Automated Interpretation and Evaluation of Spatial Variability and Model Uncertainty in Geotechnical Site Characterization
Publication: Geo-Risk 2023
ABSTRACT
Spatial variability of subsurface conditions and uncertainty in implementing methods and models for geotechnical site characterization are critical factors that contribute to financial and safety risks in transportation construction projects. As advanced data-rich techniques and methodologies are developed and implemented for geotechnical site characterization, design, and analysis, new tools are needed to leverage these techniques. A web-based platform will be introduced to provide innovative ways to automate and optimize the process of geotechnical site characterization. Specifically, this platform allows engineers to interactively visualize and efficiently evaluate and interpret statistical features of geotechnical data to facilitate development of design models. This is accomplished by automated evaluating model uncertainty using statistical analysis techniques incorporated into the Federal Highway Administration’s (FHWA’s) Geotechnical Engineering Circular (GEC) No. 5. This web-based platform has been implemented in several large highway and bridge design and construction projects with the Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development (LADOTD). Prototype project case histories will be briefly introduced in the paper. This web-based platform can be extended to incorporate a deep foundation database from LADOTD to eventually facilitate calibrating site-specific resistance factors from the load and resistance factor design (LRFD) methods for deep foundation design.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.
REFERENCES
Loehr, J. E., D. Ding, and W. J. Likos. (2015). Effect of Number of Soil Strength Measurements on Reliability of Spread Footing Designs. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2511, Transportation Research Board, 37–44.
Loehr, J. E., A. Lutenegger, B. L. Rosenblad, A. Boeckmann, and P. Brinckerhoff. (2016). Geotechnical Site Characterization Geotechnical Engineering Circular No. 5. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C.
Loehr, J. E., J. J. Bowders, B. L. Rosenblad, R. Luna, N. Maerz, R. W. Stephenson, W. J. Likos, and L. Ge. (2013). “Implementation of LRFD Methods to Quantify Value of Site Characterization Activities.” In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 1831–1834.
Robertson, P. K. (2009). “Interpretation of cone penetration tests – a unified approach.” Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 46(11): 1337–1355.
Peng, X., and J. G. Rauser. (2021). “A Geotechnical Web-based System with DIGGS Implementation.” A-GaME 2020-2021 Winter Webinar Series Invitation to Webinar #9, Post-Game Analysis: Making the Most of your Methods. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C. <https://youtu.be/1kwkl8OpmcE?t=1245>(Feb. 2, 2021).
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
History
Published online: Jul 20, 2023
ASCE Technical Topics:
- Construction engineering
- Construction management
- Construction sites
- Continuum mechanics
- Design (by type)
- Dynamics (solid mechanics)
- Engineering fundamentals
- Engineering mechanics
- Foundation design
- Foundations
- Geohazards
- Geotechnical engineering
- Geotechnical investigation
- Geotechnical models
- Load and resistance factor design
- Load factors
- Models (by type)
- Motion (dynamics)
- Project management
- Site investigation
- Solid mechanics
- Structural design
- Uncertainty principles
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.