G., El Sayad, Z. M. T., Ali, A. A. M., and Ibrahim, M. G. (2021). Assessment of green building materials’ attributes to achieve sustainable building façades using ahp. Buildings, 11(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11100474.
Moghtadernejad, S., Chouinard, L. E., and Mirza, M. S. (2020). Design strategies using multi-criteria decision-making tools to enhance the performance of building façades. Journal of Building Engineering, 30, 101274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101274.
Mohammadi, P., Ramezanianpour, A. M., and Erfani, A. (2022). Identifying and Prioritizing Criteria for Selecting Sustainable Façade Materials of High-Rise Buildings. Construction Research Congress 2022, 583–593. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784483978.060.
Mousavi-Nasab, S. H., and Sotoudeh-Anvari, A. (2018). A new multi-criteria decision making approach for sustainable material selection problem: A critical study on rank reversal problem. Journal of Cleaner Production, 182, 466–484.
Moussavi Nadoushani, Z. S., Akbarnezhad, A., Ferre Jornet, J., and Xiao, J. (2017). Multi-criteria selection of façade systems based on sustainability criteria. Building and Environment, 121, 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.05.016.
Najjar, M., Figueiredo, K., Hammad, A. W. A., and Haddad, A. (2019). Integrated optimization with building information modeling and life cycle assessment for generating energy efficient buildings. Applied Energy, 250, 1366–1382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.05.101.
Reddy, A. S., Kumar, P. R., and Raj, P. A. (2019). Preference based multi-criteria framework for developing a Sustainable Material Performance Index (SMPI). International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 12(6), 390–403. https://doi.org/10.1080/19397038.2019.1581853.
Roy, J., Das, S., Kar, S., and Pamučar, D. (2019). An Extension of the CODAS Approach Using Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Set for Sustainable Material Selection in Construction Projects with Incomplete Weight Information. Symmetry, 11(3), 393.
Ruzgys, A., Volvačiovas, R., Ignatavičius, Č., and Turskis, Z. (2014). Integrated evaluation of external wall insulation in residential buildings using SWARA-TODIM MCDM method. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 20(1), 103–110.
Singh, V. K., Singh, P., Karmakar, M., Leta, J., and Mayr, P. (2021). The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 126(6), 5113–5142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03948-5.
Singhaputtangkul, N., Low, S. P., Teo, A. L., and Hwang, B.-G. (2014). Criteria for Architects and Engineers to Achieve Sustainability and Buildability in Building Envelope Designs. Journal of Management in Engineering, 30(2), 236–245.
Stephan, A., Jensen, C. A., and Crawford, R. H. (2017). Improving the Life Cycle Energy Performance of Apartment Units through Façade Design. Procedia Engineering, 196, 1003–1010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.08.042.
Teknologi, J., Kanniyapan, G., Sarrazin Mohammad, I., Jawahar Nesan, L., Hakim Mohammed, A., Ganisen, S., Bahru, J., and Johor Bahru, U. (2015). Façade Material Selection Criteria for Optimising Building Maintainability (Vol. 75, Issue 10). www.jurnalteknologi.utm.my.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Construction Research Congress 2024
Construction Research Congress 2024
Pages: 558 - 567

History

Published online: Mar 18, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Enric Barkokebas [email protected]
1M.Sc. Student, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9788-8477. Email: [email protected]
Valeria Vecchio [email protected]
2M.Sc. Student, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6244-194X. Email: [email protected]
Regina Dias Barkokebas, Ph.D. [email protected]
3Assistant Professor, DILAB School of Engineering and Dept. of Construction Engineering and Management, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5132-5695. Email: [email protected]
Mohamed Al-Hussein, Ph.D. [email protected]
4Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1774-9718. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$164.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$164.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share