Chapter
Nov 14, 2023

Doing Bad Things for Good Reasons: An Examination of Unethical Pro-Organizational Behavior among Professional Engineers

Publication: ASCE Inspire 2023

ABSTRACT

Unethical behavior at work can be extremely costly, and unethical pro-organizational behavior poses a unique challenge. It suggests that there is a “dark side” to constructs thought to be productive, like organizational identification. Recent research suggests that individuals who identify highly with their organization are more likely to engage in unethical pro-organizational behavior and that moral disengagement mediates this relationship. Based on a sample of 281 professional engineers, this study suggests that organizational identification by itself does not predict unethical pro-organizational behavior. The study validates previous findings of a significant relationship between moral identity and moral disengagement and between moral disengagement and unethical pro-organizational behavior. It also provides the first empirical evidence of a significant relationship between work engagement and moral disengagement. While offering recommendations for workforce development to prevent unethical behavior among professional engineers, the study highlights the complexity of predicting and responding to the dark side of organizational identification.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.

REFERENCES

Aquino, K., and Reed, A. (2002). The self-importance of moral identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1423–1440. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.6.1423.
Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory of personality. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 154–196). Guilford Press.
Bandura, A. (2016). Moral disengagement; How people do harm and live with themselves. Worth Publishers.
Bazerman, M. H., and Tenbrunsel, A. E. (2011). Blind Spots: Why We Fail to Do What’s Right and What to Do about It. Princeton University Press.
Brown, M., and Mitchell, M. (2010). Ethical and unethical leadership: Exploring new avenues for future research. Business Ethics Quarterly, 20(4), 583–616. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq201020439.
Carsten, M. K., and Uhl-Bien, M. (2013). Ethical followership: An examination of followership beliefs and crimes of obedience. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 20(1), 49–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051812465890.
Chen, M., Chen, C., and Sheldon, O. (2016). Relaxing moral reasoning to win: How organizational identification relates to unethical pro-organizational behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(8), 1082–1096. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000111.
Coleman, J. (2022). It’s time to take a fresh look at your company’s values. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2022/03/its-time-to-take-a-fresh-look-at-your-companys-values.
Davis, F., Schoorman, F., Mayer, R., and Tan, H. (2000). The trusted general manager and business unit performance: Empirical evidence of a competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 563–576. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200005)21:5%3C563::AID-SMJ99%3E3.0.CO;2-0.
Dukerich, J., Kramer, R., and McLean Parks, J. (1998). The dark side of organizational identification. In D. Whetten, & P. Godfrey (Eds.), Identity in organizations: Building theory through conversations (pp. 245–256). Sage.
Durham, G. (2010). The spirit of the Quakers. Yale University Press.
Effelsberg, D., Solga, M., and Gurt, J. (2014). Transformational leadership and follower’s unethical behavior for the benefit of the company: A two-study investigation. Journal of Business Ethics, 120(1), 81–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1644-z.
Galvin, B., Lange, D., and Ashforth, B. (2015). Narcissistic organizational identification: Seeing oneself as central to the organization’s identity. Academy of Management Review, 40, 163–181. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2013.0103.
Hekman, D., Steensma, H., Bigley, A., and Hereford, J. (2009). Effects of organizational and professional identification on the relationship between administrator’s social influence and professional employees’ adoption of new work behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(5), 1325–1335. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015315.
Johnson, C. (2014). Why “good” followers go “bad”: The power of moral disengagement. Journal of Leadership Education, 13(4), 36–50. https://doi.org/10.12806/V13/I4/C6.
Karpoff, J. M., Lott, J. R., and Wehrly, E. W. (2005). The reputational penalties for environmental violations: Empirical evidence. The Journal of Law and Economics, 48, 653–675. https://doi.org/10.1086/430806.
Kelly, J. (2020). Wells Fargo forced to pay $3 billion for the bank’s fake account scandal. Forbes. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/jackkelly/2020/02/24/wells-fargo-forced-to-pay-3-billion-for-the-banks-fake-account-scandal/?sh=3761a89a42d2.
Lee, A., Schwarz, G., Newman, A., and Legood, A. (2019). Investigating when and why psychological entitlement predicts unethical pro-organizational behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 154(1), 109–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3456-z.
Mael, F., and Ashforth, B. (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 103–123. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030130202.
Mahlendorf, M., Matejka, M., and Weber, J. (2018). Determinant of financial managers’ willingness to engage in unethical pro-organizational behavior. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 30(2), 81–104. https://doi.org/10.2308/jmar-51957.
Mishra, M., Ghosh, K., and Sharma, D. (2021). Unethical pro-organizational behavior: A systematic review and future research agenda. Journal of Business Ethics, 168(4), 777–793. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04764-w.
Moore, C., Detert, J., Klebe Treviño, L., Baker, V., and Mayer, D. (2012). Why employees do bad things: Moral disengagement and unethical organizational behavior. Personnel Psychology, 65(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2011.01237.x.
Newman, A., Le, H., North-Samardzic, A., and Cohen, M. (2020). Moral disengagement at work: A review and research agenda. Journal of Business Ethics, 167(3), 535–570. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04173-0.
Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., and Becker, J.-M. (2015). SmartPLS 4. Retrieved from https://www.smartpls.com.
Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., and Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 71–92. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015630930326.
Schon, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.
Sinderson, G. (2021). 10 years later: A look at the financial toll of the Jerry Sandusky scandal on Penn State. WJAC TV. Retrieved from https://wjactv.com/news/local/10-years-later-a-look-at-the-financial-toll-of-the-jerry-sandusky-scandal-on-penn-state.
Umphress, E. E., and Bingham, J. B. (2011). When employees do bad things for good reasons. Organization Science, 22(3), 621–640. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0559.
Umphress, E. E., Bingham, J. B., and Mitchell, M. S. (2010). Unethical behavior in the name of the company: The moderating effect of organizational identification and positive reciprocity beliefs on unethical pro-organizational behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(4), 769–780. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019214.
Valle, M., Kacmar, K., and Zivnuska, S. (2019). Understanding the effects of political environments on unethical behavior in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 156(1), 173–188. https://doi.org/10.1007%2Fs10551-017-3576-5.
Vecchione, M., Alessandri, G., and Barbaranelli, C. (2013). Measurement and application of egoistic and moralistic self-enhancement. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 21(2), 170–182. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12027.
Wissenbach, I. (2020). New emissions blow for VW as German court backs damages claims. Reuters. Retrieved from https://www.reuters.com/article/us-volkswagen-emissions-lawsuit/new-emissions-blow-for-vw-as-german-court-backs-damages-claims-idUSKBN2310XG.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to ASCE Inspire 2023
ASCE Inspire 2023
Pages: 802 - 810

History

Published online: Nov 14, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Kyle Payne, Ph.D. [email protected]
1Collins Engineers, Chicago, IL. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$230.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$230.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share