Identifying Rigid Inclusion Design and Construction Risks for Support of Shallow Foundations in New England
Publication: Geo-Congress 2022
ABSTRACT
Rigid inclusions (RI), a form of ground improvement, has become accepted in the United States as a cost-effective alternative to support low- to mid-rise buildings, parking garages, tanks, retaining walls, and embankments, especially in areas with marginal, soft, and compressible ground. RI systems are commonly implemented as a cost-effective alternate to deep foundations for the growing warehouse, distribution, and data center markets. Originally developed by specialty contractors in Europe, this system of support was imported to the US in the early 2000s. For the purposes of this paper RI are defined as unreinforced grout or concrete columns. These systems are typically procured through a design build process and though similar in appearance, the drilling equipment, installation methods, inclusion material, and design methodology, are often proprietary and specific to each specialty contractor. As with other methods of ground improvement, the lack of Building Code regulation, misunderstanding of the technology and poor-quality project specifications can lead to variability in performance, project team expectations, quality control, and verification testing. This paper addresses the authors’ local industry approach of RI systems as support for buildings in New England, specifically in the presence of soft compressible soils such as soft organic or clay deposits. This paper will discuss sites where RI can be considered and will highlight areas of design risk including load transfer layers (i.e., aggregate pads that are used to separate the inclusions from the supported structural foundations), bearing capacity, element structural capacity, settlement of the system, and interactions with building foundations and slabs. Construction risks may be mitigated with thoughtful pre-mobilization planning between Owners, Consultants and Specialty Subcontractors, and robust quality control procedures to address project specific risks (including load testing of elements). This paper will distinctly identify design and construction considerations that should be considered by the engineer and contractor as the use of this technology continues to grow and evolve.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.
REFERENCES
Abramson, L. W., and Green, G. E. (1985). The Reliability of Strain Gauges and Load Cells in Geotechnical Engineering Applications. Transportation Research Board, Washington D.C. 13-19.
Metcalfe, B., Pockoski, M., and Wissmann, K. “Support of High-Rise Building on Organic and Alluvial Deposits Using Rigid Inclusions.”
Gallant, A. P., and Botero-Lopez, D. (2020). “On lateral spreading and the stability of embankments supported on fractured unreinforced rigid columns over soft soils.”
Mazzei, D., Kniss, K., Elsaid, F., and Zhang, Y. (2019). “Rigid Inclusions Ground Improvement for a New Energy Facility: Design, Construction and Full-Scale Embankment Load Testing and Results”, Proceedings of Geo-Congress (GSP 309 pg 101–114), Philadelphia, PA.
Kraemer, S. R., Condon, R. B., and Wissmann, K. June 06, (2018). IFCEE 2018 March 5–10, 2018 | Orlando, Florida “Rigid Inclusion System Supports Multi-Story Residential and Parking Garage Structures in Organic Soil Profile.”
IREX (Institut pour la Recherche et l’Expérimentation en Génie Civil). (2012). Recommendations of the French national project on rigid inclusions ASIRI, Operation of the civil and urban engineering network, France.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
History
Published online: Mar 17, 2022
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.