Do Ridesharing Services Reduce Traffic Crashes and Injuries? A Case Study
Publication: International Conference on Transportation and Development 2023
ABSTRACT
Demand-responsive ridesharing services have gained popularity in the recent past and are being adopted by several cities as alternative or means to augment existing public transit services. Empirical studies have explored the impacts of demand-responsive ridesharing services such as congestion, travel patterns, traffic flows, and emissions; however, how these services impact traffic safety in terms of traffic crashes and injuries could not get much attention. Previous studies on safety effects of ridesharing services are based on (un)availability of a ridesharing service; however, this study argues that or absence of a service is not enough to have a significant impact on traffic safety, rather it is that actual usage of a service that makes a difference. This research purposes to investigate the impacts of ridesharing services on traffic safety, using RideAustin, a ridesharing service in Austin, Texas, as a case study. The results show that the number of traffic crashes decreased to statistically significant level with an increase in the number of trips in a block group to a certain threshold. Just presence of the service or very low ridership (less than one ride per block group) did not indicate any effect on the number of crashes indicating no impact on traffic safety. Findings of this analysis will help to understand the safety impacts of ridesharing services.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.
REFERENCES
Alexander, L. P., and M. C. González. 2015. “Assessing the impact of real-time ridesharing on urban traffic using mobile phone data.” Proc UrbComp, 1–9.
Anderson, D. N. 2014. “‘Not just a taxi’? For-profit ridesharing, driver strategies, and VMT.” Transportation, 41 (5): 1099–1117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-014-9531-8.
Barrios, J. M., Y. V. Hochberg, and H. L. Yi. 2019. The Cost of Convenience: Ridesharing and Traffic Fatalities. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network.
Brazil, N., and D. Kirk. 2020. “Ridehailing and alcohol-involved traffic fatalities in the United States: The average and heterogeneous association of Uber.” PLOS ONE, 15 (9): e0238744. Public Library of Science. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238744.
Brazil, N., and D. S. Kirk. 2016. “Uber and metropolitan traffic fatalities in the United States.” Am. J. Epidemiol., 184 (3): 192–198. Oxford University Press.
Clewlow, R. R., and G. S. Mishra. 2017. Disruptive transportation: The adoption, utilization, and impacts of ride-hailing in the United States.
Dills, A. K., and S. E. Mulholland. 2018. “Ride‐sharing, fatal crashes, and crime.” South. Econ. J., 84 (4): 965–991. Wiley Online Library.
Greenwood, B. N., and S. Wattal. 2015. “Show me the way to go home: an empirical investigation of ride sharing and alcohol related motor vehicle homicide.”.
Hall, J. D., C. Palsson, and J. Price. 2018. “Is Uber a substitute or complement for public transit?” J. Urban Econ., 108: 36–50. Elsevier.
Kirk, D. S., N. Cavalli, and N. Brazil. 2020. “The implications of ridehailing for risky driving and road accident injuries and fatalities.” Soc. Sci. Med., 250: 112793. Elsevier.
Koffman, D. 2004. Operational experiences with flexible transit services. Transportation Research Board.
Liu, X., W. Li, Y. Li, J. Fan, and Z. Shen. 2021. “Quantifying environmental benefits of ridesplitting based on observed data from ridesourcing services.” Transp. Res. Rec., 2675 (8): 355–368. SAGE Publications Inc. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198121997827.
Lucken, E., K. Trapenberg Frick, and S. A. Shaheen. 2019. “‘Three Ps in a MOD:’ Role for mobility on demand (MOD) public-private partnerships in public transit provision.” Res. Transp. Bus. Manag., The Future of Public Transport, 32: 100433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2020.100433.
Morrison, C. N., S. F. Jacoby, B. Dong, M. K. Delgado, and D. J. Wiebe. 2018. “Ridesharing and motor vehicle crashes in 4 US cities: An interrupted time-series analysis.” Am. J. Epidemiol., 187 (2): 224–232. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwx233.
Rayle, L., D. Dai, N. Chan, R. Cervero, and S. Shaheen. 2016. “Just a better taxi? A survey-based comparison of taxis, transit, and ridesourcing services in San Francisco.” Transp. Policy, 45: 168–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.10.004.
Rayle, L., S. Shaheen, N. Chan, D. Dai, and R. Cervero. 2014. App-based, on-demand ride services: Comparing taxi and ridesourcing trips and user characteristics in San Francisco University of California Transportation Center (UCTC). Univ. Calif. Berkeley U. S.
Schaller, B. 2018. The new automobility: Lyft, Uber and the future of American cities.
Schaller Consulting. 2017. UNSUSTAINABLE? The Growth of App-Based Ride Services and Traffic, Travel and the Future of New York City.
Shaheen, S., and A. Cohen. 2019. “Shared ride services in North America: definitions, impacts, and the future of pooling.” Transp. Rev., 39 (4): 427–442. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2018.1497728.
Shaheen, S., A. Cohen, B. Yelchuru, S. Sarkhili, and B. A. Hamilton. 2017. Mobility on demand operational concept report. United States. Department of Transportation. Intelligent Transportation.
Sinha, S., and A. Laha. 2019. “Food price shocks and the changing pattern of consumption expenditure across decile classes in rural and urban India: A difference-in-difference analysis.” Stud. Agric. Econ., 121 (3). Research Institute for Agricultural Economics.
Tsay, S., Z. Accuardi, B. Schaller, and K. Hovenkotter. 2016. Private mobility, public interest: how public agencies can work with emerging mobility providers.
Volinski, J. 2019. “Microtransit or general public demand-response transit services: State of the practice.”.
Yan, X., J. Levine, and X. Zhao. 2019. “Integrating ridesourcing services with public transit: An evaluation of traveler responses combining revealed and stated preference data.” Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol., 105: 683–696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2018.07.029.
Zheng, H., X. Chen, and X. M. Chen. 2019. “How does on-demand ridesplitting influence vehicle use and purchase willingness? A case study in Hangzhou, China.” IEEE Intell. Transp. Syst. Mag., 11 (3): 143–157. https://doi.org/10.1109/MITS.2019.2919503.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
International Conference on Transportation and Development 2023
Pages: 171 - 179
History
Published online: Jun 13, 2023
ASCE Technical Topics:
- Case studies
- Engineering fundamentals
- Infrastructure
- Methodology (by type)
- Public transportation
- Research methods (by type)
- Traffic accidents
- Traffic analysis
- Traffic congestion
- Traffic engineering
- Traffic management
- Traffic safety
- Transportation engineering
- Transportation management
- Transportation safety
- Travel patterns
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.