Experimental Evaluation of Stress Path of Weak Foundation Soil Reinforced with Recycled Plastic Pins
Publication: Geo-Congress 2023
ABSTRACT
With the advancement of civilization, building structures on weak foundation soil has become essential nowadays. When structures are built on weak foundation soil, they are subjected to bearing failure and excessive settlement. Most of the conventional ground improvement techniques are expensive, and they use virgin materials. The use of recycled plastic pins (RPPs) is a low-cost solution that can reduce the environmental effect of using virgin material and enhance sustainable waste management systems. The objective of this study is to quantify the increase of the strength behavior of weak foundation soil reinforced by RPPs. RPPs having two different cross-sections (100 mm × 100 mm, and 150 mm × 150 mm) were installed in the field at different spacings. Since RPPs were driven into the soil, the surrounding in situ soil got displaced and compacted. Dynamic cone penetrometer (DCP) and soil penetrometer were used to evaluate the material properties of the in situ soil. The strength properties of the improved soil were determined by laboratory investigation and also using the correlation between the shear strength of soil and dynamic cone penetration index. It was observed that the shear strength of the reinforced soil increased significantly compared to that of the unreinforced soil due to particle densification. This indicates an upward shift of the failure line of the reinforced soil. On the other hand, being stiffer material, RPPs carried a higher load, and the soil between RPPs was subjected to less stress due to soil arching action. Therefore, the stress paths shift downward, and the factor of safety of the reinforced ground against failure increases.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.
REFERENCES
Alshkane, Y. M., Rashed, K. A., and Daoud, H. S. (2020). “Unconfined compressive strength (UCS) and compressibility indices predictions from dynamic cone penetrometer index (DCP) for cohesive soil.” Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 38(4), 3683–3695.
Badhon, F. F. (2021). Performance of Recycled Plastic Pins for Increasing Bearing Capacity of Foundation Soil, Doctoral dissertation, The University of Texas at Arlington.
Badhon, F. F., Bhandari, P., Islam, M. A., and Hossain, M. S. (2022). “Comparison between Field Study and Numerical Analysis Results for Recycled Plastic Pin (RPP) Reinforced Foundation System.” In Geo-Congress 2022 (pp. 426–435).
Badhon, F. F., Zaman, M. N. B., Bhandari, P., Islam, M. A., and Hossain, M. S. (2021). “Performance of Recycled Plastic Pins for Improving the Bearing Capacity of MSE Wall Foundation.” In IFCEE 2021 (pp. 521–529).
Bhandari, P., Hossain, M. S., Islam, M. A., and Badhon, F. F. (2022). “Controlling base movement of MSE walls using recycled plastic pins.” Transportation Geotechnics, 32, 100707.
Breslin, V. T., Senturk, U., and Berndt, C. C. (1998). “Long-term engineering properties of recycled plastic lumber in pier construction.” Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 23(4), 243–258.
Chen, C. W., Salim, H., Bowders, J., Loehr, E., and Owen, J. (2007). “Creep behavior of recycled plastic lumber in slope stabilization applications.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng., https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2007)19:2(130), 130–138.
Embacher, R. A. (2006). “Duration of Spring Thaw Recovery for Aggregate-Surfaced Roads.” Transportation Research Record, 1967(1), 27–35.
Islam, M. A. (2021). Effectiveness of Recycled Plastic Pin for Improving Bearing Capacity of Embankment over Soft Soil, Doctoral dissertation, The University of Texas at Arlington.
Islam, M. A., Hossain, M. S., Badhon, F. F., and Bhandari, P. (2021). “Performance Evaluation of Recycled-Plastic-Pin-Supported Embankment over Soft Soil.” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 147(6), 04021032.
Loehr, J. E., Bowders, J. J., Owen, J. W., Sommers, L., and Liew, W. (2000). “Stabilization of slopes using recycled plastic pins.” Transportation Research Record, 1714, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 1–8.
McElvaney, J., and Bundadidjatnika, I. (1991). “Strength evaluation of lime-stabilised pavement foundations using the dynamic cone penetrometer.” Aust Road Res 21(1):1.
McLaren, M. G. (1995). “Recycled plastic lumber and shapes design and specification.” Proc., 13th Structures Congress, Vol. 1, ASCE, Reston, VA, 819–833.
Patel, M. A., and Patel, H. S. (2012). “Experimental Study to Correlate the Test Results of PBT, UCS, and CBR with Liquid Limit, Gradation and DCP Results On Various Soils in Soaked Condition.” International Journal of Engineering (IJE), 6(5), 244–261.
Patel, M. A., Patel, H., and Dadhich, G. (2013). “Prediction of subgrade strength parameters from dynamic cone penetrometer index.” Procedia-Soc Behav Sci 104, 245–254.
Sakib, S., Islam, M. A., and Hossain, M. S. (2022). “Assessment of the Seasonal and Spatial Variation in Shear Strength of High Plasticity Clay on Highway Slopes Using DCP Tests.” In Geo-Congress 2022, 524–533.
Scala, A. J. (1956). “Simple Methods of Flexible Pavement Design Using Cone Penetrometers.” New Zealand Engineering, 11(2), 34–44.
White, D. J., Vennapusa, P. K., Gieselman, H., Johanson, L., and Siekmeier, J. (2009). “Alternatives to heavy test rolling for cohesive subgrade assessment.” In: Paper presented at the Bearing Capacity of Roads, Railways and Airfields. 8th International Conference (BCR2A’09).
Sommers, L., Loehr, J. E., and Bowders, J. J. (2000). “Construction methods for slope stabilization with recycled plastic pins.” Proc., Mid-Continent Transportation Symp., Iowa State Univ.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
History
Published online: Mar 23, 2023
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.