Chapter
Mar 7, 2022

Are Different Innovations More Challenging to Implement? A Comparison of Different Types of Changes in the AEC

Publication: Construction Research Congress 2022

ABSTRACT

The architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) industry is introduced to a lot of innovations and changes in various types such as technology (software and hardware informational systems), management process (alternative project delivery, alternative procurement methods, and process improvements), and business structure (mergers, acquisitions, reorganizations, prefabrication, etc.). The industry is rapidly adopting different types of changes. The objective of the study was to determine if certain types of change are harder than others to successfully adopt and implement. An industry-wide approach was taken using an online survey methodology to collect more than 500 cases of organization-wide changes from AEC firms across the United States and Canada. The method of analysis includes reliability testing, principal component analysis, and group differences. The results showed that successful adoption rates of different types of change were not significantly different for certain change types than the others. Further analysis was performed to determine if different demographical considerations of adopting organizations (type and size) had different rates of successful adoption of change. The overall successful adoption rates were generally consistent between different demographical considerations of adopting organizations, but there were minor differences. The discussion addresses those minor differences and provides possible explanations. For example, higher rates of successful adoption were found in specialized firms (roofing contractors, plumbing contractors, etc.) when compared to wide-focused firms (general contractors, EPC firms, etc.). This study contributes an industry-wide view of successful change adoption rates between different types of changes and different demographical considerations of adopting organizations in the AEC industry.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.

REFERENCES

Abdel-Wahab, M., and Vogl, B. 2011. Trends of productivity growth in the construction industry across Europe, US and Japan. Construction Management & Economics, 29, 635–644.
Ahn, M. J., Adamson, J. S. A., and Dornbusch, D. 2004. From Leaders to Leadership: Managing Change. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 10, 112–123.
Aldossari Khaled, M., Lines Brian, C., Smithwick Jake, B., Hurtado Kristen, C., and Sullivan Kenneth, T. 2020. Best practices of organizational change for adopting alternative project delivery methods in the AEC industry.
Becerik-Gerber, B., and Kensek, K. 2010. Building Information Modeling in Architecture, Engineering, and Construction: Emerging Research Directions and Trends. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 136, 139–147.
Beer, M., and Nohria, N. 2000. Breaking the code of change: Harvard Business School Press Boston, MA.
Burnes, B. 2009. Managing Change London: Prentice-Hall.
Carreira, P., Castelo, T., Gomes, C. C., Ferreira, A., Ribeiro, C., and Costa, A. A. 2018. Virtual reality as integration environments for facilities management: Application and users perception. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 25, 90–112.
Chong, H. Y., Lopez, R., Wang, J., Wang, X., and Zhao, Z. 2016. Comparative Analysis on the Adoption and Use of BIM in Road Infrastructure Projects. Journal of Management in Engineering, 32, 05016021.
Crew, W. A. 2017. Best Practices Create Innovation and Improved Competitiveness. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 143, 02517005.
Damanpour, F. 1992. Organizational Size and Innovation. Organization Studies, 13, 375–402.
Davila Delgado, J. M., Oyedele, L., Beach, T., and Demian, P. 2020. Augmented and virtual reality in construction: drivers and limitations for industry adoption. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146, 04020079.
De La Boutetière, H., Montagner, A., and Reich, A. 2018. Unlocking success in digital transformations. McKinsey & Company, 1–14.
Devellis, R. F. 2003. Scale development: Theory and applications in Applied Social Research. Thousand Oaks California: Sage.
Dunn, O. J. 1964. Multiple comparisons using rank sums. Technometrics, 6, 241–252.
Edirisinghe, R. 2019. Digital skin of the construction site: Smart sensor technologies towards the future smart construction site. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26, 184–223.
Gan, X.-L., Chang, R.-D., Langston, C., and Wen, T. 2019. Exploring the interactions among factors impeding the diffusion of prefabricated building technologies. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management.
Gholizadeh, P., Esmaeili, B., and Goodrum, P. 2018. Diffusion of Building Information Modeling Functions in the Construction Industry. Journal of Management in Engineering, 34, 04017060.
Kaiser, H. F. 1974. An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39, 31–36.
Kline, R. B. 2005. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling New York: Guildford.
Lee, S., and Yu, J. 2016. Comparative Study of BIM Acceptance between Korea and the United States. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 142, 05015016.
Liao, L., and Teo, E. A. L. 2018. Organizational Change Perspective on People Management in BIM Implementation in Building Projects. Journal of Management in Engineering, 34, 04018008.
Lines, B. C., and Reddy Vardireddy, P. K. 2017. Drivers of Organizational Change within the AEC Industry: Linking Change Management Practices with Successful Change Adoption. Journal of Management in Engineering, 33, 04017031.
Lines, B. C., and Smithwick, J. B. 2019. Best practices for organizational change management within electrical contractors. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 15, 136–159.
Liu, R., Du, J., Issa, R. R. A., and Giel, B. 2017. BIM Cloud Score: Building Information Model and Modeling Performance Benchmarking. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 143, 04016109.
Loosemore, M. 2014. Improving construction productivity: a subcontractor’s perspective. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 21, 245–260.
Maali, O., Lines, B., Smithwick, J., Hurtado, K., and Sullivan, K. 2020. Change management practices for adopting new technologies in the design and construction industry. Journal of Information Technology in Construction, 25, 325–341.
Müller, R., and Turner, J. R. 2007. Matching the project manager’s leadership style to project type. International journal of project management, 25, 21–32.
Nnaji, C., Gambatese, J., Karakhan, A., and Eseonu, C. 2019. Influential safety technology adoption predictors in construction. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management.
Rahman, M. M. 2014. Barriers of Implementing Modern Methods of Construction. Journal of Management in Engineering, 30, 69–77.
Said, H. 2015. Prefabrication Best Practices and Improvement Opportunities for Electrical Construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 141, 04015045.
Sepasgozar, S. M. E., Davis, S., Loosemore, M., and Bernold, L. 2018a. An investigation of modern building equipment technology adoption in the Australian construction industry. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 25, 1075–1091.
Sepasgozar, S. M. E., Davis, S. R., Li, H., and Luo, X. 2018b. Modeling the Implementation Process for New Construction Technologies: Thematic Analysis Based on Australian and U.S. Practices. Journal of Management in Engineering, 34, 05018005.
Siddiqui, S. Q., Ullah, F., Thaheem, M. J., and Gabriel, H. F. 2016. Six Sigma in construction: a review of critical success factors. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 7, 171–186.
Sveikauskas, L., Rowe, S., Mildenberger, J. D., Price, J., and Young, A. 2018. Measuring productivity growth in construction. Monthly Labor Review, 1–34.
Tabachnick, B. G., Fidell, L. S., and Ullman, J. B. 2007. Using multivariate statistics: Pearson Boston, MA.
Teicholz, P. 2013. Labor-productivity declines in the construction industry: causes and remedies (a second look).
Thurstone, L. 1947. Multiple factor analysis Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Vass, S., and Gustavsson, T. K. 2017. Challenges when implementing BIM for industry change. Construction management and economics, 35, 597–610.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Construction Research Congress 2022
Construction Research Congress 2022
Pages: 922 - 931

History

Published online: Mar 7, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

1Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering, Univ. of Kansas, Lawrence, KS. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2946-2025. Email: [email protected]
Amirali Shalwani, Ph.D. [email protected]
2Dept. of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering, Univ. of Kansas, Lawrence, KS. Email: [email protected]
Brian Lines, Ph.D. [email protected]
P.E.
3Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering, Univ. of Kansas, Lawrence, KS. Email: [email protected]
Kristen Hurtado, Ph.D. [email protected]
4Assistant Research Professor, School of Sustainable Engineering and the Built Environment, Arizona State Univ., Tempe, AZ. Email: [email protected]
Kenneth Sullivan, Ph.D. [email protected]
5Associate Professor, School of Sustainable Engineering and the Built Environment, Arizona State Univ., Tempe, AZ. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$226.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$226.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share