Using Artificial Intelligence for Water Pipeline Infrastructure Asset Management
Publication: Pipelines 2022
ABSTRACT
It is critical for society that we transform our siloed water management and infrastructure systems into smart, connected, sustainable, and resilient systems. This transformation can help us to address the effects of increasing extreme climate events, ecosystem demands, rapid global urbanization, and infrastructure deterioration from age and neglect. As water utilities improve their asset management programs, it is imperative that the data-driven decision support systems represent the complexities within water pipeline infrastructure systems. Artificial intelligence (AI) techniques can enable modelers to train mathematical algorithms to learn complex patterns from data and represent the water pipeline infrastructure systems accurately. PIPEiD is a national database platform that uses artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning techniques to assess the performance and risk of water pipelines to help utilities better assess pipe replacement decisions and allocate funding. PIPEiD (Pipeline Infrastructure Database) will assist water sector utilities to manage water pipeline infrastructure systems more effectively for performance, resiliency, and sustainability. PIPEiD will provide the secure, robust, and centralized web-based database platform to address all three major infrastructure asset management levels: strategic, tactical, and operational for utilities of all sizes (small, medium, and large) across the country. The research team collected field performance data for potable, raw, and reuse water pipelines made from materials reflecting the wide range of pipes currently in the ground throughout the US, including cast and ductile iron, prestressed concrete cylinder pipe, reinforced concrete, steel, thermoplastic, PVC, and asbestos. The researchers worked to collect data distributed across different ecological areas, or cohorts, organized based on the climatic conditions of the 500 water utilities’ locations. These cohorts included coastal, arid, Arctic, and mountainous regions. Researchers factored in environmental conditions, such as soil corrosivity, traffic loading, and frost action, that can affect pipelines. The team enhanced the data set out further with the help of external sources like the United States Geological Survey (USGS), the Soil Survey Geographic Database from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), and additional field data collected by a group of 25 water utilities across the country that were selected to validate the models and tools. This paper will present various applications of artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithms for advanced asset management of water pipeline infrastructure systems.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.
REFERENCES
Folkman, S. (2018). “Water Main Break Rates In the USA and Canada: A Comprehensive Study”. Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Faculty Publications. Paper 174. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/mae_facpub/174.
Dawood, T. (2020). “Artificial intelligence for the modeling of water pipes deterioration mechanisms”. Automation in Construction. Volume 120.
Fact Sheet: The Bipartisan Infrastructure Deal. (2021). “The White House”. https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/11/06/fact-sheet-the-bipartisan-infrastructure-deal/.
Local Government Investment in Water and Sewer, 2000-2015. “The United States Conference of Mayors”. https://www.usmayors.org/2018/01/10/local-government-investment-in-water-and-sewer-2000-2015/.
Baird, G., et al. (2019). “How Cost Effective Is Machine Learning/AI Applied to Leak Detection and Pipe Replacement Prioritization”, Pipelines 2019, ASCE.
Dawood, T. (2020). “Water pipe failure prediction and risk models: State-of-the-art review”. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering. Volume 47.
Kapelan, Z. (2020). “Artificial Intelligence Solutions for the Water Sector”. The International Water Association. https://iwa-network.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/IWA_2020_Artificial_Intelligence_SCREEN.pdf.
Rajani, B., et al. (2001). “Comprehensive review of structural deterioration of water mains: physically based models”. Urban Water. Volume 3. Pages 151–164.
Deb, K., et al. “Quantifying Future Rehabilitation and Replacement Needs of Water Mains”, The Water Research Foundation,.
Giustolisi, O., et al. (2006). “A symbolic data-driven technique based on evolutionary polynomial regression”. Journal of Hydroinformatics. Volume 8.
Jafar, R., et al. (2010). “Application of Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) to model the failure of urban water mains”. Mathematical and Computer Modelling. Volume 51.
Chae, M., et al. (2001). “Neuro-Fuzzy Approaches for Sanitary Sewer Pipeline Condition Assessment”. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering. Volume 15.
Zhang, C., et al. (2020). “Water pipe failure prediction using AutoML”. Facilities.
“Study Warns Pipe Failures are Cause for Concern”. Underground Construction, 2018. Volume 73. https://ucononline.com/magazine/2018/april-2018-vol-73-no-4/features/study-warns-pipe-failures-are-cause-for-concern.
Vishwakarma, A., et al. (2020). “Development of a Consequence of Failure Model and Risk Matrix for Water Pipelines Infrastructure Systems”, Pipelines 2020, ASCE.
Vishwakarma, A., et al. (2019). Development Of A Performance Analysis Framework For Water Pipeline Infrastructure Using Systems Understanding, VTechWorks.
Vishwakarma, A., et al. (2020). “Development of a Performance-Based Economic Lifecycle Model for Water Pipeline Infrastructure Systems”, Pipelines 2020, ASCE.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
History
Published online: Jul 28, 2022
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.