Reducing Uncertainty and Risk of a Dam by Site Investigation, Quantitative Analysis, Model Calibration, and Observational Method
Publication: Geo-Risk 2023
ABSTRACT
Insufficient knowledge of the ground condition may lead to design failure or issues during/after construction, which is particularly critical for dam safety. Nevertheless, performing a comprehensive site investigation may not be practical due to limitations about time, budget, or accessibility. To better understand and further reduce the uncertainties and risks, the rational approach is combining multiple methods, such as site investigation, quantitative analysis, modeling, and instrumentation and monitoring, along with applying observational method throughout project. The paper introduces a project of constructing a new bridge adjacent to a more than 100-years reservoir dam, while keeping dam operational during construction. In the project, a combination of multiple means was applied to efficiently reduce the uncertainty and risk when very limited information was available. The paper presents the measures that have been taken to increase understanding about the site conditions. The uncertainty and probability of failure before and after acquiring more information were quantitively evaluated. The results show that the uncertainty in seepage and slope stability have been greatly reduced with the coefficient of variation values have been reduced from 0.62 to 0.41 and from 0.23 to 0.08, respectively, so as the probabilities of failure have also been reduced.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.
REFERENCES
Christian, J. T. (2004). “Geotechnical Engineering Reliability: How Well Do We Know What We Are Doing?” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 130, No. 10, pp. 985–1003.
Duncan, J. M. (2000). “Factors of Safety and Reliability in Geotechnical Engineering”, ASCE, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 126(4), pp. 307–316.
Duncan, J. M., and S. G. Wright. Soil strength and slope stability. John Wiley & Sons, 2005.
Goldsworthy, J. S., M. B. Jaksa, W. Kaggwa, G. A. Fenton, D. V. Griffiths, and H. G. Poulos. (2004). “Cost of Foundation Failures due to Limited Site Investigation,” The International Conference on Structural and Foundation Failures, pp. 2–4.
Harr, M. E. (1987). Reliability-Based Design in Civil Engineering, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Kulhawy, F. H. (1992). On the Evaluation of Soil Properties, Geotechnical Special Publication 31, ASCE, Reston, VA, pp. 95–115.
Loehr, J. E., A. Lutenegger, B. L. Rosenblad, and A. Boeckmann. (2016). Geotechnical Site Characterization Geotechnical Engineering Circular No. 5. National Highway Institute (US).
Peck, R. B. (1969). “Advantages and Limitations of the Observational Method in Applied Soil Mechanics,” Geotechnique, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 171–187.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
History
Published online: Jul 20, 2023
ASCE Technical Topics:
- Analysis (by type)
- Construction engineering
- Construction industry
- Construction management
- Construction sites
- Continuum mechanics
- Dam failures
- Disaster risk management
- Disasters and hazards
- Dynamics (solid mechanics)
- Engineering fundamentals
- Engineering mechanics
- Failure analysis
- Failures (by type)
- Geotechnical engineering
- Geotechnical investigation
- Infrastructure construction
- Man-made disasters
- Motion (dynamics)
- Project management
- Risk management
- Site investigation
- Solid mechanics
- Uncertainty principles
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.