Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Wastewater Pipelines
Publication: Lifelines 2022
ABSTRACT
This paper reports on a half-year study to assess the seismic risk of Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District (SRCSD) and Sacramento Area Sewer District (SASD) pipelines and critical facilities. SRCSD mainly collects and conveys bulk sewage while SASD is a local sewage collection agency. While the Sacramento area is not subject to the same level of seismic hazard as nearby San Francisco, it has experienced the effects of earthquakes in the past (e.g., 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake). Since 1950, roughly two dozen seismic events have occurred within 100 km of Sacramento. To understand the risk that these systems currently face, a high-level desktop study that incorporated our best understanding of seismic hazards in the region and how pipelines will respond to various levels of earthquake effects, including strong ground shaking and liquefaction-induced ground failure, was performed. The study quantified current risks and then evaluated whether cost-effective solutions existed to mitigate these risks. Four different products were delivered where each product was useful in evaluating different mitigation strategies to reduce future seismic risks. In some cases, the information was important in determining whether earthquake insurance was a viable means of risk transfer. Additionally, we designed planning strategies to reduce overall impacts by relying on proven effective response and recovery planning activities.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.
REFERENCES
Boulanger, R. W., and Idriss, I. M. (2012). Probabilistic Standard Penetration Test–Based Liquefaction–Triggering Procedure.” J. Geo. and Geoen. Eng., 138(10).
BSSC. (2003). NEHRP Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings and Other Structures,”, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington D.C.
California Department of Water Resources Groundwater Information Center. (2018). Interactive Map Application: https://gis.water.ca.gov/app/gicima/, Spring, 2018.
FEMA. (2013). Hazus-MH2.1, Earthquake Model, https://www.fema.gov/media-library-data/20130726-1820-25045-6286/hzmh2_1_eq_tm.pdf.
Field, E. H., Biasi, G. P., et al. (2013). Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast, version 3 (UCERF3) - The time-independent model,.
Gutierrez, C. I. (2011). Preliminary Geologic Map of the Sacramento 30' x 60' Quadrangle, California. California Geological Survey.
Honegger, D. G., and Eguchi, R. T. (1992). Determination of Relative Vulnerabilities to Seismic Damage for San Diego County Water Authority Water Transmission Pipelines.
Ishihara, K., and Yoshimine, M. (1992). Evaluation of settlements in sand deposits following liquefaction during earthquakes. Soils and Foundations, 32(1), pp. 173-188.
Lee, Y., Graf, W. P., and Hu, Z. (2018). Characterizing the Logic Tree Distribution in the USGS 2014 National Seismic Hazard Mapping Project. Bull. Seismo. So. of Am., 108(3A).
PEER (Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center). (2013). NGA West2 Final Product. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center: https://peer.berkeley.edu/research/nga-west-2/.
Lund, L. V. (1992). Study of Damage Caused by the Northridge Earthquake, January 17, 1994.
PEER (Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center). (2013). NGA West2 Final Product: https://peer.berkeley.edu/research/nga-west-2/.
Sadigh, K., Egan, J. A., and Youngs, R. R. (1986). Specification of Ground Motion for Seismic Design of Long Period Structures, Earthquake Notes, 57(1), p. 13.
Taylor, C. E. (2015). Robust Simulation for Mega-Risks—The Path from Single Solutions to Competitive, Multi-Solution Methods for Mega-Risk Management, Springer International Publishing, New York, New York, ISBN: 978-3-319-19413-4.
Wills, C. J., Gutierrez, C. I., Perez, F. G., and Branum, D. M. (2015). A Next Generation VS30 Map for California Based on Geology and Topography, Bull. Seismo. So. of Am., 105(6).
Youd, T. L., and Perkins, D. M. (1978). Mapping of Liquefaction Induced Ground Failure Potential, J. Geo. Eng. Div., Am. Soc. of Civ. Eng., 104(4), pp. 433-446.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
History
Published online: Nov 16, 2022
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.