Using Life-Cycle Cost Analyses (LCCA) to Evaluate Large Diameter Water Pipeline Maintenance Strategies
Publication: Pipelines 2023
ABSTRACT
The Central Arizona Project (CAP) operates and maintains two (2) 21-ft (6.4 m) diameter steel pipes as part of the aqueduct system that delivers almost 2 billion gallons of Colorado River water per day, to Maricopa, Pinal, and Pima Counties in central and southern Arizona. The water is delivered to municipalities, industries, Native American communities, and agricultural users; over 5 million people (more than 80% of the population of Arizona) are provided water by the aqueduct system. The approximately 350 mi (563 km) long aqueduct system is composed of about 300 mi (483 km) of open channel canals, about 10 mi (16 km) of tunnels, and roughly 40 mi (64 km) of pipelines. The system traverses rugged mountains, desolate deserts, and highly populated urban areas as it conveys water from Lake Havasu at the western edge of the state to just beyond the southern boundary of the San Xavier Indian Reservation south of Tucson. As the aqueduct spans the state, it crosses several natural waterways. To facilitate not interrupting the natural waterways, the open channel canal transitions to a closed conduit and proceeds beneath the watercourse. Depending on the location within the aqueduct these pipelines range in size from 13-ft (3.9 m) to 21-ft (6.4 m), and include steel, monolithic concrete, and prestressed concrete pipelines. These large diameter water pipelines can be considered “forever assets”—there is no real service end-of-life, but there may be an economic end-of-life; for pipelines that is when it is more economical to replace the entire pipeline rather than continue to perform scheduled and unscheduled maintenance and/or repair. This paper examines the evaluation and results of a life-cycle cost analysis (LCCA) performed by CAP in attempting to determine the most cost-effective strategy in maintaining not only the two large diameter steel water pipelines but apply the maintenance strategies analyzed to CAP’s other pipelines.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.
REFERENCES
ASCE. 2013. Pipelines for Water Conveyance and Drainage, MOP 125, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA.
PICA (Pipeline Inspection and Condition Analysis Corporation). 2016. How to Create a Sustainable Water Pipeline Infrastructure, PICAcorp.com, Article ID 100.
USBR (United States Bureau of Reclamation). 2018. Agua Fria Siphon Coating Inspection and Impedance Analysis, October 2018, Materials and Corrosion Laboratory, 8540-2018-58, US Bureau of Reclamation, US Department of the Interior, Denver, CO.
USBR (United States Bureau of Reclamation). 2018. Salt River Siphon Coating Inspection and Impedance Analysis, December 2018, Materials and Corrosion Laboratory, 8540-2018-73, US Bureau of Reclamation, US Department of the Interior, Denver, CO.
Water World. 1999. Aging Pipe Proves Expensive for Municipalities, www.waterworld.com, Article 16193361, April 1, 1999.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
History
Published online: Aug 10, 2023
ASCE Technical Topics:
- Aqueducts
- Architectural engineering
- Building management
- Business management
- Concrete pipes
- Infrastructure
- Life cycles
- Light rail transit
- Maintenance and operation
- Pipe sizes
- Pipeline systems
- Pipelines
- Pipes
- Practice and Profession
- Rail transportation
- Steel pipes
- Transportation engineering
- Water and water resources
- Water management
- Water pipelines
- Water supply
- Water supply systems
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.