Chapter
Mar 23, 2023

Seismic Bearing Capacity of an Embedded Strip Footing on Slope Using Modified Pseudo-Dynamic Method

Publication: Geo-Congress 2023

ABSTRACT

By combining the modified pseudo-dynamic method with the lower bound finite element limit analysis technique, the bearing capacity of an embedded strip footing placed on a soil slope and under seismic loading is estimated. A series of parametric studies by varying coefficients of seismic acceleration, friction angle of soil, inclination of the slope, embedded depth of footing, and soil damping ratio is carried out. Obtained results are shown as the variation between the bearing capacity factor and considered parameters. It is found that with the increasing footing embedment, seismic bearing capacity increases considerably. The range of increment in the seismic bearing capacity of an embedded footing varies from seven to ten times that of no embedment. However, irrespective of footing embedment depth, the bearing capacity of footing reduces with increasing values of seismic acceleration coefficients. When both the horizontal and vertical seismic acceleration coefficients are considered together, seismic bearing capacity reduces more. However, it is also found that the footing bearing capacity is higher for soil with a higher damping ratio than that of the footing on a soil with a lower damping ratio. With increasing friction angle of soil, footing bearing capacity increases, but reduces with increasing slope inclination. State of stresses throughout the problem domain are plotted in the two-dimensional axes to understand the failure mechanism of slope under pseudo-dynamic loading. Results obtained from the study will be useful to the design engineers.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.

REFERENCES

Askari, F., and Farzaneh, O. (2003). “Upper-bound solution for seismic bearing capacity of shallow foundations near slopes.” Geotechnique, 53(8), 697–702.
Bellezza, I. (2014). “A new pseudo-dynamic approach for seismic active soil thrust.” Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 32(2), 561–576.
Casablanca, O., Biondi, G., Cascone, E., and Filippo, G. D. (2021). “Static and seismic bearing capacity of shallow strip foundations on slopes.” Geotechnique, 1–15.
Chakraborty, D., and Choudhury, D. (2014). “Sliding stability of non-vertical waterfront retaining wall supporting inclined backfill subjected to pseudo-dynamic earthquake forces.” Applied Ocean Research, 47, 174–182.
Chakraborty, D., and Kumar, J. (2015). “Seismic bearing capacity of shallow embedded foundations on a sloping ground surface.” International Journal of Geomechanics, 15(1), 04014035.
Drescher, A., and Detournay, E. (1993). “Limit load in translational failure mechanisms for associative and non-associative materials.” Geotechnique, 43(3), 443–456.
Ghosh, P. (2008). “Upper bound solutions of bearing capacity of strip footing by pseudo-dynamic approach.” Acta Geotechnica, 3(2), 115–123.
Ghosh, P., and Choudhury, D. (2011). “Seismic bearing capacity factors for shallow strip footings by pseudo-dynamic approach.” Disaster Advances, 4(3), 34–42.
Halder, K., Chakraborty, D., and Dash, S. K. (2018). “Seismic bearing capacity of a strip footing situated on soil slope using a non-associated flow rule in lower bound limit analysis.” In Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics V: Numerical Modeling and Soil Structure Interaction Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers, 454–463.
Halder, K., and Chakraborty, D. (2022). “Estimation of seismic active earth pressure on reinforced retaining wall using lower bound limit analysis and modified pseudo-dynamic method.” Geotextiles and Geomembranes. (Accepted In Press).
Izadi, A., Foroutan Kalourazi, A., and Jamshidi Chenari, R. (2021). “Effect of roughness on seismic bearing capacity of shallow foundations near slopes using the lower bound finite element method.” International Journal of Geomechanics, 21(3), 06020043.
Kumar, J., and Mohan Rao, V. B. K. (2003). “Seismic bearing capacity of foundations on slopes.” Geotechnique, 53(3), 347–361.
Makrodimopoulos, A., and Martin, C. (2006). “Lower bound limit analysis of cohesive‐frictional materials using second‐order cone programming.” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 66(4), 604–634.
Nadgouda, K., and Choudhury, D. (2021). “Seismic bearing capacity factor Nγe for dry sand beneath strip footing using modified pseudo-dynamic method with composite failure surface.” International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 15(2), 171–180.
Pain, A., Choudhury, D., and Bhattacharyya, S. K. (2015). “Seismic stability of retaining wall–soil sliding interaction using modified pseudo-dynamic method.” Geotechnique Letters, 5(1), 56–61.
Sloan, S. W. (1988). “Lower bound limit analysis using finite elements and linear programming.” International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 12(1), 61–77.
Steedman, R. S., and Zeng, X. (1990). “The influence of phase on the calculation of pseudo-static earth pressure on a retaining wall.” Geotechnique, 40(1), 103–112.
Yang, S., Leshchinsky, B., Cui, K., Zhang, F., and Gao, Y. (2021). “Influence of failure mechanism on seismic bearing capacity factors for shallow foundations near slopes.” Geotechnique, 71(7), 594–607.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Geo-Congress 2023
Geo-Congress 2023
Pages: 614 - 622

History

Published online: Mar 23, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

K. Halder, Ph.D. [email protected]
1Research Fellow, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Nottingham, UK. Email: [email protected]
D. Chakraborty, Ph.D. [email protected]
2Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur, India. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$126.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$126.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share