How Much Distance Should Robots Keep from Other Workers at Construction Jobsites?
Publication: Construction Research Congress 2024
ABSTRACT
For autonomous robots deployed in human-populated workplaces, adhering to people’s interpersonal space is a key prerequisite for safe and efficient navigation. Especially in safety-critical work environments such as construction jobsites, robots should be capable of not only avoiding collisions but also maintaining a socially acceptable distance from other workers to achieve safety and efficiency. However, what is deemed as appropriate distance can vary based on work contexts. To this end, this study aims to understand the preferred interpersonal safety distance in different construction work contexts such as the size of the workspaces. We developed simulated work environments and conducted proxemics experiments. We found that participants tend to keep a larger minimum distance when interacting with a robot and in a more constrained condition than the normal one. Our findings can be used to develop a more safe, socially acceptable robot path planning in workplaces.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.
REFERENCES
Afsari, K., S. Halder, M. Ensafi, S. DeVito, and J. Serdakowski. 2021. “Fundamentals and Prospects of Four-Legged Robot Application in Construction Progress Monitoring.” EPiC Series in Built Environment, 274–283. EasyChair.
Brinck, I., C. Balkenius, and B. Johansson. 2016. “Making Place for Social Norms in the Design of Human-Robot Interaction.” What Social Robots Can and Should Do, 303–312. IOS Press. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-708-5-303.
Davila Delgado, J. M., L. Oyedele, A. Ajayi, L. Akanbi, O. Akinade, M. Bilal, and H. Owolabi. 2019. “Robotics and automated systems in construction: Understanding industry-specific challenges for adoption.” Journal of Building Engineering, 26: 100868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2019.100868.
Guo, S.-J. 2002. “Identification and Resolution of Work Space Conflicts in Building Construction.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 128 (4): 287–295. American Society of Civil Engineers. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2002)128:4(287).
Hall, E. T. (Edward T., 1914-2009. 1966. The hidden dimension. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday.
Hinds, P. J., T. L. Roberts, and H. Jones. 2004. “Whose Job Is It Anyway? A Study of Human-Robot Interaction in a Collaborative Task.” Human–Computer Interaction, 19 (1–2): 151–181. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2004.9667343.
Hosny, A., M. Nik-Bakht, and O. Moselhi. 2022. “Physical Distancing Analytics for Construction Planning Using 4D BIM.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng., 36 (4): 04022012. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0001023.
Inoue, R., T. Arai, Y. Toda, M. Tsujimoto, K. Taniguchi, and N. Kubota. 2019. “Intelligent Control for Illuminance Measurement by an Autonomous Mobile Robot.” 2019 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Robotics and its Social Impacts (ARSO), 270–274.
Jin, M., S. Liu, S. Schiavon, and C. Spanos. 2018. “Automated mobile sensing: Towards high-granularity agile indoor environmental quality monitoring.” Building and Environment, 127: 268–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.11.003.
Kim, P., J. Chen, J. Kim, and Y. K. Cho. 2018. “SLAM-Driven Intelligent Autonomous Mobile Robot Navigation for Construction Applications.” Advanced Computing Strategies for Engineering, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, I. F. C. Smith and B. Domer, eds., 254–269. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Lee, M.-F. R., and T.-W. Chien. 2020. “Intelligent Robot for Worker Safety Surveillance: Deep Learning Perception and Visual Navigation.” 2020 International Conference on Advanced Robotics and Intelligent Systems (ARIS), 1–6.
Lehmann, H., A. Rojik, and M. Hoffmann. 2020. Should a small robot have a small personal space? Investigating personal spatial zones and proxemic behavior in human-robot interaction.
Leichtmann, B., A. Lottermoser, J. Berger, and V. Nitsch. 2022. “Personal space in human-robot interaction at work: Effect of room size and working memory load.” J. Hum.-Robot Interact., 3536167. https://doi.org/10.1145/3536167.
Leichtmann, B., and V. Nitsch. 2020. “How much distance do humans keep toward robots? Literature review, meta-analysis, and theoretical considerations on personal space in human-robot interaction.” Journal of Environmental Psychology, 68: 101386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.101386.
Li, R., M. van Almkerk, S. van Waveren, E. Carter, and I. Leite. 2019. “Comparing Human-Robot Proxemics Between Virtual Reality and the Real World.” 2019 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), 431–439.
Mumm, J., and B. Mutlu. 2011. “Human-robot proxemics: Physical and psychological distancing in human-robot interaction.” 2011 6th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), 331–338.
Mutlu, B., and J. Forlizzi. 2008. “Robots in organizations: The role of workflow, social, and environmental factors in human-robot interaction.” 2008 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), 287–294.
Neef, N. E., S. Zabel, M. Lauckner, and S. Otto. 2022. What is Appropriate? On the Assessment of Human-Robot Proxemics for Casual Encounters in Closed Environment.
Syrdal, D. S., K. Dautenhahn, M. L. Walters, and K. L. Koay. 2008. Sharing spaces with robots in a home scenario - Anthropomorphic attributions and their effect on proxemic expectations and evaluations in a live HRI trial. 116–123.
Uzzell, D., and N. Horne. 2006. “The influence of biological sex, sexuality and gender role on interpersonal distance.” British Journal of Social Psychology, 45 (3): 579–597. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466605X58384.
Walters, M. L., K. Dautenhahn, R. te Boekhorst, K. L. Koay, C. Kaouri, S. Woods, C. Nehaniv, D. Lee, and I. Werry. 2005a. “The influence of subjects’ personality traits on personal spatial zones in a human-robot interaction experiment.” ROMAN 2005. IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2005., 347–352.
Walters, M. L., K. Dautenhahn, K. L. Koay, C. Kaouri, R. Boekhorst, C. Nehaniv, I. Werry, and D. Lee. 2005b. “Close encounters: spatial distances between people and a robot of mechanistic appearance.” 5th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, 2005., 450–455.
Worchel, S. 1986. “The influence of contextual variables on interpersonal spacing.” J Nonverbal Behav, 10 (4): 230–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00987482.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Construction Research Congress 2024
Pages: 893 - 902
History
Published online: Mar 18, 2024
ASCE Technical Topics:
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.