ABSTRACT

The ASCE Manual of Practice (MOP) 150, “Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development and Implementation: Models, Methods, and Resources,” was written by the ASCE-EWRI TMDL Analysis and Modeling Task Committee. Chapter 12 of the MOP, “Modeling for Total Maximum Daily Load Implementation,” discusses state-of-the-practice on uses of models in TMDL implementation planning. The committee is currently expanding its work. In this paper, an overview of green infrastructure (GI) and modeling of those for TMDL implementation and reviews of specific models, including the USEPA’s GI Modeling Toolkit and the Landscape and Green Infrastructure Design (L-GrlD) model for designing GI strategies with flexibility to support stakeholder engagement and decision support tools for stormwater management that can advance the TMDL implementation state-of-the-practice, are presented. Non-traditional approaches are presented with cost-effective implementation while broadening the scope of TMDL to combine with other similar watershed management efforts for greater synergy. Designing of TMDL implementation measures (e.g., BMPs), including engaging stakeholders and managing multiple co-benefits and diverse costs, is discussed as those are crucial steps for the success of TMDLs. Emerging technologies, for example, remote sensing, are discussed with an example from the perspective of efficacy of the implementation measures in the long run.

Get full access to this chapter

View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.

REFERENCES

Ahmadisharaf, E., M. Tajrishy, and N. Alamdari. 2016. Integrating flood hazard into site selection of detention basins using spatial multi-criteria decision-making. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 59(8), 1397–1417.
Alamdari, N., and D. J. Sample. 2019. A multi-objective simulation-optimization tool for assisting in urban watershed restoration planning. Journal of Cleaner Production 213, 251–261.
Almendinger, J. E., and J. S. Ulrich. 2017. “Use of SWAT to Estimate Spatial Scaling of Phosphorus Export Coefficients and Load Reductions Due to Agricultural BMPS.” J Am Water Resour Assoc, 53 (3): 547–561. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12523.
Arabi, M, J. R. Frankenberger, B. A. Engle, and J. G. Arnold. 2007. Representation of agricultural conservation practices with SWAT. Hydrol. Process. 22(16): 3042–3055.
ASCE-EWRI TMDL Analysis and Modeling Task Committee. 2022. Total Maximum Daily Load Development and Implementation: Models, Methods, and Resources. ASCE Manuals and Reports on Engineering Practice No. 150, Eds. H.X. Zhang, N.W.T. Quinn, D.K. Borah, and G. Padmanabhan, ASCE, Reston, VA. Available at https://ascelibrary.org/doi/book/10.1061/9780784415948.
Ator, S. W., J. D. Blomquist, J. S. Webber, and J. G. Chanat. 2020. “Factors driving nutrient trends in streams of the Chesapeake Bay watershed.” Journal of Environmental Quality, 49 (4): 812–834. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeq2.20101.
Babbar-Sebens, M., R. C. Barr, L. P. Tedesco, and M. Anderson. 2013. Spatial identification and optimization of upland wetlands in agricultural watersheds. Ecological Engineering, 52:130–142.
Bekele, E. G., and J. W. Nicklow. 2005. Multiobjective management of ecosystem services by integrative watershed modeling and evolutionary algorithms. Water Resources Research, 41:1–10.
Birch, M. B. L., B. M. Gramig, W. R. Moomaw, O. C. Doering III, and C. J. Reeling. 2011. “Why Metrics Matter: Evaluating Policy Choices for Reactive Nitrogen in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 45 (1): 168–174. https://doi.org/10.1021/es101472z.
“BMP Design Specifications | Virginia DEQ.” n.d. Accessed October 25, 2022. https://www.deq.virginia.gov/water/stormwater/stormwater-construction/bmp-design-specifications.
CEPA (California Environmental Protection Agency). 2002. Total Maximum Daily Load for Salinity and Boron in the Lower San Joaquin River. Staff report by the Regional Water Quality Control Board, Central Valley Region.
Dell, H., T. M. Razzaghmanesh, S. Sharvelle, and M. Arabi. 2021. “Development and Application of a SWMM-Based Simulation Model for Municipal Scale Hydrologic Assessments.” Water 13, no. 12: 1644. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13121644.
Dosskey, M. G. 2001. “Toward Quantifying Water Pollution Abatement in Response to Installing Buffers on Crop Land.” Environmental Management, 28 (5): 577–598. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002670010245.
Frost, W. H., R. C. Lott, and R. J. La Plante. 2022. Modeling for Total Maximum Daily Load Implementation. Chapter 12 in Total Maximum Daily Load Development and Implementation: Models, Methods, and Resources. ASCE Manuals and Reports on Engineering Practice No. 150, Eds. H.X. Zhang, N.W.T. Quinn, D.K. Borah, and G. Padmanabhan, ASCE, Reston, VA, pp 359–380. Available at https://ascelibrary.org/doi/book/10.1061/9780784415948.
Gardner, R. L., and R. A. Young. 1988. Assessing Strategies for Control of Irrigation-Induced Salinity in the Upper Colorado River Basin. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 70(1):37–49.
Groot, J. C. J., W. A. H. Rossing, A. Jellema, D. J. Stobbelaar, H. Renting, and M. K. Van Ittersum. 2007. Exploring multi-scale trade-offs between nature conservation, agricultural profits and landscape quality-A methodology to support discussions on land-use perspectives. Agriculture, Ecosystems, & Environment. 120(1): 58–69.
Hansen, A. T., et al. 2021. “Integrated assessment modeling reveals near-channel management as cost-effective to improve water quality in agricultural watersheds.” Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 118 (28): e2024912118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2024912118.
Herr, J., and C. W. Chen. 2006. San Joaquin River Model: Calibration Report. A Deliverable for CALFED Project ERP-02D-P63 Monitoring and Investigations for the San Joaquin River and Tributaries Related to Dissolved Oxygen. Task 6 Model Calibration and Forecasting. San Ramon, CA.
Hood, R. R., et al. 2019. Chesapeake Bay Program Modeling in 2025 and Beyond: A Proactive Visioning Workshop. 62. Edgewater, MD.
Jaffe, M., M. Zellner, E. Minor, M. Gonzalez-Meler, L. B. Cotner, D. Massey, and B. Miller. 2010. The Illinois Green Infrastructure Study. A Report to the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency on Criteria in Section 15 of Public Act 96-0026, The Illinois Green Infrastructure for Clean Water Act of 2009, Chicago, IL.
Jiang, Y., Y. Yuan, and H. Piza. 2015. A review of applicability and effectiveness of low impact development/green infrastructure practices in arid/semi-arid United States. Environments 2(2), 221–249.
Kalcic, M. M., J. Frankenberger, and I. Chaubey. 2015. “Spatial Optimization of Six Conservation Practices Using Swat in Tile-Drained Agricultural Watersheds.” J Am Water Resour Assoc, 51 (4): 956–972. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12338.
Lee, J. G., A. Selvakumar, K. Alvi, J. Riverson, J. X. Zhen, L. Shoemaker, and F. H. Lai. 2012. A watershed-scale design optimization model for stormwater best management practices. Environmental Modelling & Software 37, 6–18.
Li, H. 2015. Green infrastructure for highway stormwater management: Field investigation for future design, maintenance, and management needs. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 21(4), 05015001.
Lintern, A., L. McPhillips, B. Winfrey, J. Duncan, and C. Grady. 2020. “Best Management Practices for Diffuse Nutrient Pollution: Wicked Problems Across Urban and Agricultural Watersheds.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 54 (15): 9159–9174. American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b07511.
Liu, Y., B. A. Engel, D. C. Flanagan, M. W. Gitau, S. K. McMillan, I. Chaubey, and S. Singh. 2018. “Modeling framework for representing long-term effectiveness of best management practices in addressing hydrology and water quality problems: Framework development and demonstration using a Bayesian method.” Journal of Hydrology, 560: 530–545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.03.053.
Macro, K., L. S. Matott, A. Rabideau, S. H. Ghodsi, and Z. Zhu. 2019. OSTRICH-SWMM: A new multi-objective optimization tool for green infrastructure planning with SWMM. Environmental Modelling & Software 113, 42–47.
Meerow, S., M. Natarajan, and D. Krantz. 2021. Green infrastructure performance in arid and semi-arid urban environments. Urban Water Journal 18(4), 275–285.
Mohamoud, Y. M., R. Parmar, and K. Wolfe. 2010. “Modeling Best Management Practices (BMPs) with HSPF.” Watershed Management 2010, 892–898. Madison, Wisconsin, United States: American Society of Civil Engineers.
Montalto, F. C., C. Behr, K. Alfredo, M. Wolf, M. Arye, and M. Walsh. 2007. Rapid assessment of the cost-effectiveness of low impact development for CSO control. Landscape and Urban Planning, 82(3), 117–131.
Piemonti, A. D., M. Babbar-Sebens, and E. J. Luzar. 2013. Optimizing conservation practices in watersheds: Do community preferences matter? Water Resources Research, 49: 1–25.
Quinn, N. W. T., and W. M. Hanna. 2003. A decision support system for adaptive real-time management of seasonal wetlands in California. Environmental Modelling and Software, Volume 18, Issue 6, pp. 503–511.
Quinn, N. W. T., and J. Karkoski. 1998. Real-time management of water quality in the San Joaquin River Basin, California. American Water Resources Association, Vol. 34, No. 6.
Quinn, N. W. T. 2011. Adaptive implementation of information technology for real-time, basin-scale salinity management in the San Joaquin Basin, USA and Hunter River Basin, Australia. Agricultural Water Management, 98(6):930–940.
Quinn, N. W. T. 2020. Policy innovation and governance for irrigation sustainability in the arid, saline San Joaquin River Basin, Sustainability, 12(11):4733, https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114733.
Reed, M. 2008. Stakeholder participation for environmental management: a literature review. Biological Conservation 141 (10), 2417–2431.
Rossman, L. A. 2015. Storm Water Management Model User’s manual version 5.1. National Risk Management Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.
Rossman, L. A., and W. C. Huber. 2016. Storm Water Management Model reference manual Volume III – Water quality. National Risk Management Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.
Sage, J., E. Berthier, and M.-C. Gromaire. 2015. Stormwater management criteria for onsite pollution control: A comparative assessment of international practices. Environmental Management, 56, 66–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-015-0485-1.
Sharma, R., and P. Malaviya. 2021. Management of stormwater pollution using green infrastructure: The role of rain gardens. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water 8(2), e1507.
Shojaeizadeh, A., M. Geza, and T. S. Hogue. 2021. GIP-SWMM: A new green infrastructure placement tool coupled with SWMM. Journal of Environmental Management 277, 111409.
Sohn, W., J.-H. Kim, M.-H. Li, and R. Brown. 2019. “The influence of climate on the effectiveness of low impact development: A systematic review.” Journal of Environmental Management, 236: 365–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.11.041.
Srivastava, P., J. M. Hamett, P. D. Robillard, and R. L. Day. 2002. Watershed optimization of best management practices using AnnAGNPS and a genetic algorithm Water Resources Research, 38(3), 14 pp.
Tomer, M. D., and M. A. Locke. 2011. “The challenge of documenting water quality benefits of conservation practices: a review of USDA-ARS’s conservation effects assessment project watershed studies.” Water Science and Technology, 64 (1): 300–310. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2011.555.
USEPA. 2007. Total Maximum Daily Loads with Stormwater Sources: A Summary of 17 TMDLs. Available at https://www.epa.gov/tmdl/total-maximum-daily-loads-stormwater-sources-summary-17-tmdls.
USEPA. 2022a. Integrated Planning in Action - Determining Requirements and Drivers. Available at https://www.epa.gov/npdes/integrated-planning-municipal-stormwater-and-wastewater.
USEPA. 2022b. Green Infrastructure Modeling Toolkit. Available at https://www.epa.gov/water-research/green-infrastructure-modeling-toolkit (Last Updated on February 25, 2022).
USGS. 2019. iRIC river flow and riverbed variation analysis. Available at https://www.usgs.gov/software/iric-river-flow-and-riverbed-variation-analysis.
van Wenum, J. H., G. A. A. Wossink, and J. A. Renkema. 2004. Location-specific modeling for optimizing wildlife management on crop farms. Ecological Economics 48, 395–407.
Vitousek, P. M., J. D. Aber, R. W. Howarth, G. E. Likens, P. A. Matson, D. W. Schindler, W. H. Schlesinger, and D. G. Tilman. 1997. “Human Alteration of the Global Nitrogen Cycle: Sources and Consequences.” Ecological Applications, 7 (3): 737–750. https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(1997)007[0737:HAOTGN]2.0.CO;2.
Walters, C. J., and R. Hilborn. 1978. Ecological optimization and adaptive management. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 9, 157–188.
Wilensky, U. 1999. Netlogo [computer software]. Center for connected learning and computer-based modeling, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL (Retrieved from http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/).
Wossink, A., J. van Wenum, C. Jurgens, and G. de Snoo. 1999. Co-ordinating economic, behavioural and spatial aspects of wildlife preservation in agriculture. European Review of Agricultural Economic, 26(4): 443–460.
WRF (The Water Research Foundation). 2020. International Stormwater BMP Database: 2020 Summary Statistics. Available at https://www.waterrf.org/system/files/resource/2020-11/DRPT-4968_0.pdf.
WRF (The Water Research Foundation). 2021. “Community-enabled Lifecycle Analysis of Stormwater Infrastructure Costs (CLASIC).” Available at https://waterrf.org/clasic and https://clasic.erams.com/.
Yang, Y., T. A. Endreny, and D. J. D. J. Nowak. 2015. Simulating the effect of flow path roughness to examine how green infrastructure restores urban runoff timing and magnitude. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 14(2), 361–367.
Young, K. D. 2006. Application of the analytic hierarchy process optimization algorithm in best management practice selection. Doctoral dissertation, Virginia Tech. Blacksburg, VA.
Young, K. D., D. F. Kibler, B. L. Benham, and G. V. Loganathan. 2009. Application of the analytical hierarchical process for improved selection of storm-water BMPs. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 135(4), 264–275.
Zellner, M., D. Massey, E. Minor, and M. Gonzalez-Meler. 2016. “Exploring the Effects of Green Infrastructure Placement on Neighborhood-Level Flooding via Spatially Explicit Simulations.” Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 59(2016): 116–128.
Zhang, H. X. 2012. Linking TMDL Development with Implementation using Watershed Modeling Tools: Successful Applications and Future Challenges. Proceeding of World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2012: Crossing Boundaries. Edited by E. D. Loucks. Page 3887–3893. Available at https://ascelibrary.org/doi/book/10.1061/9780784412312.
Zhang, H. X., and K. Albertin. 2012. Linking Explicit Modeling of 'Green Scenarios’ With Watershed-Scale Evaluation and Receiving Water Quality Impacts: A Review. Proceeding of 2012 Annual Conference by American Water Resources Association (November 12-15, 2012; Jacksonville, Florida).
Zhang, H. X., S. Sharvelle, T. Dell, J. Egan, J. Cotting, T. Bronleewe, C. Pomeroy, M. Arabi, J. Clary, M. Leisenring, J. Clements, and B. Liner. 2021. “Advancing Holistic Stormwater Management through CLASIC”. Advances in Water Research. Volume 31, Number 4. (October – December 2021). Available at: https://www.advancesinwaterresearch.org/awr/library/item/20211012/3971529/.
Zhang, K., and T. F. M. Chui. 2018. A comprehensive review of spatial allocation of LID-BMP-GI practices: Strategies and optimization tools, Sci. Total Environ., 621, 915–929.
Zhang, K., and T. F. M. Chui. 2019. A review on implementing infiltration-based green infrastructure in shallow groundwater environments: Challenges, approaches, and progress. Journal of Hydrology 579, 124089.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2023
World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2023
Pages: 1298 - 1312

History

Published online: May 18, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Deva K. Borah [email protected]
1Senior Engineer, Dept. of Public Works, City of Chesapeake, Chesapeake, VA. Email: [email protected]
Harry Zhang [email protected]
2Research Program Manager on Integrated Water and Stormwater, Water Research Foundation, Alexandria, VA. Email: [email protected]
Moira Zellner [email protected]
3Professor, Northeastern Univ., Boston, MA. Email: [email protected]
Ebrahim Ahmadisharaf [email protected]
4Assistant Research Professor, Florida State Univ., Tallahassee, FL. Email: [email protected]
Meghna Babbar-Sebens [email protected]
5Associate Professor, Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, OR. Email: [email protected]
Nigel Quinn [email protected]
6Research Group Leader, Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA. Email: [email protected]
Saurav Kumar [email protected]
7Assistant Professor, Arizona State Univ., Tempe, AZ. Email: [email protected]
Navaratnam Leelaruban [email protected]
8Water Resources Engineer, HNTB Corporation, Cherry Hill, NJ. Email: [email protected]
9Virginia Dept. of Environmental Quality, Richmond, VA. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$236.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$236.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share