Rapid and Automated Vision-Based Post-Disaster Building Debris Estimation
Publication: Computing in Civil Engineering 2023
ABSTRACT
Debris removal is one of the most expensive and challenging aspects of recovery from disasters. Erroneous debris estimation and delayed cleanup operation can block or slow down access to affected areas, thus putting public health at risk, and seriously hinder effective post-disaster search-and-rescue (SAR) and resource allocation. Existing disaster debris estimation techniques merely produce rough estimates of debris volume with significant errors. Recent research has demonstrated the value of low-cost unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and artificial intelligence (AI) to rapidly collect information and assist in performing damage assessment of the building stock. However, the utility of AI models in debris estimation and classification is still underexplored. To this end, this study aims at enabling the measurement of debris volume and composition in residential structures from the outcome of AI-based damage assessment. Results from scaled experiments indicate that the proposed approach can provide high-fidelity estimation of disaster debris volume and composition.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.
REFERENCES
Aghababaei, M., Koliou, M., and Paal, S. G. (2018). “Performance assessment of building infrastructure impacted by the 2017 Hurricane Harvey in the Port Aransas region.” Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 32(5), 04018069.
Amadeo, K. (2018). “Hurricane Harvey facts, damage and costs.” The Balance.
Brown, C., Milke, M., and Seville, E. (2011). “Disaster waste management: A review article.” Waste management, 31(6), 1085–1098.
Chen, Z., Wagner, M., Das, J., Doe, R. K., and Cerveny, R. S. (2021). “Data-Driven Approaches for Tornado Damage Estimation with Unpiloted Aerial Systems.” Remote Sensing, 13(9), 1669.
Cheng, C.-S., Behzadan, A. H., and Noshadravan, A. (2022). “Bayesian Inference for Uncertainty-Aware Post-Disaster Damage Assessment Using Artificial Intelligence.” Computing in Civil Engineering 2021, 156–163.
Cheng, C. S., Behzadan, A. H., and Noshadravan, A. (2021). “Deep learning for post‐hurricane aerial damage assessment of buildings.” Computer‐Aided Civil Infrastructure Engineering, 36(6).
Cheng, C. S., Behzadan, A. H., and Noshadravan, A. (2022). “Uncertainty‐aware convolutional neural network for explainable artificial intelligence‐assisted disaster damage assessment.” Structural Control and Health Monitoring, e3019.
Cheng, C. S., Khajwal, A. B., Behzadan, A. H., and Noshadravan, A. (2023). “A Probabilistic Crowd-AI Framework for Reducing Uncertainty in Post-disaster Building Damage Assessment.” Journal of Engineering Mechanics.
Drenan, P., and Treloar, S. (2014). A Debris Management Handbook for State and Local DOTs and Departments of Public Works.
FEMA. (2003). Multi-hazard Loss Estimation Methodology: Hurricane Model HAZUS-MH MR3, Technical Manual.
FEMA. (2010). Debris Estimating Field Guide.
Ghaffarian, S., and Kerle, N. (2019). “Towards post-disaster debris identification for precise damage and recovery assessments from UAV and satellite images.” The International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 42, 297–302.
Gupta, R., Hosfelt, R., Sajeev, S., Patel, N., Goodman, B., Doshi, J., Heim, E., Choset, H., and Gaston, M. (2019). “xBD: A Dataset for Assessing Building Damage from Satellite Imagery.”.
Iqbal, U., Perez, P., and Barthelemy, J. (2021). “A process-driven and need-oriented framework for review of technological contributions to disaster management.” Heliyon, 7(11), e08405.
Jalloul, H., Choi, J., Yesiller, N., Manheim, D., and Derrible, S. (2022). “A systematic approach to identify, characterize, and prioritize the data needs for quantitative sustainable disaster debris management.” Resources, Conservation, Recycling, 180, 106174.
Khajwal, A. B., Cheng, C. S., and Noshadravan, A. (2022). “Post‐disaster damage classification based on deep multi‐view image fusion.” Computer‐Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering.
Meads, M., Gonzalez-Duenas, C., HighField, W., and Padgett, J. (2021). “Understanding and Deriving Land Use and Land Cover Variables as a Predictor of Debris from Coastal Storm Events.” AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts, 2021, A35I–1756.
Microsoft. (2020). USBuildingFootprints.
Nex, F., Duarte, D., Tonolo, F. G., and Kerle, N. (2019). “Structural Building Damage Detection with Deep Learning: Assessment of a State-of-the-art CNN in Operational Conditions.” Remote Sensing, 11(23), 2765.
Roueche, D., et al. (2021). Field Assessment Structural Teams: FAST-1, FAST-2, FAST-3", in StEER - Hurricane Laura. DesignSafe-CI.
Roueche, D. B., Lombardo, F. T., Krupar, R., and Smith, D. J. (2018). Collection of Perishable Data on Wind-and Surge-Induced Residential Building Damage During Hurricane Harvey (TX). DesignSafe-CI: Austin, TX, USA.
Sahin, H., Kara, B. Y., and Karasan, O. E. (2016). “Debris removal during disaster response: A case for Turkey.” Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 53, 49–59.
Tamura, Y. (2009). “Wind-induced damage to buildings and disaster risk reduction.” Proceedings of the APCWE-VII, Taipei, Taiwan.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
History
Published online: Jan 25, 2024
ASCE Technical Topics:
- Artificial intelligence and machine learning
- Buildings
- Business management
- Computer programming
- Computing in civil engineering
- Debris
- Disaster preparedness
- Disaster recovery
- Disaster risk management
- Disasters and hazards
- Environmental engineering
- Health hazards
- Pollutants
- Practice and Profession
- Public administration
- Public health and safety
- Residential buildings
- Solid wastes
- Structural engineering
- Structures (by type)
- Wastes
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.