Chapter
Mar 7, 2022

A Framework for Assessing Strategies to Combat Individuals’ Resistance to Technological Innovation in the Construction Industry

Publication: Construction Research Congress 2022

ABSTRACT

People’s resistance to change has been identified as one of the critical challenges that inhibit the promotion and implementation of new technologies in the construction industry. Researchers have propounded various strategies to mitigate people’s resistance to technological change. However, most of these assertions are based on the researchers’ opinions which should be supported by qualitative evidence. Accordingly, this research adopted a Delphi Survey to solicit the views of a purposively sampled 7 member expert panel assessing the effectiveness of resistance-mitigating strategies. The results highlighted “Training” as the most effective mitigating strategy, followed consecutively by “organisational support,” “enhancing system design,” “education,” “communication,” “participation,” “peer support,” and “incentivization.” Notwithstanding this ranking, the research identified that no single mitigating strategy is optimal for completely curbing resistance. Therefore, this research also provided a framework for selecting the appropriate mitigating strategies according to different resistance scenarios. The findings of this study can better equip stakeholders of the construction industry in handling resistance to technological change.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.

REFERENCES

Abubakar, M., Ibrahim, Y. M., Kado, D., and Bala, K. (2014). “Contractors’ Perception of the Factors Affecting Building Information Modelling (BIM) Adoption in the Nigerian Construction Industry.” Computing in Civil and Building Engineering, Proceedings.
Al-Gahtani, S. S., and King, M. (1999). “Attitudes, satisfaction and usage: factors contributing to each in the acceptance of information technology.” Behaviour & Information Technology, Taylor & Francis, 18(4), 277–297.
Alomari, K. A., Gambatese, J. A., and Tymvios, N. (2018). Risk perception comparison among construction safety professionals: Delphi perspective. Journal of construction engineering and management, 144(12), p.04018107.
Armenakis, A. A., and Bedeian, A. G. (1999). “Organizational change: A review of theory and research in the 1990s.” Journal of management, Sage Publications Sage CA: Thousand Oaks, CA, 25(3), 293–315.
Batarseh, S. (2018). Extrinsic and Intrinsic Drivers of BIM Adoption in Construction Organizations. University of New South Wales.
Bemmels, B., and Reshef, Y. (1991). “Manufacturing employees and technological change.” Journal of Labor Research, Springer, 12(3), 231–246.
Bhattacherjee, A. (1998). “Managerial influences on intraorganizational information technology use: A Principal‐agent model.” Decision Sciences, Wiley Online Library, 29(1), 139–162.
Burnes, B. (2015). “Understanding Resistance to Change – Building on Coch and French.” Journal of Change Management, 15(2), 92–116.
Coch, L., and French, J. R., Jr. (1948). Overcoming resistance to change. Human relations, 1(4), pp.512–532.
Damawan, A. H., and Azizah, S. (2020). “Resistance to Change: Causes and Strategies as an Organizational Challenge.” Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 49–53.
Davis, K. A. (2004). “Information Technology Change in the AEC Industry : An Investigation of Individuals Resistance.” Construction, 370.
Davis, K. A., and Songer, A. D. (2002). “Technological Change in the AEC Industry: A Social Architecture Factor Model of Individuals’ Resistance.” 286–291.
Davis, K. A., and Songer, A. D. (2009). “Resistance to it change in the AEC industry: Are the stereotypes true?” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(12), 1324–1333.
Dunican, B. E. D., and Keaster, R. (2015). “Acceptance of Change: Exploring the Relationship among Psychometric Constructs and Employee Resistance.” International Journal of the Academic Business World, 9(2), 27–38.
Erdogan, B., Anumba, C. J., Bouchlaghem, D., and Nielsen, Y. (2008). “Collaboration environments for construction: Implementation case studies.” Journal of Management in Engineering, American Society of Civil Engineers, 24(4), 234–244.
Ezcan, V., Goulding, J. S., and Arif, M. (2020). “Redefining ICT embeddedness in the construction industry : maximizing technology diffusion capabilities to support agility.” Building Research & Information, Taylor & Francis.
Ferron, W. J. (2018). Roadmap for BIM Adoption and Implementation by Small-Sized Construction Companies. Oregon State University.
Gore, J. E. (2010). Towards Defining Categories of Innovativeness for the Construction Industry. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
Green, R. A. (2017). “Effecting Organizational Change at the Macro Level of Professions.
Gu, N., and London, K. (2010). “Understanding and facilitating BIM adoption in the AEC industry.” Automation in Construction, 19(8), 988–999.
Haddad, C. J. (1996). “Employee attitudes toward new technology in a unionized manufacturing plant.” Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, Elsevier, 13(2), 145–162.
Hasson, F., Keeney, S., and McKenna, H. (2000). “Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique.” Journal of advanced nursing, Wiley Online Library, 32(4), 1008–1015.
Henderson, J. R., and Ruikar, K. (2010). “Technology implementation strategies for construction organisations.” Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 17(3), 309–327.
Hosseini, M. R., Chileshe, N., Zuo, J., and Baroudi, B. (2012). “Approaches of Implementing ICT Technologies within the Construction Industry.” Australasian Journal of Construction Economics and Building Conference Series.
Igbaria, M., Parasuraman, S., and Baroudi, J. J. (1996). “A motivational model of microcomputer usage.” Journal of management information systems, Taylor & Francis, 13(1), 127–143.
Ishak, S. S. M. (2013). Resistance factors to technology innovation in construction organisations. University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Klonek, F. E., Lehmann-Willenbrock, N., and Kauffeld, S. (2014). “Dynamics of resistance to change: A sequential analysis of change agents in action.” Journal of Change Management, 14(3), 334–360.
Lines, B. C., Sullivan, K. T., Smithwick, J. B., and Mischung, J. (2015). “Overcoming resistance to change in engineering and construction: Change management factors for owner organizations.” International Journal of Project Management, Elsevier B.V., 33(5), 1170–1179.
Linstone, H. A. (1985). The delphi technique. In Environmental impact assessment, technology assessment, and risk analysis (pp. 621–649). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Lu, H., Pishdad-Bozorgi, P., Wang, G., Xue, Y., and Tan, D. (2019). “ICT Implementation of Small- and Medium-Sized Construction Enterprises : Organizational Characteristics, Driving Forces, and Value Perceptions.” Sustainability, 1–20.
Lu, Y., Li, Y., Skibniewski, M., Wu, Z., Wang, R., and Le, Y. (2015). “Information and Communication Technology Applications in Architecture, Engineering, and Construction Organizations : A 15-Year Review.” Journal of Management in Engineering, 31(1), 1–19.
O’Brien, W. J., Sankaran, B., Leite, F. L., Khwaja, N., Palma, I. D. S., Goodrum, P., Molenaar, K., Nevett, G., and Johnson, J. (2016). Civil Integrated Management (CIM) for Departments of Transportation.
Olawumi, T. O., Chan, D. W. M., Wong, J. K. W., and Chan, A. P. C. (2018). “Barriers to the integration of BIM and sustainability practices in construction projects: A Delphi survey of international experts.” Journal of Building Engineering, Elsevier Ltd, 20(July), 60–71.
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations. Free Press, New York.
Sediqi, M. (2018). The Incentives For and Barriers to 4D BIM Adoption within Swedish Construction Companies. Royal Institute of Technology Stockholm, Sweden.
Talukder, M. (2012). “Factors affecting the adoption of technological innovation by individual employees : An Australian study.” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Elsevier B.V., 40, 52–57.
Venkatesh, V. (2000). “Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use : Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model.” Information Systems Research, (September 2020).
Venkatesh, V., and Bala, H. (2008). “Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions.” Decision sciences.
Venkatesh, V., and Davis, F. D. (2000). “A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies.” Management science, INFORMS, 46(2), 186–204.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., and Davis, F. D. (2003). “User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view.” MIS quarterly, JSTOR, 27(3), 425–478.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Construction Research Congress 2022
Construction Research Congress 2022
Pages: 974 - 982

History

Published online: Mar 7, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Yelly Kwesy Lawluvy [email protected]
1Dept. of Civil Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool Univ., China. Email: [email protected]
2Dept. of Civil Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool Univ., China. Email: [email protected]
Kaiyang Wang [email protected]
3Dept. of Civil Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool Univ., China. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$226.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$226.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share