Chapter
Nov 16, 2022

Seismic Resilience of Intermodal Freight Transportation Networks with Ties to Economic Impact Modeling

ABSTRACT

This study presents a framework to quantify resilience of intermodal freight transportation networks disrupted by seismic events. The framework integrates available seismic fragility and restoration models for infrastructure components, and poses a port operation model along with a network model that couples ports with highways and railways to evaluate freight flow through intermodal transfer nodes, an integration that is currently lacking in existing literature. Emphasis is placed on assessing damage to intermodal systems, functionality evolution for the individual modes, and intermodal freight throughput metrics such as TEUs (twenty-foot equivalent unit). The proposed framework enables loss assessment considering physical and operational disruptions. Furthermore, this work lays a foundation for future integration of the infrastructure resilience model with community scale economic impact models by tracking the class and volume of goods disrupted across the affected region over time. A case study illustrates application of the proposed framework and opportunities for future work leveraging a hypothetical intermodal network consisting of a container seaport connected to roadway and railway networks, exposed to varying levels of scenario seismic hazard events.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.

REFERENCES

Ak, A. (2008). Berth and Quay Sheduling: Problems, Models And Solution Methods. In Doctor of Philosophy Thesis (Issue December).
Ambler, C. A., and Kristoff, J. E. (1998). Introducing the North American industry classification system. Government Information Quarterly, 15(3), 263–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0740-624X(98)90003-X.
Argyroudis, S., and Kaynia, A. M. (2015). Analytical seismic fragility functions for highway and railway embankments and cuts. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 44(11), 1863–1879. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2563.
Attary, N., Cutler, H., Shields, M., and van de Lindt, J. W. (2020). The economic effects of financial relief delays following a natural disaster. Economic Systems Research, 32(3), 351–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2020.1713729.
Boore, D. M., Stewart, J. P., Seyhan, E., and Atkinson, G. M. (2014). NGA-West2 Equations for Predicting PGA, PGV, and 5% Damped PSA for Shallow Crustal Earthquakes. Earthquake Spectra, 30(3), 1057–1085. https://doi.org/10.1193/070113EQS184M.
Burden, L. I. (2012). Forecasting earthquake losses in port systems. In ProQuest Dissertations and Theses (Issue February). https://search.proquest.com/docview/1221581354?accountid=188395.
Burden, L. I., Rix, G., and Werner, S. (2016). Development of a risk framework for forecasting earthquake losses in port systems. Earthquake Spectra, 32(1), 267–284. https://doi.org/10.1193/043013EQS117M.
Cao, X., and Lam, J. S. L. (2018). Simulation-based catastrophe-induced port loss estimation. Reliability Engineering and System Safety. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2018.02.008.
Chang, S. E. (2000). Disasters and transport systems: Loss, recovery and competition at the Port of Kobe after the 1995 earthquake. Journal of Transport Geography, 8(1), 53–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0966-6923(99)00023-X.
Cutler, H., Shields, M., Tavani, D., and Zahran, S. (2016). Integrating engineering outputs from natural disaster models into a dynamic spatial computable general equilibrium model of Centerville. Sustainable and Resilient Infrastructure, 1(3–4), 169–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/23789689.2016.1254996.
Domahidi, A., Chu, E., and Boyd, S. (2013). ECOS: An SOCP solver for embedded systems. 2013 European Control Conference (ECC), 3071–3076. https://doi.org/10.23919/ECC.2013.6669541.
FEMA. (2015). HAZUS-MH 2.1: Technical Manual. National Institute of Building Sciences and Federal Emergency Management Agency (NIBS and FEMA).
Gharehgozli, A. H., Mileski, J., Adams, A., and von Zharen, W. (2017). Evaluating a “wicked problem”: A conceptual framework on seaport resiliency in the event of weather disruptions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 121, 65–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.11.006.
González, A. D., Chapman, A., Dueñas-Osorio, L., Mesbahi, M., and D’Souza, R. M. (2017). Efficient Infrastructure Restoration Strategies Using the Recovery Operator. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 32(12), 991–1006. https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.12314.
González, A. D., Dueñas-Osorio, L., Sánchez-Silva, M., and Medaglia, A. L. (2016). The Interdependent Network Design Problem for Optimal Infrastructure System Restoration. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 31(5), 334–350. https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.12171.
Jacobs, L. D., Kosbab, B. D., Leon, R. T., and DesRoches, R. (2011). Seismic Behavior of a Jumbo Container Crane Including Uplift. Earthquake Spectra, 27(3), 745–773. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.3610238.
Jian, W., Liu, C., and Lam, J. S. L. (2019). Cyclone risk model and assessment for East Asian container ports. Ocean and Coastal Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.04.023.
Kosbab, B. D. (2010). Seismic Performance Evaluation of Port Container Cranes Allowed To Uplift. In Georgia Institute of Technology. https://smartech.gatech.edu/handle/1853/33921.
Miller-Hooks, E., Zhang, X., and Faturechi, R. (2012). Measuring and maximizing resilience of freight transportation networks. Computers & Operations Research, 39(7), 1633–1643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2011.09.017.
Misra, S. (2020). Seismic Resilience of Rail-Truck Intermodal Freight Transportation Networks.
Misra, S., and Padgett, J. E. (2019). Seismic Fragility of Railway Bridge Classes: Methods, Models, and Comparison with the State of the Art. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 24(12), 04019116. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001485.
Misra, S., Padgett, J. E., Barbosa, A. R., and Webb, B. M. (2020). An expert opinion survey on post-hazard restoration of roadways and bridges: Data and key insights. Earthquake Spectra, 875529301989172. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755293019891722.
Na, U. J., and Shinozuka, M. (2009). Simulation-based seismic loss estimation of seaport transportation system. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 94(3), 722–731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2008.07.005.
Nair, R., Avetisyan, H., and Miller-Hooks, E. (2010). Resilience Framework for Ports and Other Intermodal Components. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2166(1), 54–65. https://doi.org/10.3141/2166-07.
Nielson, B. G., and DesRoches, R. (2007). Analytical Seismic Fragility Curves for Typical Bridges in the Central and Southeastern United States. Earthquake Spectra, 23(3), 615–633. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2756815.
Pachakis, D., and Kiremidjian, A. S. (2004). Estimation of Downtime-Related Revenue Losses in Seaports following Scenario Earthquakes. Earthquake Spectra, 20(2), 427–449. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1705655.
Rodriguez-Molins, M., Salido, M. A., and Barber, F. (2012). Intelligent planning for allocating containers in maritime terminals. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(1), 978–989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.07.098.
Schütt, H. (2011). Handbook of Terminal Planning. In J. W. Böse (Ed.), Operations Research/ Computer Science Interfaces Series (Vol. 49, Issue 1). Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8408-1.
Shafieezadeh, A., and Ivey Burden, L. (2014). Scenario-based resilience assessment framework for critical infrastructure systems: Case study for seismic resilience of seaports. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 132, 207–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2014.07.021.
Wakeman, T. H. (2013). Lessons from Hurricane Sandy for Port Resilience (Issue December). http://www.utrc2.org/sites/default/files/pubs/Final-Hurricane-Sandy-Resilience_0.pdf.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Lifelines 2022
Lifelines 2022
Pages: 372 - 383

History

Published online: Nov 16, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Anibal Tafur [email protected]
1Graduate Student, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Rice Univ., Houston, TX. Email: [email protected]
Jamie E. Padgett, Ph.D. [email protected]
2Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Rice Univ., Houston, TX. Email: [email protected]
Andres Gonzalez, Ph.D. [email protected]
3Assistant Professor, School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Univ. of Oklahoma. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$140.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$140.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share