ABSTRACT

Computational thinking-supported educational training can equip the construction workforce with the necessary skills and knowledge to implement sensing technologies and perform sensor data analytics aimed at enhancing construction operations. However, construction students struggle to understand the computational concepts and workflows required to translate low-level sensor data into knowledge for supporting decisions. This study compared the cognitive load of construction students performing similar data analytics tasks using an end-user programming environment (EUP) to conventional MS Excel. Comparative analysis using descriptive and inferential statistics demonstrated that participants using EUP perceived lower levels of cognitive loads and more positive experiences than those who used the conventional techniques. The study’s findings will advance the understanding of the potential cognitive effects of adopting EUPs for construction sensor data analytics. This study contributes to the cognitive theory of multimedia learning by illustrating how multimodal programming environments can influence learners’ cognitive demands.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.

REFERENCES

Arabshahi, M., Wang, D., Sun, J., Rahnamayiezekavat, P., Tang, W., Wang, Y., and Wang, X. (2021). “Review on Sensing Technology Adoption in the Construction Industry.” Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 21(24), 8307.
Baduge, S. K., Thilakarathna, S., Perera, J. S., Arashpour, M., Sharafi, P., Teodosio, B., Shringi, A., and Mendis, P. (2022). “Artificial intelligence and smart vision for building and construction 4.0: Machine and deep learning methods and applications.” Automation in Construction, 141, 104440.
Bau, D., Gray, J., Kelleher, C., Sheldon, J., and Turbak, F. (2017). “Learnable programming: blocks and beyond.” Communications of the ACM, 60(6), 72–80.
Glas, M., Vielberth, M., Reittinger, T., Böhm, F., and Pernul, G. (2023). “Improving cybersecurity skill development through visual programming.” Information & Computer Security, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print).
Gong, J., and Caldas, C. H. (2012). An Intelligent Video Computing Method for Automated Productivity Analysis of Cyclic Construction Operations. 64–73.
Google Inc. (2020). “Blockly Developers Google.” <https://developers.google.com/blockly>.
Krishnamurthi, R., Kumar, A., Gopinathan, D., Nayyar, A., and Qureshi, B. (2020). “An overview of IoT sensor data processing, fusion, and analysis techniques.” Sensors, 20(21), 6076.
Kumar, N., and Kumar, J. (2016). “Measurement of Cognitive Load in HCI Systems Using EEG Power Spectrum: An Experimental Study.” Procedia Computer Science, 84, 70–78.
Mansouri, S., Castronovo, F., and Akhavian, R. (2020). “Analysis of the Synergistic Effect of Data Analytics and Technology Trends in the AEC/FM Industry.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(3), 04019113.
Mayer, R. E. (2005). “Cognitive theory of multimedia learning.” The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning, 41, 31–48.
Mneymneh, B. E., Abbas, M., and Khoury, H. (2019). “Vision-Based Framework for Intelligent Monitoring of Hardhat Wearing on Construction Sites.” Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 33(2), 04018066.
Tawfik, A. A., Payne, L., and Olney, A. M. (2022). “Scaffolding Computational Thinking Through Block Coding: A Learner Experience Design Study.” Technology, Knowledge and Learning.
Tudoreanu, M. E. (2003). “Designing effective program visualization tools for reducing user’s cognitive effort.” Proceedings of the 2003 ACM symposium on Software visualization, Association for Computing Machinery, San Diego, California, 105–ff.
Tze Wei, L., and Su-Mae, T. (2016). “The Effects of Positive and Negative Mood on Cognition and Motivation in Multimedia Learning Environment.” Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 19(2), 104–115.
Unal, A., and Topu, F. B. (2021). “Effects of teaching a computer programming language via hybrid interface on anxiety, cognitive load level and achievement of high school students.” Education and Information Technologies, 26(5), 5291–5309.
Wing, J. M. (2008). “Computational thinking and thinking about computing.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 366(1881), 3717–3725.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Computing in Civil Engineering 2023
Computing in Civil Engineering 2023
Pages: 167 - 175

History

Published online: Jan 25, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Mohammad Khalid, S.M.ASCE [email protected]
1Myers Lawson School of Construction, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8668-3022. Email: [email protected]
Abiola A. Akanmu, Ph.D. [email protected]
2Associate Professor, Myers Lawson School of Construction, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA. Email: [email protected]
Anthony O. Yusuf, S.M.ASCE [email protected]
3Myers Lawson School of Construction, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1574-788X. Email: [email protected]
Homero Murzi, Ph.D. [email protected]
4Assistant Professor, Dept. of Engineering Education, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA. Email: [email protected]
Ibukun Awolusi, Ph.D. [email protected]
5Assistant Professor, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, and Construction Management, Univ. of Texas at San Antonio, TX. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8723-8609. Email: [email protected]
Nihar Gonsalves, Ph.D. [email protected]
6Myers Lawson School of Construction, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$198.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$198.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share