Chapter 8
Model Verification, Calibration, and Validation
Publication: Computational Fluid Dynamics Modeling in Water Infrastructure: Best Practices
Abstract
As the use of CFD models continues to raise to support the analysis of complex water infrastructure projects, they need to be adequately verified, calibrated, and validated; processes typically termed for simplicity as VV. Verification and validation are the primary means to assess accuracy and reliability in computational simulations. Such processes are key components of the best CFD modeling practices involving, among others, convergence and mesh independency tests, whereas they are antecedent to postprocessing visualization, documentation, and reporting steps. In CFD, the amount of uncertainty involved depends directly on the solution of the Navier-Stokes equations, which are technically parabolic nonlinear, nonhomogeneous, partial differential equations. Once model verification is carried out, the model needs to be calibrated. Calibration ensures that the matching between analytical or experimental values and model results is accurate within established standards via the iterative adjusting of model parameters.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.
References
AIAA (American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics). 2002. Guide: Guide for the verification and validation of computational fluid dynamics simulations. AIAA G-077-1998. Reston, VA: AIAA.
Gupta, H. V., K. J. Beven, and T. Wagener. 2006. Model calibration and uncertainty estimation, encyclopedia of hydrological sciences. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Liu, X., J. Zhang, K. Nielsen, and Y. A. Cataño-Lopera. 2020. “Challenges and opportunities of computational fluid dynamics in water, wastewater, and stormwater treatment.” J. Environ. Eng. 146 (11): 02520002.
McCutcheon, S. C., Z. Donwei, and S. Bird. 1990. Model calibration, validation and use: Manual for performing waste load allocations. USEPA-823-R-92-003. Washington, DC: Environmental Protection Agency.
NPARC Alliance CFD Verification and Validation Website. 2021. “Overview of CFD verification and validation.” Accessed July 10, 2023. https://www.grc.nasa.gov/www/wind/valid/tutorial/overview.html.
Oberkampf, W. L., and T. G. Trucano. 2002. Verification and validation in computational fluid dynamics. Albuquerque, NM: Sandia National Laboratories.
Pirkl, L. 2021. “CFD is not a calculator.” Accessed December 20, 2022. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/cfd-calculator-lubos-pirkl/?trackingId=JfDIkRQzmAbVxWI7CKI0zg%3D%3D.
Versteeg, H. K., and W. Malalasekera. 2007. An introduction to computational fluid dynamics: The finite volume method. London: Pearson Publications.
Wicklein, E., D. Batstone, J. Ducoste, J. Laurent, et al. 2015. “Good modelling practice in applying computational fluid dynamics for WWTP modelling.” Water Sci. Technol. 73 (5): wst.2015.565.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Computational Fluid Dynamics Modeling in Water Infrastructure: Best Practices
Pages: 41 - 47
Editor: Yovanni A. Cataño-Lopera, Ph.D., P.E., D.WRE
ISBN (Online): 978-0-7844-8512-5
Copyright
© 2023 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Oct 3, 2023
ASCE Technical Topics:
- Calibration
- Computational fluid dynamics technique
- Computer models
- Engineering fundamentals
- Equations (by type)
- Fluid dynamics
- Fluid mechanics
- Hydrologic engineering
- Mathematics
- Measurement (by type)
- Methodology (by type)
- Model accuracy
- Models (by type)
- Navier-Stokes equations
- Research methods (by type)
- Simulation models
- Validation
- Verification
- Water and water resources
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.