Chapter
Mar 17, 2022

Numerical Investigation of Vs Spatial Variability Effects on the Seismic Response Estimated Using 2D and 1D Site Response Analyses

Publication: Geo-Congress 2022

ABSTRACT

One-dimensional site response analyses (1D SRAs) are the most widely used tool to assess site-specific seismic response. However, compared to 2D and 3D SRAs, 1D SRAs are limited in their ability to capture some wave propagation mechanisms. Here, 2D and 1D SRAs are conducted on VS correlated random fields to evaluate: (1) the discrepancies in the median 2D and 1D seismic responses, (2) the effects of VS spatial variability features (e.g., correlation length, θ) on the 2D response, and (3) the effect of using 1D SRA-based ground motions to estimate intensity measures (IMs) towards getting insight into the seismic performance of geosystems. Results indicate that (1) median 2D responses are higher than median 1D responses, and the discrepancy increases with VS variability (σlnVs), (2) σlnVs has a stronger effect than other VS variability features on the 2D and 1D seismic responses, and (3) IMs might be underpredicted when estimated using 1D SRA-based ground motions, and thus the expected geosystems’ seismic performance overestimated.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.

REFERENCES

Afshari, K., and Stewart, J. P. (2019). “Insights from California vertical arrays on the effectiveness of ground response analysis with alternative damping models.” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 109: 1250–1264.
Ancheta, T. D., Darragh, R. B., Stewart, J. P., Seyhan, E., Silva, W. J., Chiou, B. S.-J., Wooddell, K. E., Graves, R. W., Kottke, A. R., Boore, D. M., Kishida, T., and Donahue, J. L. (2013). PEER NGA-West2 database, Richmond, CA.
Arias, A. (1970). A measure of earthquake intensity, In Seismic Design for Nuclear Power Plants (Hansen R. J., ed.), The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Armstrong, R. J., Kishida, T., and Park, D. S. (2020). “Efficiency of ground motion intensity with earthquake–induced earth dam deformations.” Earthquake Spectra, 37(1): 5–25.
Baecher, G., and Christian, J. (2003). Reliability and statistics in geotechnical engineering. Wiley.
de la Torre, C., McGann, C., Bradley, B., and Pletzer. A. (2019). “3D seismic site response with soil heterogeneity and wave scattering in OpenSees.” 1st Eurasian Conference on OpenSEES: OpenSEES Days Eurasia, pp. 255–262.
EPRI. (1988). A criterion for determining exceedance of the operating basis earthquake. EPRI NP-5930, Palo Alto, CA.
EPRI. (2013). Seismic Evaluation Guidance: Screening, Prioritization and Implementation Details (SPID) for the Resolution of Fukushima Near Term Task Force Recommendation 2.1. Seismic. Palo Alto, CA.
Hallal, M. M., and Cox, B. R. (2021). “Comparison of different methods used to account for shear wave velocity variability in 2D ground response analyses.” Int. Found. Con., Dallas, Texas.
Hudson, M. B., Idriss, I. M., and Beikae, M. (2003). QUAD4MU: Addendum to user’s manual for QUAD4M for updates to the QUAD4MU version. March.
Kaklamanos, J., Bradley, B. A., Thompson, E. M., and Baise, L. G. (2013). “Critical parameters affecting bias and variability in site-response analyses using KiK-net downhole array data.” Bulleting of the Seismological Society of America, 103: 1733–1749.
Kaklamanos, J., Bradley, B. A., Moolacattu, A. N., and Picard, B. M. (2020). “Physical hypotheses for adjusting coarse profiles and improving 1D site-response estimation assessed at 10 KiK-net sites.” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 110(3): 1338–1358.
Kamai, R., Abrahamson, N. A., and Silva, W. J. (2016). “VS30 in NGA GMPEs-regional differences and suggested practice.” Earthquake Spectra 32(4): 2083–2108.
Kokusho, T. (2017). Innovative Earthquake Soil Dynamics. CRC Press.
Kuhlemeyer, R. L., and Lysmer, J. (1973). “Finite element method accuracy for wave propagation problems.” J. Soil Mech. Found. Div., 99 (5): 421–427.
Kwok, A. O.-L., Stewart, J. P., Hashash, Y. M. A., Matasovic, N., Pyke, R., Wang, Z., and Yang, Z. (2007). “Use of exact solutions of wave propagation problems to guide implementation of nonlinear seismic ground response analysis procedures.” JGGE, 133(11): 1385–98.
Nour, A., Slimani, A., Laouami, N., and Afra, H. (2003). “Finite element model for the probabilistic seismic response of heterogeneous soil profile.” SDDE, 23(5), 331–348.
Pehlivan, M. (2013). Incorporating site response analysis and associated uncertainties into the seismic hazard assessment of nuclear facilities. Ph.D. dissertation, U. Texas, Austin, TX.
Pehlivan, M., Rathje, E. M., and Gilbert, R. B. (2012). “Influence of 1D and 2D spatial variability on site response analysis.” 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Lisboa.
Pretell, R., Ziotopoulou, K., and Abrahamson, N. A. (2022). “Conducting 1D site response analyses to capture 2D VS spatial variability effects.” Earthquake Spectra. (Accepted.).
Roy, N., Mukherjee, S., and Sahu, R. B. (2020). “Influence of trapped soft/stiff soil layer in seismic site response analysis.” Journal of Earth System Science, 129: 171.
Stewart, J. P., Kwok, A. O.-L., Hashash, Y. M. A., Matasovic, N., Pyke, R., Wang, Z., and Yang, Z. (2008). Benchmarking of nonlinear geotechnical ground response analysis., Richmond, CA.
Tao, Y., and Rathje, E. (2019). “Insights into modeling small-strain site response derived from downhole array data.” J. of Geotechnical and Geoenv. Engineering, 145(7): 04019023.
Teague, D., and Cox, B. (2016). “Site response implications associated with using non-unique VS profiles from surface wave inversion in comparison with other commonly used methods of accounting for VS uncertainty.” Soil Dyn. and Earthquake Eng., 91(2016): 87–103.
Vanmarcke, E. H. (1983). Random fields: Analysis and synthesis. The MIT press, Cambridge.
Wills, C. J., and Clahan, K. B. (2006). “Developing a map of geologically defined site-conditions categories for California.” Bull. Seismological Society of America 96(4A): 1483–1501.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Geo-Congress 2022
Geo-Congress 2022
Pages: 205 - 215

History

Published online: Mar 17, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Renmin Pretell, S.M.ASCE [email protected]
1Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Davis, CA. Email: [email protected]
Katerina Ziotopoulou, Ph.D., M.ASCE [email protected]
P.E.
2Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Davis, CA. Email: [email protected]
Norman A. Abrahamson, Ph.D., M.ASCE [email protected]
3Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$140.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$140.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share