Risk Assessment Models for Pipeline Infrastructure Failure
Publication: ASCE Inspire 2023
ABSTRACT
Pipeline failures caused by aging, corrosion, and damage may result in irreparable societal, economic, and environmental consequences. Therefore, pipeline safety and integrity are crucial to the robustness of modern societies. However, current pipeline risk analysis and management have some limitations in predicting pipeline holistic failure for integrity management. In this paper, we develop a machine learning-based risk model to predict the failure type of pipelines. We train and test the risk models based on the historical data from a report covering 50 years of spillage data in Europe. Various factors, such as pipeline diameter, age, pipeline location, and land use, are considered in the models. We propose nine risk models and apply the support vector machine (SVM) approach to obtain the best model type with the highest prediction accuracy. The best risk model will provide pipeline operators with an efficient and effective way to evaluate pipeline conditions and guide pipeline rehabilitation and maintenance procedures.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.
REFERENCES
Bonvicini, S., Antonioni, G., Morra, P., and Cozzani, V. (2015). Quantitative assessment of environmental risk due to accidental spills from onshore pipelines. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 93, 31–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2014.04.007.
EGIG (European Gas pipeline Incident Data Group). (2020). Gas Pipeline Incidents,. Doc. Number VA 20.0432.
Harirchian, E., Lahmer, T., Kumari, V., and Jadhav, K. (2020). Application of Support Vector Machine Modeling for the Rapid Seismic Hazard Safety Evaluation of Existing Buildings. Energies, 13(13), 3340. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13133340.
Khan, T. A., Shahid, Z., Alam, M., Su’ud, M. M., and Kadir, K. (2019). Early Flood Risk Assessment using Machine Learning: A Comparative study of SVM, Q-SVM, K-NN and LDA. 2019 13th International Conference on Mathematics, Actuarial Science, Computer Science and Statistics (MACS), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/MACS48846.2019.9024796.
Mahgerefteh, H., and Atti, O. (2006). An analysis of the gas pipeline explosion at Ghislenghien Belgium. In: Paper Presented at the AIChE Spring National Meeting and 2nd Global Congress on Process Safety, April, Orlando, FL, pp. 17–23.
Manan, A., Kamal, K., Ratlamwala, T. A. H., Sheikh, M. F., Abro, A. G., and Zafar, T. (2021). Failure classification in natural gas pipe-lines using artificial intelligence: A case study. Energy Reports, 7, 7640–7647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2021.10.093.
Pan, Y., Zhang, L., Wu, X., and Skibniewski, M. J. (2020). Multi-classifier information fusion in risk analysis. Information Fusion, 60, 121–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2020.02.003.
Ramírez-Camacho, J. G., Carbone, F., Pastor, E., Bubbico, R., and Casal, J. (2017). Assessing the consequences of pipeline accidents to support land-use planning. Safety Science, 97, 34–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2016.01.021.
Wei, Y., Zhang, J., and Wang, J. (2018). Research on Building Fire Risk Fast Assessment Method Based on Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation and SVM. Procedia Engineering, 211, 1141–1150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.12.121.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
History
Published online: Nov 14, 2023
ASCE Technical Topics:
- Analysis (by type)
- Artificial intelligence and machine learning
- Computer programming
- Computing in civil engineering
- Disaster risk management
- Engineering fundamentals
- Failure analysis
- Infrastructure
- Infrastructure vulnerability
- Model accuracy
- Models (by type)
- Pipe failures
- Pipeline management
- Pipeline systems
- Pipelines
- Risk management
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.