Chapter
Mar 7, 2022

Making Project Risk Response Decisions through Stakeholders’ Impact on Project Risk Interaction

Publication: Construction Research Congress 2022

ABSTRACT

Complex stakeholders’ relationships and the project risks interactions exist in today’s construction projects due to the increasing project complexity, especially in mega projects. In order to identify critical risks, it is imperative to clarify the stakeholders’ relationships, the process of risk interaction, and how stakeholders’ behaviors influence the occurrence and the controlling of risks in the project. The purpose of this work is to evaluate the stakeholders’ impact on the project risk interaction by building a two-layer network model and promote the effectiveness of risk control through identifying the key network nodes. The two-layer network model includes a stakeholder relationship network (SRN) and a risk interaction network (RIN), as well as the links between the two networks. The key to building SRN-RIN two-layer network for a construction project is identifying three relationship sets, includes the stakeholders’ relationship, the risk interaction relationship, and the relationship between stakeholders and risks. An illustrative example is conducted to illustrate the analysis process. This work advances the research on risk interaction in construction projects by incorporating human behavior. The findings will provide support for project managers to improve their risk response decision, which will contribute to the construction project success.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.

REFERENCES

Allen, M., Herring, K., Moody, J., and Williams, C. (2015). “Project Procurement: Impact of Contract Incentives and Penalties.” International Journal of Global Business, 8(2), 1.
Barua, S., Gao, X., Pasman, H., and Mannan, M. S. (2016). “Bayesian network based dynamic operational risk assessment.” J. Loss Prevent. Proc., https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2015.11.024,(ASCE) 41 399–410.
Ben-David, I., and Raz, T. (2001). “An integrated approach for risk response development in project planning.” J. Oper. Res. Soc., https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601029,(ASCE) 52(1), 14–25.
Butt, A., Naaranoja, M., and Savolainen, J. (2016). “Project change stakeholder communication.” International Journal of Project Management, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.08.010,(ASCE) 34(8), 1579–1595.
Chang, H. H., and Chuang, S. (2011). “Social capital and individual motivations on knowledge sharing: Participant involvement as a moderator.” Inform. Manage.-Amster., https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2010.11.001,(ASCE) 48(1), 9–18.
Chang, T., Hwang, B., Deng, X., and Zhao, X. (2018). “Identifying Political Risk Management Strategies in International Construction Projects.” Advances in Civil Engineering, https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1016384,(ASCE) 2018 1–11.
Clarke, N. (2010). “Projects are emotional:how project managers’ emotional awareness can influence decisions and behaviour in projects.” International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, https://doi.org/10.1108/17538371011076073,(ASCE) 3(4), 604–624.
Danilovic, M., and Browning, T. R. (2007). “Managing complex product development projects with design structure matrices and domain mapping matrices.” International Journal of Project Management, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.11.003,(ASCE) 25(3), 300–314.
Deng, X., and Low, S. P. (2014). “Exploring Critical Variables That Affect Political Risk Level in International Construction Projects: Case Study from Chinese Contractors.” J. Prof. Iss. Eng. Ed. Pr., https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000174,(ASCE) 140(1), 4013002.
Derakhshan, R., Turner, R., and Mancini, M. (2019). “Project governance and stakeholders: a literature review.” International Journal of Project Management, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2018.10.007,(ASCE) 37(1), 98–116.
Fang, C., Marle, F., and Xie, M. (2017). “Applying Importance Measures to Risk Analysis in Engineering Project Using a Risk Network Model.” IEEE Syst. J., https://doi.org/10.1109/JSYST.2016.2536701,(ASCE) 11(3), 1548–1556.
Fang, C., and Marle, F. (2012). “A simulation-based risk network model for decision support in project risk management.” Decis. Support Syst., https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2011.10.021,(ASCE) 52(3), 635–644.
Ferdous, R., Khan, F., Sadiq, R., Amyotte, P., and Veitch, B. (2011). “Fault and Event Tree Analyses for Process Systems Risk Analysis: Uncertainty Handling Formulations.” Risk Anal., https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01475.x,(ASCE) 31(1), 86–107.
Freeman, R. E. (1984). “Strategic Management: A Stakholder Approach.” Journal of Management Studies, 29(2), 131–154.
Hillson, D. (1999). “Developing Effective Risk Responses.” Proceedings of the 30th Annual Project Management Institute Seminars & Symposium, 10–16.
Jiang, W., Zhao, X., and Zuo, J. (2017). “(Dis)Trust, Control, and Project Success: From a Chinese Project Owner’s Perspective.” Sustainability-Basel, https://doi.org/10.3390/su9111936,(ASCE) 9(11), 1936.
Maurer, M., and Lindemann, U. (2008). “The application of the Multiple-Domain Matrix: Considering multiple domains and dependency types in complex product design.” https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSMC.2008.4811669,(ASCE) 2487–2493.
Mok, K. Y., Shen, G. Q., and Yang, J. (2015). “Stakeholder management studies in mega construction projects: A review and future directions.” International Journal of Project Management, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.08.007,(ASCE) 33(2), 446–457.
Pfeffer, J., and Salancik, G. R. (1978). The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective, Harper & Row.
PMI (Project Management Institute). (2017). A guide to the project management body of knowledge: (PMBOK Guide), Project Management Institute.
Pollack, J., and Matous, P. (2019). “Testing the impact of targeted team building on project team communication using social network analysis.” International Journal of Project Management, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2019.02.005,(ASCE) 37(3), 473–484.
Pryke, S. D. (2005). “Towards a social network theory of project governance.” Construction Management and Economics, https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190500184196,(ASCE) 23(9), 927–939.
Rose, T., and Manley, K. (2011). “Motivation toward financial incentive goals on construction projects.” Journal of Business Research, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2010.07.003,(ASCE) 64(7), 765–773.
Rowley, T., Behrens, D., and Krackhardt, D. (2000). “Redundant governance structures: An analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries.” Strategic Management Journal, https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3%3C369::AID-SMJ93%3E3.0.CO;2-M,(ASCE) 21(3), 369–386.
Rowley, T. J. (1997). “Moving beyond Dyadic Ties: A Network Theory of Stakeholder Influences.” Academy of Management, 22(4), 887–910.
Royan Hargi Saputra, K. B. W. (2017). “Analysis of Factors Affecting the Risk of Failure in Achieving the Project Targets on the Construction Activity of Samarinda Baru Airport.” European Researcher, https://doi.org/10.13187/er.2017.3.236,(ASCE) 8(3).
Seyedhoseini, S. M., Noori, S., and Hatefi, M. A. (2009). “An Integrated Methodology for Assessment and Selection of the Project Risk Response Actions.” Risk Anal., https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01187.x,(ASCE) 29(5), 752–763.
Taroun, A. (2014). “Towards a better modelling and assessment of construction risk: Insights from a literature review.” International Journal of Project Management, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.03.004,(ASCE) 32(1), 101–115.
Wagner Mainardes, E., Alves, H., and Raposo, M. (2012). “A model for stakeholder classification and stakeholder relationships.” Management Decision, https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741211279648,(ASCE) 50(10), 1861–1879.
Wang, L., Sun, T., Qian, C., Goh, M., and Mishra, V. K. (2019). “Applying social network analysis to genetic algorithm in optimizing project risk response decisions.” Inform. Sciences, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2019.10.012,(ASCE).
Wang, L., Sun, T., Qian, C., Goh, M., and Mishra, V. K. (2020). “Applying social network analysis to genetic algorithm in optimizing project risk response decisions.” Inform. Sciences, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2019.10.012,(ASCE) 512 1024–1042.
Wang, L., and Zhang, X. (2018). “Bayesian Analytics for Estimating Risk Probability in PPP Waste-to-Energy Projects.” J. Manage. Eng., 34(6), 04018047.
Wu, D., Li, J., Xia, T., Bao, C., Zhao, Y., and Dai, Q. (2018). “A multiobjective optimization method considering process risk correlation for project risk response planning.” Inform. Sciences, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2018.07.013,(ASCE) 467 282–295.
Yang, R. J., and Zou, P. X. W. (2014). “Stakeholder-associated risks and their interactions in complex green building projects: A social network model.” Build. Environ., https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.12.014,(ASCE) 73 208–222.
Zhang, R., Andam, F., and Shi, G. (2017). “Environmental and social risk evaluation of overseas investment under the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor.” Environ. Monit. Assess., https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-017-5967-6,(ASCE) 189(6).
Zhang, Y., and Fan, Z. (2014). “An optimization method for selecting project risk response strategies.” International Journal of Project Management, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.06.006,(ASCE) 32(3), 412–422.
Zuo, F., and Zhang, K. (2018). “Selection of risk response actions with consideration of secondary risks.” International Journal of Project Management, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.11.002,(ASCE) 36(2), 241–254.
Zwikael, O., and Smyrk, J. (2015). “Project governance: Balancing control and trust in dealing with risk.” International Journal of Project Management, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.10.012,(ASCE) 33(4), 852–862.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Construction Research Congress 2022
Construction Research Congress 2022
Pages: 794 - 804

History

Published online: Mar 7, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

1School of Management, Shandong Univ., Jinan, China. Email: [email protected]
Ronggui Ding [email protected]
2School of Management, Shandong Univ., Jinan, China. Email: [email protected]
3School of Management, Shandong Univ., Jinan, China. Email: [email protected]
4School of Building Construction, College of Design, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA. Email: [email protected]
5School of Building Construction, College of Design, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$226.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$226.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share