Chapter
Nov 16, 2022

Accounting for Site Effects to Improve Seismic Hazard Resilience of Pipelines

ABSTRACT

Improving the seismic performance of pipelines is fundamental to achieving resiliency of urban environments against extreme natural events. The vulnerability of pipelines is inevitably associated with their exposure to regional and local geohazards. Seismic hazard assessments of pipelines are uniquely challenged by varying local soil conditions, as evidenced by the concentration of damages in areas prone to ground motion amplification and liquefaction. This paper focuses on the hazard associated with transient seismic waves, which affects the entire pipeline system as opposed to the localized effects imposed by ground failure. Our study provides a review of seismic hazard assessments of pipeline networks and current practices to account for site effects. More specifically, we review available methods to consider the effects of local soil conditions on the seismic demands of pipelines, soil-pipe interaction, spatial variability in soils, and ground motion directionality. First, we summarize relevant observations from past seismic events and then, an evaluation of current practices to account for site effects is provided. Strengths and limitations of simplified approaches are revised and compared to methods that target the quantification of site effects and the network response on a broader regional scale. Areas of future research are identified as potential paths toward improved resiliency of pipelines to seismic hazards.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.

REFERENCES

ALA (American Lifelines Alliance). (2005). Seismic guidelines for water pipelines. Washington, DC.
Asimaki, D., Mohammadi, K., Ayoubi, P., Mayoral, J. M., and Montalva, G. (2020). “Investigating the spatial variability of ground motions during the 2017 Mw 7.1 Puebla-Mexico City earthquake via idealized simulations of basin effects.” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 132, 106073.
Baltay, A. S., Hanks, T. C., and Abrahamson, N. A. (2017). “Uncertainty, variability, and earthquake physics in ground-motion prediction equations.” BSSA, 107(4), 1754–1772.
Borcherdt, R. D. (1994). “Estimates of Site-Dependent Response Spectra for Design (Methodology and Justification).” Earthquake Spectra, 10(4), 617–653.
Borcherdt, R. D., and Gibbs, J. F. (1976). “Effects of local geological conditions in the San Francisco Bay region on ground motions and the intensities of the 1906 earthquake.” Bulletin Seismological Society of America, 66(2), 467–500.
Campbell, K. W. (1991). “An empirical Analysis of Peak Horizontal Acceleration for the Loma Prieta, California, Earthquake of 18 October 1989.” BSSA, 81, 1838–58.
Cloud, W. K., and Hudson, D. E. (1975). “Strong motion data from the San Fernando, California, earthquake of February 9, 1971.” San Fernando, California, California Division of Mines and Geology, 273–303.
Cubrinovski, M., Bradley, B., Wotherspoon, L., Green, R., Bray, J., Wood, C., Pender, M., Allen, J., Bradshaw, A., Rix, G., Taylor, M., Robinson, K., Henderson, D., Giorgini, S., Ma, K., Winkley, A., Zupan, J., O’Rourke, T. T., De Pascale, G., and Wells, D. (2011). “Geotechnical aspects of the 22 February 2011 Christchurch earthquake.” Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 44(4), 205–226.
Chen, W. W., Shih, B. J., Chen, Y. C., Hung, J. H., and Hwang, H. H. (2002). “Seismic response of natural gas and water pipelines in the Ji-Ji earthquake.” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 22(9-12), 1209–1214.
Datta, T. K. (1999). “Seismic response of buried pipelines: A state-of-the-art review.” Nuclear Engineering and Design, 192(2-3):271–284, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-5493(99)00113-2.
Demirci, H. E., Bhattacharya, S., Karamitros, D., and Alexander, N. (2018). “Experimental and numerical modelling of buried pipelines crossing reverse faults.” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 114, 198–214.
Der Kiureghian, A. (1996). “A coherency model for spatially varying ground motions.” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 25, 99–111.
Eskandari, M., Omidvar, B., Modiri, M., Nekooie, M. A., and Alesheikh, A. A. (2017). “Geospatial analysis of earthquake damage probability of water pipelines due to multi-hazard failure.” ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 6(6), 169.
Hashash, Y. M. A., Hook, J. J., Schmidt, B., and Yao, J. I.-C. (2001). “Seismic design and analysis of underground structures.” Tunnelling and Underground Space Tech., 16(2), 247–293.
Hindy, A., and Novak, M. (1979). “Earthquake response of underground pipelines.” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 7, 451–476.
Hossain, J., and Suroor, H. (2016). “Non-linear Dynamic Site Response Analysis for Subsea Pipeline and Structures Seismic Design Considering Variable Site Conditions.” In Offshore Technology Conference.
Jayaram, N., and Baker, J. W. (2008). “Statistical tests of the joint distribution of spectral acceleration values.” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 98(5), 2231–2243.
Jayaram, N., and Baker, J. W. (2009). “Correlation model for spatially distributed ground‐motion intensities.” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 38(15), 1687–1708.
JWWA (Japan Water Works Association). (1997). Seismic Design and Construction Guidelines for Water Supply Facilities. Japan Water Works Association.
Karamanos, S. A., Sarvanis, G. C., Keil, B. D., and Card, R. J. (2017). “Analysis and design of buried steel water pipelines in seismic areas.” Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice, 8(4), 04017018.
Kotha, S. R., Bindi, D., and Cotton, F. (2016). “Partially non-ergodic region specific GMPE for Europe and Middle-East.” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 14(4), 1245–1263.
Kramer, S. L. (1996). Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Kuehn, N. M., Abrahamson, N. A., and Walling, M. A. (2019). “Incorporating nonergodic path effects into the NGA-West2 ground-motion prediction equations.” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 109, 575–585.
Kuwata, Y., Sato, K., and Kato, S. (2018). “Seismic Vulnerability of a Water-Supply Pipeline Based on the Damage Analysis of Two Earthquakes During the Great East Japan Earthquake.” Journal of Japan Association for Earthquake Engineering, 18(3), 91–103.
Landwehr, N., Kuehn, N. M., Scheffer, T., and Abrahamson, N. (2016). “A nonergodic ground‐motion model for California with spatially varying coefficients.” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 106(6), 2574–2583.
Leyton, F., Ruiz, S., Sepúlveda, S. A., Contreras, J. P., Rebolledo, S., and Astroza, M. (2013). “Microtremors’ HVSR and its correlation with surface geology and damage observed after the 2010 Maule earthquake (Mw 8.8) at Talca and Curicó, Central Chile.” Engineering Geology, 161, 26–33.
Matsuhashi, M., Tsushima, I., Fukatani, W., and Yokota, T. (2014). “Damage to sewage systems caused by the Great East Japan Earthquake, and governmental policy.” Soils and Foundations, 54(4), 902–909.
Miyajima, M. (2012). “Damage analysis of water supply facilities in the 2011 great east Japan earthquake and tsunami.” In 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering.
Mouroux, P., and Le Brun, B. (2006). “Presentation of RISK-UE project” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 4(4), 323–339.
Newmark, N. M. (1968). “Problems in wave propagation in soil and rock.” Proc., International Symposium on Wave Propagation and Dynamic Properties of Earth Materials.
O’Rourke, M. J., and Hmadi, K. E. (1988). “Analysis of continuous buried pipelines for seismic wave effects.” Earthquake Engineering Structure Dynamics, 16, 917–929.
O’Rourke, M. J., and Liu, X. (1999). Response of buried pipelines subjected to earthquake effects. University of Buffalo, USA.
O’Rourke, T. D. (1996). “Lessons learned for lifeline engineering from major urban earthquakes.” In Proceedings, Eleventh World Conference on Earthquake Engineering.
O’Rourke, T. D., and Palmer, M. C. (1996). “Earthquake performance of gas transmission pipelines.” Earthquake Spectra, 12(3), 493–527.
O’Rourke, T. D. (2010). “Geohazards and large, geographically distributed systems.” Géotechnique, 60(7), 505–543.
O’Rourke, T. D., Druschel, S. J., and Netravali, A. N. (1990). « Shear strength characteristics of sand-polymer interfaces.” Journal of geotechnical engineering, 116(3), 451–469.
O’Rourke, T. D., Toprak, S., and Sano, Y. (1998). “Factors affecting water supply damage caused by the Northridge earthquake.” Proc., Sixth US National Conference on Eqk. Eng. EERI.
Paolucci, R., and Pitilakis, K. (2007). “Seismic risk assessment of underground structures under transient ground deformations”. Pitilakis K. (ed.) Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering. Geotechnical, Geological and Earthquake Engineering, Springer, 433–459.
Pitilakis, K. (2004). “Chapter 5: Site effects.” In: Ansal A (ed) Recent advances in earthquake geotechnical engineering & microzonation, Kluwer Publications.
Pitilakis, K., Alexoudi, M., Argyroudis, S., Monge, O., and Martin, C. (2006). “Earthquake risk assessment of lifelines.” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 4(4), 365–390.
Psyrras, N., Kwon, O., Gerasimidis, S., and Sextos, A. (2019). “Can a buried gas pipeline experience local buckling during earthquake ground shaking?” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 116, 511–529.
Psyrras, N., and Sextos, A. (2018). “Safety of buried steel natural gas pipelines under earthquake-induced ground shaking. A review.” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Eng., 106, 254–277.
Ramos-Sepulveda, M., and Cabas, A. (2021). Site Effects on Ground Motion Directionality: Lessons Learned from Case Studies in Japan, ASCE Journal of Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Volume 147, 106755.
Rodriguez‐Marek, A., Rathje, E. M., Bommer, J. J., Scherbaum, F., and Stafford, P. J. (2014). “Application of single‐station sigma and site‐response characterization in a probabilistic seismic‐hazard analysis for a new nuclear site.” BSSA, 104(4), 1601–1619.
Seed, H. B., and Idriss, I. M. (1969). “The influence of soil conditions on ground motions during earthquakes.” Journal of the Soil Mech. and Foundation Eng. Division, ASCE, 94, 93–137.
Trifunac, M. D., and Lee, V. W. (1996). “Peak surface strains during strong earthquake motion.” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 15(5), 311–319.
Tsinidis, G., Di Sarno, L., Sextos, A., and Furtner, P. (2019). “A critical review on the vulnerability assessment of natural gas pipelines subjected to seismic wave propagation. Part 1: Fragility relations and implemented seismic intensity measures.” Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 86, 279–296.
Wakamatsu, K., Nagata, S., Maruyama, Y., and Ozawa, K. (2016). “Sendai Water Pipeline Response to the 2011 Tohoku Earthquake.” Journal of Civil Eng. and Architecture, 10, 461–470.
Wham, B. P., Dashti, S., Franke, K., Kayen, R., and Oettle, N. K. (2017). “Water Supply Damage Caused by the 2016 Kumamoto Earthquake.” Lowland Tech. Intl. J., 19(3), 151–160.
Yoon, S. W., Kim, S. J., and Park, D. (2020). “Estimation of Seismically Induced Longitudinal Strain in Pipelines Subjected to Incident Shear Wave.” KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 24(8), 2322–2332.
Zerva, A., and Zervas, V. (2002). “Spatial variation of seismic ground motions.” Applied Mechanics Reviews, 55(3), 271–297.
Zerva, A. (1993). “Pipeline response to directionally and spatially correlated seismic ground motions.”

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Lifelines 2022
Lifelines 2022
Pages: 194 - 206

History

Published online: Nov 16, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ashly Cabas, Ph.D. [email protected]
1Dept. of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC. Email: [email protected]
Cristina Lorenzo-Velázquez [email protected]
2Dept. of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$140.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$140.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share