Influence of Pipe Wall Thickness on the Response of Buried Pipelines Subjected to Earthquake Faulting
Publication: Geo-Congress 2023
ABSTRACT
Permanent ground deformation induced by seismic faulting is a severe hazard for buried transmission pipelines. Over the years, many studies have attempted to investigate the factors that influence the performance of buried pipelines subjected to earthquake faulting. Some of the influential factors are normalized pipe thickness with pipe diameter (t/D), normalized burial depth with pipe diameter (H/D), fault offset rate, soil density, and soil moisture content. A better understanding of the effect of these factors or discovering new influential factors can lead to a more appropriate design of buried pipelines in the future. This study presents results from a series of experimental tests designed to investigate the influence of pipe thickness on pipe behavior while the outer pipe diameter remains constant. In contrast to previous studies that investigated the t/D factor by changing both pipe diameter and pipe thickness, this experimental research explores the independent effect of pipe thickness on soil-pipe interaction. The experimental tests were carried out in a split-box apparatus modeling the reverse faulting under 1 g conditions. Two copper pipes with thicknesses of 0.7 and 1.0 mm and the same outer diameter of 15 mm were used as the model pipes. A scaling factor n = 25 was used for the model pipes to represent a 600 mm diameter API 5L prototype steel pipe with wall thicknesses of 6.35 mm and 9.53 mm, respectively. The model pipes were buried in a medium dense sandy layer and subjected to 180 mm reverse fault offset. The results show that the thickness of the pipe has a significant effect on the maximum bending strain generated along the pipe. For the thinner pipe, it was shown that the required fault offset for buckling the pipe is about 30% less than the thicker pipe, indicating a safer response for pipes with a larger thickness value.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.
REFERENCES
Abdoun, T. H., D. Ha, M. J. O’Rourke, M. D. Symans, T. D. O’Rourke, M. C. Palmer, and H. E. Stewart. 2009. 'Factors influencing the behavior of buried pipelines subjected to earthquake faulting', Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 29: 415–27.
ALA. 2001. Guidelines for the design of buried steel pipe. Guidelines for the Design of Buried Steel Pipe.
API. 2008. Specification 5L. Specification for Line Pipe.
Argyrou, C., T. D. O’Rourke, C. Pariya-Ekkasut, and H. E. Stewart. 2020. 'Ductile iron pipeline response to earthquake-induced ground rupture', Earthquake Spectra, 36: 832–55.
ASCE. 1984. 'Guidelines for the seismic design of oil and gas pipeline systems', Guidelines for the Seismic Design of Oil and Gas Pipeline Systems, Committee on Gas and Liquid Fuel Lifelines.
AWWA. 2009. Manual 41. Ductile-Iron Pipe and Fittings.
Cheong, T. P., K. Soga, and D. J. Robert. 2011. '3D FE Analyses of Buried Pipeline with Elbows Subjected to Lateral Loading', Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 137: 939–48.
Ha, D., T. H. Abdoun, M. J. O’Rourke, M. D. Symans, T. D. O’Rourke, M. C. Palmer, and H. E. Stewart. 2008. 'Buried high-density polyethylene pipelines subjected to normal and strike-slip faulting - A centrifuge investigation', Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 45: 1733–42.
Karamitros, D. K., G. D. Bouckovalas, and G. P. Kouretzis. 2007. 'Stress analysis of buried steel pipelines at strike-slip fault crossings', Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 27: 200–11.
Kennedy, R. P., A. M. Chow, and R. A. Williamson. 1977. 'Fault Movement Effects On Buried Oil Pipeline', ASCE Transp Eng J, 103: 617–33.
O’Rourke, M. J., and X. Liu. 2012. 'Seismic design of buried and offshore pipelines', Seismic Design of Buried and Offshore Pipelines.
Rostami, H., A. Osouli, B. Vaughn, and H. Touchaei. 2021. ' Influence of Boundary Conditions on Response of Pipelines Crossing Reverse Fault Zone', ASCE Geo-Extreme 2021, Savannah, GA.
Towhata, I. 2008. Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering.
Tsatsis, A., M. Loli, and G. Gazetas. 2019. 'Pipeline in dense sand subjected to tectonic deformation from normal or reverse faulting', Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 127.
Turner, J. E. 2004. Lateral force-displacement behavior of pipes in partially saturated sand.
Van Es, S. H. J., A. M. Gresnigt, D. Vasilikis, and S. A. Karamanos. 2016. “Ultimate bending capacity of spiral-welded steel tubes - Part I: Experiments.” Thin-Walled Structures 102: 286–304.
Vargas, W. M. 1998. Ring shear tests on large deformation of sand, Ph. D. Thesis, The University of Tokyo.
Wang, L. R., and Y.‐H. Yeh. 1985. 'A refined seismic analysis and design of buried pipeline for fault movement', Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 13: 75–96.
Wood, D. M., A. Crewe, and C. Taylor. 2002. 'Shaking table testing of geotechnical models', International Journal of Physical Modelling in Geotechnics, 2: 01–13.
Wroth, C. P. 1979. 'A review of the engineering properties of soils with particular reference to the shear modulus', Univ. of Oxford.
Xie, X., M. D. Symans, M. J. O’Rourke, T. H. Abdoun, T. D. O’Rourke, M. C. Palmer, and H. E. Stewart. 2013. 'Numerical modeling of buried HDPE pipelines subjected to normal faulting: A case study', Earthquake Spectra, 29: 609–32.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
History
Published online: Mar 23, 2023
ASCE Technical Topics:
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.