Identifying High-Risk Workers’ Actions Contributing to Highway Construction Accidents
Publication: Computing in Civil Engineering 2023
ABSTRACT
Analyzing historical construction accident narratives is widely implemented by researchers to understand critical causes of past accidents. Previous studies have identified accident causes and affected body parts to assist safety managers in making timely decisions to prevent accidents. However, the sequential relationship between workers’ actions and accidents, which can provide valuable insights, has not been investigated. This study addresses the gap by conducting a novel investigation into the most common sequential patterns between workers’ pre-accident actions and accidents. PrefixSpan sequential pattern mining algorithm was employed on large-scale sequential data extracted from Occupational Safety and Health Administration accident reports in highway construction. The results show that “operating machines or equipment” and “working at height” are the most common actions leading to severe highway construction accidents. Furthermore, the sequence pattern “operating machines or equipment → crushed by objects → fatality” ranks high among the top accident patterns, with an 80% confidence level. Organizations can use the findings to devise specific safety programs and interventions to mitigate future incidents.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.
REFERENCES
Alias, S., Razali, M. N., Fun, T. S., and Sainin, M. S. (2011). Sequential pattern mining using personalized minimum support threshold with minimum items. 2011 International Conference on Research and Innovation in Information Systems, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRIIS.2011.6125688.
Cheng, M. Y., Kusoemo, D., and Gosno, R. A. (2020). Text mining-based construction site accident classification using hybrid supervised machine learning. Automation in Construction, 118(May), 103265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103265.
Chokor, A., Naganathan, H., Chong, W. K., and Asmar, M. E. (2016). Analyzing Arizona OSHA Injury Reports Using Unsupervised Machine Learning. Procedia Engineering, 145, 1588–1593. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.04.200.
De Nooy, W., Mrvar, A., and Batagelj, V. (2018). Exploratory social network analysis with Pajek: Revised and expanded edition for updated software (Vol. 46). Cambridge university press.
Deng, D., Hou, Y., Zhang, J., and Wang, M. (2020). Analysis of Construction Accident Reports Based on C-BiLSTM Model. 2020 13th International Conference on Intelligent Computation Technology and Automation (ICICTA), 37–40.
Fournier-Viger, P., Lin, J. C.-W., Kiran, R. U., Koh, Y. S., and Thomas, R. (2017). A survey of sequential pattern mining. Data Science and Pattern Recognition, 1(1), 54–77.
Guo, S., Zhou, X., Tang, B., and Gong, P. (2020). Exploring the behavioral risk chains of accidents using complex network theory in the construction industry. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 560, 125012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2020.125012.
Halabi, Y., Xu, H., Long, D., Chen, Y., Yu, Z., Alhaek, F., and Alhaddad, W. (2022). Causal factors and risk assessment of fall accidents in the U.S. construction industry: A comprehensive data analysis (2000–2020). Safety Science, 146, 105537. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105537.
Heinrich, H. W., et al. (1941). Industrial Accident Prevention. A Scientific Approach. Industrial Accident Prevention. A Scientific Approach., Second Edition.
Jung, H., Choi, B., Kang, S., and Kang, Y. (2022). Temporal analysis of the frequency of accidents associated with construction equipment. Safety Science, 153, 105817.
Le, C., Shrestha, K. J., Jeong, H. D., and Damnjanovic, I. (2021). A sequential pattern mining driven framework for developing construction logic knowledge bases. Automation in Construction, 121, 103439. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103439.
Tixier, A. J.-P., Hallowell, M. R., Rajagopalan, B., and Bowman, D. (2016). Application of machine learning to construction injury prediction. Automation in Construction, 69, 102–114. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2016.05.016.
US Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2020). Occupational Injury and Illness Classification Manual. https://www.bls.gov/iif/home.htm.
Winge, S., Albrechtsen, E., and Mostue, B. A. (2019). Causal factors and connections in construction accidents. Safety Science, 112, 130–141. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2018.10.015.
Zhang, F., Fleyeh, H., Wang, X., and Lu, M. (2019). Construction site accident analysis using text mining and natural language processing techniques. Automation in Construction, 99(June 2018), 238–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2018.12.016.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Computing in Civil Engineering 2023
Pages: 443 - 451
History
Published online: Jan 25, 2024
ASCE Technical Topics:
- Business management
- Construction engineering
- Construction equipment
- Construction industry
- Construction management
- Employment
- Engineering fundamentals
- Equipment and machinery
- Infrastructure
- Infrastructure construction
- Labor
- Managers
- Occupational safety
- Personnel (type)
- Personnel management
- Practice and Profession
- Public administration
- Public health and safety
- Safety
- Traffic accidents
- Traffic engineering
- Traffic management
- Transportation engineering
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.