Insights into Seismic Deformation Patterns for Shallow and Deep Sliding Masses Using Finite Element Analysis
Publication: Geo-Congress 2023
ABSTRACT
Earthquake-induced slope displacements are typically estimated using a sliding block analysis. Sliding block approaches, for both rigid and flexible sliding masses, have been shown to roughly capture the observed seismic performance of slopes during previous earthquakes. However, these approaches incorporate simplifying assumptions that do not represent the full dynamic response of a slope. Two-dimensional (2D), nonlinear, total stress finite-element analyses were performed to identify the seismic deformation patterns for shallow (friction-dominated) and deeper (cohesion-dominated) critical sliding masses. The numerical parametric analyses consisted of four models with soil stiffness and strength parameters selected to isolate the impact of the slope seismic resistance (i.e., ky) and the depth of the slip surface on seismic slope deformation patterns. Each model was analyzed in the context of how the ground motion intensity (in terms of peak ground velocity, PGV) affects the maximum permanent displacement along the surface of the slope, the profiles of permanent displacement and shear strain, and the stress-strain behavior at different depths. The results indicate that for the same ky and same Tslope, the displacement is significantly affected by the depth of the critical sliding mass due to the distribution of static shear stress and soil’s shear strength along with the slope height. For the conditions considered, at small ky the deeper sliding masses experience larger displacements due to the presence of localized straining at depth. Their slope displacements are about 1.2–2 times greater than their counterparts with shallow sliding surfaces, particularly when the PGV is greater than 20 cm/s. At large ky, shallow sliding masses experience more distributed straining across the entire sliding mass depth (and hence slope displacements), leading to displacements about 1.25–2 times larger than the deep sliding mass models. These insights point to the importance of considering more advanced numerical simulations (as opposed to traditional sliding block analysis) when quantifying the seismic performance of a slope.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.
REFERENCES
Bray, J. D., and T. Travasarou. 2007. “Simplified procedure for estimating earthquake-induced deviatoric slope displacements.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 133 (4): 381–392. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2007)133:4(381).
Bray, J. D., and J. Macedo. 2019. “Procedure for estimating shear-induced seismic slope displacement for shallow crustal earthquakes.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 145 (12):04019106. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002143.
Cho, Y., and E. M. Rathje. 2022. Generic Predictive Model of Earthquake-Induced Slope Displacements Derived from Finite-Element Analysis. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 148(4), p.04022010.
Duncan, J. M., and S. G. Wright. 1980. The accuracy of equilibrium methods of slope stability analysis. Engineering geology, 16(1-2), pp.5–17.
Darendeli, M. B. 2001. Development of a new family of normalized modulus reduction and material damping curves. Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. of Texas.
Fotopoulou, S. D., and K. D. Pitilakis. 2015. “Predictive relationships for seismically induced slope displacements using numerical analysis results.” Bull. Earthquake Eng. 13 (11): 3207–3238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-015-9768-4.
Groholski, D. R., Y. M. Hashash, B. Kim, M. Musgrove, J. Harmon, and J. P. Stewart. 2016. Simplified model for small-strain nonlinearity and strength in 1D seismic site response analysis. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 142(9), p.04016042.
Hashash, Y. M. A., M. I. Musgrove, J. A. Harmon, O. Ilhan, G. Xing, O. Numanoglu, D. R. Groholski, C. A. Phillips, and D. Park. 2020. DEEPSOIL 7, user manual. Urbana, IL: Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Janbu, N., 1954. Application of composite slip surface for stability analysis. In Proceedings of European Conference on Stability of Earth Slopes, Sweden, 1954 (Vol. 3, pp. 43–49).
Lysmer, J., and A. Kuhlemeyer. 1969. “Finite dynamic model for infinite media.” J. Eng. Mech. Div. 95 (4): 859–877. https://doi.org/10.1061/JMCEA3.0001144.
McKenna, F. 1997. Object-oriented finite element programming: Frameworks for analysis, algorithms and parallel computing. Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of California–Berkeley.
McGann, C., P. Arduino, and P. Mackenzie-Helnwein. 2012. “Stabilized single-point 4-node quadrilateral element for dynamic analysis of fluid saturated porous media.” Acta Geotech. 7 (4): 297–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-012-0168-5.
Makdisi, F. I., and H. B. Seed. 1978. “Simplified procedure for estimating dam and embankment earthquake induced deformations.” J. Geotech. Eng. Div. 104 (7): 849–867. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJGEB6.0000668.
Newmark, N. M. 1965. “Effects of earthquakes on dams and embankments.” Géotechnique 15 (2): 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1965.15.2.139.
Rathje, E. M., et al. 2017. “DesignSafe: A new cyberinfrastructure for natural hazards engineering.” Nat. Hazards Rev. 18 (3): 06017001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000246.
Rathje, E. M., and G. Antonakos. 2011. “A unified model for predicting earthquake-induced sliding displacements of rigid and flexible slopes.”Eng. Geol. 122 (1): 51–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2010.12.004.
Rathje, E. M., and J. D. Bray. 1999. “An examination of simplified earthquake-induced displacement procedures for earth structures.” Can. Geotech. J. 36 (1): 72–87. https://doi.org/10.1139/t98-076.
Rathje, E. M., and J. D. Bray. 2000. “Nonlinear coupled seismic sliding analysis of earth structures.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 126 (11):1002–1014. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2000)126:11(1002).
Saygili, G., and E. M. Rathje. 2008. “Empirical predictive models for earthquake-induced sliding displacements of slopes.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 134 (6): 790–803. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2008)134:6(790).
Song, J., Y. Gao, T. Feng, and G. Xu. 2018. “Effect of site condition below slip surface on prediction of equivalent seismic loading parameters and sliding displacement.” Eng. Geol. 242 (Aug): 169–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.05.003.
Yang, Z., J. Lu, and A. Elgamal. 2008. OpenSees soil models and solid-fluid fully coupled elements user’s manual.
Zhang, Y., J. P. Conte, Z. Yang, A. Elgamal, J. Bielak, and G. Acero. 2008. Two-dimensional nonlinear earthquake response analysis of a bridge-foundation-ground system. Earthquake Spectra, 24(2), pp.343–386.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
History
Published online: Mar 23, 2023
ASCE Technical Topics:
- Continuum mechanics
- Deformation (mechanics)
- Displacement (mechanics)
- Earthquake engineering
- Engineering fundamentals
- Engineering mechanics
- Finite element method
- Geohazards
- Geomechanics
- Geotechnical engineering
- Landslides
- Methodology (by type)
- Numerical methods
- Seismic effects
- Seismic tests
- Sliding effects
- Slopes
- Soil mechanics
- Soil properties
- Soil strength
- Solid mechanics
- Structural mechanics
- Tests (by type)
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.