Chapter
Aug 31, 2022

Prioritizing Locations for Safety Improvement: An Integrated Disutility-Based Approach

Publication: International Conference on Transportation and Development 2022

ABSTRACT

Location prioritization is a crucial phase of transportation planning and requires a rational approach to achieve acceptable results. This research applies an integrated multi-criteria decision-making framework in location prioritization for road safety improvement. The objective of the study was to prioritize two locations from each of four national highways, four districts, and four urban neighborhoods in Bangladesh. The framework adopted a disutility-based approach integrated with the best-worst method (BWM) to determine the most hazardous locations among the alternatives from a road safety standpoint. The alternatives were evaluated based on criteria and sub-criteria, such as traffic parameters and demographic factors. The relative weights of criteria and sub-criteria were estimated from pair-wise comparison conducted by a team of experts, decision-makers, and stakeholders using a modified Delphi approach. The criteria concerning safety hazards were considered as disutility and appraised as a negative value, whereas the facility-related criteria were considered as utility and appraised as a positive value. Altogether, the total sum of disutility and utility value for a particular location revealed the existing safety scenario. Results show that the developed models were able to effectively prioritize among the alternatives maintaining a very high consistency ratio. The findings presented in this paper can work as a framework for location prioritization globally.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.

REFERENCES

Anon. 2017. Planning and Prioritisation of Rural Roads in Bangladesh Report of the First Stakeholders Workshop. Vol. 2016.
Anon. n.d. States ’ Approaches to Transportation Project Prioritization How Should Illinois Prioritize Its Transportation Project Investments ?
Berechman, J., and R. E. Paaswell. 2005. “Evaluation, Prioritization and Selection of Transportation Investment Projects in New York City.” Transportation 32(3):223–49. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-004-7271-x.
Broniewicz, E., and K. Ogrodnik. 2020. “Multi-Criteria Analysis of Transport Infrastructure Projects.” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 83:102351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102351.
Duleba, S., S. Moslem, and D. Esztergár-Kiss. 2021. “Estimating Commuting Modal Split by Using the Best-Worst Method.” European Transport Research Review 13(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12544-021-00489-z.
Fancello, G., M. Carta, and P. Fadda. 2019. “Road Intersections Ranking for Road Safety Improvement: Comparative Analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods.” Transport Policy 80(April):188–96. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.04.007.
Gallagher, R. 2016. Cost-Benefit Analysis: Dhaka’s Future Urban Transport Bangladesh Priorities.
Gan, A., P. Alluri, K. Liu, and D. Saha. n.d. Updating and Improving Methodology for Prioritizing Highway Project Locations on the Strategic Intermodal System ( SIS ).
Hamurcu, M., and T. Eren. 2018. “An Application of Multicriteria Decision-Making for the Evaluation of Alternative Monorail Routes.” Mathematics 7(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/math7010016.
Hauer, E. 2011. “Computing What the Public Wants: Some Issues in Road Safety Cost–Benefit Analysis.” Accident Analysis & Prevention 43(1):151–64. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2010.08.004.
Ivanović, I., D. Grujičić, D. Macura, J. Jović, and N. Bojović. 2013. “One Approach for Road Transport Project Selection.” Transport Policy 25:22–29. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.10.001.
Kabir, G., R. Sadiq, and S. Tesfamariam. 2014a. “A Review of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods for Infrastructure Management.” Structure and Infrastructure Engineering 10(9):1176–1210. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2013.795978.
Kabir, G., R. Sadiq, and S. Tesfamariam. 2014b. “A Review of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods for Infrastructure Management.” Structure and Infrastructure Engineering 10(9):1176–1210. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2013.795978.
Maitra, B., M. Azmi, and S. N. Ibrahim. 2002. “Prioritization of Road Projects- A Disutility Based Approach.” XVII(2):52–56.
Marcelo, D., C. Mandri-perrott, and S. House. 2015. Prioritization of Infrastructure Projects : A Decision Support Framework. 1–30.
Moslem, S., M. Gul, D. Farooq, E. Celik, O. Ghorbanzadeh, and T. Blaschke. 2020. “An Integrated Approach of Best-Worst Method (Bwm) and Triangular Fuzzy Sets for Evaluating Driver Behavior Factors Related to Road Safety.” Mathematics 8(3). doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/math8030414.
Ortega, J., S. Moslem, J. Tóth, T. Péter, J. Palaguachi, and M. Paguay. 2020. “Using Best Worst Method for Sustainable Park and Ride Facility Location.” Sustainability (Switzerland) 12(23):1–18. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su122310083.
Pal, S., B. Maitra, and J. R. Sarkar. 2016. “An Approach for Prioritization of State Highways and Its Application.” Transportation in Developing Economies 2(2):1–10. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40890-016-0017-6.
Raihan, M. A., P. Alluri, A. Gan, and R. Jung. 2016. Application of the Analytic Network Process (ANP) in Prioritizing Highway Improvement Locations.
Rezaei, J. 2015. “Best-Worst Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Method.” Omega (United Kingdom) 53:49–57. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2014.11.009.
Rezaei, J. 2016. “Best-Worst Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Method: Some Properties and a Linear Model.” Omega (United Kingdom) 64:126–30. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2015.12.001.
Rezaei, J. 2019. “BWM : Best Worst Method.” 1–34. Retrieved July 24, 2021 (https://bestworstmethod.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Best-Worst-Method-BWM-2019.pdf).
Rezaei, J., O. Kothadiya, L. Tavasszy, and M. Kroesen. 2018. “Quality Assessment of Airline Baggage Handling Systems Using SERVQUAL and BWM.” Tourism Management 66:85–93. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2017.11.009.
Rezaei, J., T. Nispeling, J. Sarkis, and L. Tavasszy. 2016. “A Supplier Selection Life Cycle Approach Integrating Traditional and Environmental Criteria Using the Best Worst Method.” Journal of Cleaner Production 135:577–88. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.125.
Saaty, T. L. 1980. The Analytic Hierarchy Process.
Sadeghi, A., and A. Mohammadzadeh Moghaddam. 2016. “Uncertainty-Based Prioritization of Road Safety Projects: An Application of Data Envelopment Analysis.” Transport Policy 52:28–36. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.07.003.
Sadjadi, S. J., and M. Karimi. 2018. “Best-Worst Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Method: A Robust Approach.” Decision Science Letters 7(4):323–40. doi: https://doi.org/10.5267/j.dsl.2018.3.003.
Shelton, J., and M. Medina. 2010. “Integrated Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making Method to Prioritize Transportation Projects.” Transportation Research Record (2174):51–57. doi: https://doi.org/10.3141/2174-08.
Shojaei, P., S. A. Seyed Haeri, and S. Mohammadi. 2018. “Airports Evaluation and Ranking Model Using Taguchi Loss Function, Best-Worst Method and VIKOR Technique.” Journal of Air Transport Management 68:4–13. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2017.05.006.
Tsamboulas, D. A. 2007. “A Tool for Prioritizing Multinational Transport Infrastructure Investments.” Transport Policy 14(1):11–26. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2006.06.001.
Wasserman, D. 2012. North Carolina ’ s Transportation Reform : Prioritization, Outreach, and Reality North Carolina Department of Transportation.
Wei, H.-H., M. Liu, M. J. Skibniewski, and V. Balali. 2016. “Prioritizing Sustainable Transport Projects through Multicriteria Group Decision Making: Case Study of Tianjin Binhai New Area, China.” Journal of Management in Engineering 32(5):4016010. doi: https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)me.1943-5479.0000449.
Yu, J., and Y. Liu. 2012. “Prioritizing Highway Safety Improvement Projects: A Multi-Criteria Model and Case Study with SafetyAnalyst.” Safety Science 50(4):1085–92. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2011.11.018.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to International Conference on Transportation and Development 2022
International Conference on Transportation and Development 2022
Pages: 287 - 300

History

Published online: Aug 31, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Md. Rifat H. Bhuiyan [email protected]
1Lecturer, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Islamic Univ. of Technology, Gazipur, Bangladesh. Email: [email protected]
Md. A. Raihan, Ph.D. [email protected]
2Assistant Professor, Accident Research Institute, Bangladesh Univ. of Engineering and Technology, Dhaka, Bangladesh. Email: [email protected]
Moinul Hossain, Ph.D. [email protected]
3Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Islamic Univ. of Technology, Gazipur, Bangladesh. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$80.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$80.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share