Chapter
Mar 23, 2023

Evaluating the Effects of Asperity Height on Shear Strength of Cohesive Soil-Structure Interface Subjected to Monotonic and Cyclic Axial Loading

Publication: Geo-Congress 2023

ABSTRACT

The load-carrying capacity of geotechnical systems (e.g., foundations supporting offshore wind turbines) subjected to static and/or cyclic axial loading could be enhanced using engineered or idealized textured surfaces (or surface elements). The use of surface elements may allow for the development of passive wedges during axial loading, which result in an additional interface resistance to the total load-carrying capacity. To investigate the effects of surface pattern and asperity height on the static and post-cyclic interface shear response, the cyclic interface shear test (CIST) device, which was developed by the research team, was used. To achieve this, a smooth plate representing the surface condition of commonly used steel piles and four engineered textured plates (i.e., rough plates) of different level of roughness (i.e., asperity height of 0.35, 0.65, 1.25, and 1.75 mm) were 3D printed, and then the soil-plate interface was subjected to monotonic and cyclic axial loading. The interface shear tests were performed in a normally consolidated sand-kaolinite mixture. In this paper, the experimental setup (i.e., CIST), sample preparation, and results of a series of static and displacement-controlled cyclic interface shear tests on smooth and textured (rough) plates are summarized and compared to the static and post-cyclic soil-smooth shear strength (no surface elements). For static tests, the interface shear strength increased with asperity height, and this increase ranged from ~55% to 105% of the soil-smooth interface shear strength. Similarly, the post-cyclic interface shear strength increased with asperity height, and this increase ranged from ~167% to 266% of the soil-smooth interface shear strength. The preliminary test results included in this paper also show that the interface shear resistance of surfaces with structured elements is controlled by asperity height (h) and asperity spacing to height ratio (Sc/h ratio).

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.

REFERENCES

Abu Qamar, M. I., and M. T. Suleiman. 2021. “Evaluating Effects of Cyclic Axial Loading on Soil-Pile Interface Properties Utilizing a Recently Developed Cyclic Interface Shear Test Device.” IFCEE 2021, 366–376. Dallas, Texas: American Society of Civil Engineers.
Abu Qamar, M. I., and M. T. Suleiman. 2022a. “Development of Cyclic Interface Shear Test Device and Testing Procedure to Measure the Response of Cohesive Soil-Structure Interface.” Submitt. ASTM Int. – Geotech. Test. J. Possible Publ.
Abu Qamar, M. I., and M. T. Suleiman. 2022b. “Evaluating the Influence of Surface Roughness on Interface Shear Strength of Cohesive Soil-Structure Interface Subjected to Axial Monotonic Loading.” Geo-Congr. 2022, 281–291. Charlotte, North Carolina: American Society of Civil Engineers.
Abu Qamar, M. I., and M. T. Suleiman. 2022c. “Evaluating the Influence of Surface Roughness on Interface Shear Strength of Cohesive Soil-Structure Interface Subjected to Axial Monotonic Loading.” Geo-Congr. 2022, 281–291. Charlotte, North Carolina: American Society of Civil Engineers.
Alyounis, M. E., and C. S. Desai. 2019. “Testing and Modeling of Saturated Interfaces with Effect of Surface Roughness. I: Test Behavior.” Int. J. Geomech., 19 (8): 04019096. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001459.
Dove, J. E., J. D. Frost, J. Han, and R. C. Bachus. 1997. The influence of geomembrane surface roughness on interface strength. 863–876.
Dove, J. E., and J. B. Jarrett. 2002. “Behavior of Dilative Sand Interfaces in a Geotribology Framework.” J. Geotech. Geoenvironmental Eng., 128 (1): 25–37. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2002)128:1(25).
Fakharian, K., and E. Evgin. 1996. “An Automated Apparatus for Three-Dimensional Monotonic and Cyclic Testing of Interfaces.” Geotech. Test. J., 19 (1): 22. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ11404J.
Frost, J., and J. Dejong. 2005. “In Situ Assessment of Role of Surface Roughness on Interface Response.” J. Geotech. Geoenvironmental Eng. - J Geotech Geoenviron Eng, 131. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:4(498).
Han, F., E. Ganju, R. Salgado, and M. Prezzi. 2018. “Effects of Interface Roughness, Particle Geometry, and Gradation on the Sand–Steel Interface Friction Angle.” J. Geotech. Geoenvironmental Eng., 144 (12): 04018096. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001990.
Hebeler, G. L., A. Martinez, and J. D. Frost. 2015. “Shear zone evolution of granular soils in contact with conventional and textured CPT friction sleeves.” KSCE J. Civ. Eng., 20 (4): 1267–1282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-015-0767-6.
Hryciw, R. D., and M. Irsyam. 1993. “Behavior of Sand Particles Around Rigid Ribbed Inclusions During Shear.” Soils Found., 33 (3): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.33.3_1.
Huang, L., and A. Martinez. 2021. “Load Transfer Anisotropy at Snakeskin-Inspired Clay-Structure Interfaces.” IFCEE 2021, 119–129. Dallas, Texas: American Society of Civil Engineers.
Irsyam, M., and R. D. Hryciw. 1991. Friction and passive resistance in soil reinforced by plane ribbed inclusions. 14.
Kishida, H., and M. Uesugi. 1987. Tests of the interface between sand and steel in the simple shear apparatus. 8.
Lings, M. L., and M. S. Dietz. 2005. “The Peak Strength of Sand-Steel Interfaces and the Role of Dilation.” Soils Found., 45 (6): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.45.1.
Martinez, A., and J. D. Frost. 2017. “The influence of surface roughness form on the strength of sand–structure interfaces.” Géotechnique Lett., 7 (1): 104–111. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgele.16.00169.
Martinez, A., J. Frost, and G. Hebeler. 2015. “Experimental Study of Shear Zones Formed at Sand/Steel Interfaces in Axial and Torsional Axisymmetric Tests.” Geotech. Test. J., 38: 20140266. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ20140266.
Martinez, A., and H. H. Stutz. 2019. “Rate effects on the interface shear behaviour of normally and overconsolidated clay.” Géotechnique, 69 (9): 801–815. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.17.P.311.
O’Hara, K. B., and A. Martinez. 2020. “Monotonic and Cyclic Frictional Resistance Directionality in Snakeskin-Inspired Surfaces and Piles.” J. Geotech. Geoenvironmental Eng., 146 (11): 04020116. American Society of Civil Engineers. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002368.
Subba Rao, K. S., K. S. S. Rao, M. M. Allam, and R. G. Robinson. 1998. “Interfacial friction between sands and solid surfaces.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. - Geotech. Eng., 131 (2): 75–82. https://doi.org/10.1680/igeng.1998.30112.
Wang, X., H. Cheng, P. Yan, J. Zhang, and Y. Ding. 2021. “The influence of roughness on cyclic and post-cyclic shear behavior of red clay-concrete interface subjected to up to 1000 cycles.” Constr. Build. Mater., 273: 121718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121718.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Geo-Congress 2023
Geo-Congress 2023
Pages: 270 - 280

History

Published online: Mar 23, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Mu’ath I. Abu Qamar, A.M.ASCE [email protected]
1Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Yarmouk Univ., Irbid, Jordan. Email: [email protected]
Muhannad T. Suleiman, Ph.D., M.ASCE [email protected]
2Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Lehigh Univ., Bethlehem, PA. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$126.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$126.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share